Would you get a job if you left your resume at home and only spoke of how your competitor is a bad deal?
Apr 16 2014. 04 14 PM IST
Doesn’t the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) have
anything to showcase for its 10 years in power? I ask this question
because in all that have I read or watched about the ongoing Lok Sabha
election campaign, I find little mention in any of the UPA leaders’
speeches (which basically boils down to what Sonia and Rahul Gandhi are saying) of the achievements of a government that has run India for a decade.
All the rhetoric seems to be centred around Narendra Modi
and secularism: if the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and its allies come
to power and Modi becomes prime minister, the secular fabric of the
country will be shred to pieces, the spirit of India will be lost for
ever. The message is: Modi is the bogeyman, don’t vote for him. It is a
campaign built on inducing fear.
Let’s put it in mundane terms. When applying for a job,
the candidate sends in his resume listing out—and usually
exaggerating—his past achievements. Later, if called for an interview,
he explains his career so far in more detail, tries to convince his
prospective employers that he brings value to the table, and that he has
a lot of ideas that the company could think worth considering. If the
job at stake is a senior management position, he would also speak of
strategic opportunities for the company and directions that the firm
could move in.
But what if the candidate reveals nothing about what he
has been doing so far and is vague about what his value could be to the
company? What if he only speaks about how the company will go down the
drain if it selects anyone else?
Any sane interviewing board would simply think that the
man had no clue about how to go around getting a job. Also, by making
his competitors the prime focus of his argument, the candidate has
actually turned his interviewers’ attention to them.
Every time the Gandhis pour vitriol on Modi, they make
Modi even more firmly the centrepiece of this election campaign. Every
time Congressmen, in their speeches, deny a Modi wave, they make sure
that there is actually talk of just such a thing. If a hundred days ago,
a fisherman in the Lakshadweep Islands had never heard of Modi, the
Congress has made sure that now he knows. Right from the beginning, Modi
has been trying to turn the 2014 poll into a presidential-style
election, and the Congress has walked right into his trap. Modi wanted a
larger-than-life image, and by shouting bogeyman daily, the Congress
has gifted him that.
All logic indicates that an incumbent government must
extoll its accomplishments, what it has done for the country, and that
the people should vote it back in power because it wishes to complete
the incomplete tasks, and take the nation further forward. But this
government is saying nothing about its own performance, merely warning
voters that Modi will ruin India.
This is not new. In the two years leading up to this
election, ever since Rahul Gandhi started addressing rallies all over
the country, he kept harping on extensive economic and social inequity,
disempowerment of women, lack of opportunities for the youth, the
rottenness of the political system—in fact, every ill that India suffers
from. This begged several questions; but let me mention only two: Are
you in power or in the opposition? Who created and has been running the
political system you are so fed up of for 56 of the 67 years since
independence? These doubts were cleared in last year’s state elections,
in which the Congress was trounced. But the party does not seem to have
learnt any lesson from that.
Thus we are now seeing a Congress campaign that tells me
nothing about what the party did for me in the last 10 years, only what
it thinks Modi will do to me if he comes to power (though it is rather
vague even about that). Add to that the desperate attempts to polarize
votes on caste and religious lines. The trouble is: for the vast
majority of the electorate, secularism (whatever definition you use) is
not the principal issue currently. Opinion poll after opinion poll has
been showing that the people are more concerned about price rise, income
and unemployment. And very few—and these are already committed
anti-Modi voters—would find it a likely possibility that one man could
turn India into a fascist state.
The only time an Indian government went fascist was
during the Emergency, and the times were vastly different then. The
Congress had a big majority, no allies to deal with, regional parties
were weak or non-existent, and India was still a young democracy, in its
late twenties. Intellectuals comparing the rise of Modi with that of
Hitler are also totally mixing up contexts. Hitler arrived at a time
when Germany was economically crippled and internationally humiliated as
a nation. No such situation exists in today’s India.
Modi cannot build a Ram temple at Ayodhya or bring in a
uniform civil code or fiddle with Article 370 even if he craved to do
so. That is why he has rarely mentioned anything about these issues in
any of his speeches. He has simply been presenting his
resume—exaggerated, of course, but that is par for the course for a
candidate; promising economic growth and development; and mocking the
UPA government and the Gandhis.
But the Congress has left its resume at home and can only
try to scare voters about Modi. This is not how an incumbent government
should go to the polls. The BJP must be very pleased.
Source: http://www.livemint.com/Opinion/FFOa11Ff7exXSzZDKsXtOL/Why-the-Congress-campaign-is-doomed.html
No comments:
Post a Comment