Titu Shadowson
Asansol News
January 10, 2013; New Delhi:
The 5th
accused of Delhi rape case is being justified and being defended and
the great humanist intellectuals and protesters who were stopping rapes
by smiling before camera with photogenic festoons and catchy slogans are
now nowhere to ask for Death Sentence to this 5th accused.
Is it coincidental or there is something fishy? Wait for a few minutes
because the hypocrisy of these rape protesters is going to be exposed.
Let
us not know the reason first and analyze how much logical is it to
defend him as a minor? The DCP Chhaya Sharma has said that the 5th
accused Raju is a minor. Surprisingly the great protesters who were
asking for capital punishment, limb-amputation, hanging-to-death in
public; are all absent from scene. None is questioning why should Raju
be spared, only because he is a minor? Didn’t he remind that he was a
minor while he was brutally raping a helpless girl and attacking her
with a rod? Wasn’t he young then? If age doesn’t matter while committing
a crime why does it matter while being punished for that? But these
intellectual reasons are absent from the scene due to some obvious
reasons that I am going to expose by the end.
3 points must be noted in the whole scenario:
- Even as all the 6 rapists were equally unknown and equally guilty of the crime, one name was being highly emphasized by the media and intellectuals. That is “Ram Singh”. Why?
- Except the 5th accused Raju, all the five rapists’ full name and details were made available to media or the media deliberately suppressed the actual name of Raju. Why?
- Except Raju, no other rapist is being checked whether they are minors are not and none is framing innocent and sorrowful stories like Raju. Why?
Yes, here we
have a statement of DCP Chhaya Sharma on Zee News that tells us that
Raju is from a very disturbed family, having six siblings, with a
liquor-addicted father, absconding mother, detached from family for last
5 years. So what do we make of that? Do these circumstances give him a
strong reason to rape a helpless girl? What is the motive of DCP Chhaya
Sharma or the hidden forces if any behind her that make her spit out
these useless backgrounds; rather than revealing the name and location
of Raju, who is a co-criminal like all other 5 rapists?
The reason
is that Raju is a Muslim. Yes, Raju’s religion is his defense and his
subsidy to rape. He was arrested from his hometown Badayun in Uttar
Pradesh. His real name is Mohammed Afroz. Now let me answer the 3
questions I made above.
- The name of “Ram Singh” is politically catchy and is a strong weapon of the anti-Hindu media and Islamic propagandists to bash Hindus. Read Asansol News’ earlier reports how the name of “Ram Singh” was used in propaganda. Ram Singh has done the totally anti-parallel work of Lord Shree Ram, the Hindu God, who was the ultimate target of this propaganda. It is bullshit how the media was on its own motive even in the time of crisis.
- The media and administration wanted to keep the public in dark that the rape was done by all Hindus and thus were running an Islamic propaganda that was exposed in the Asansol News’ previous reports. This is a great tactics of the media to defame Hindus. Generally only the Hindus are bashed for dowry-killings but equal number of such killings happen in Muslim families that are buried in silence. While reporting baby-torture issue the Baloch journalist Aamna Shahwani exposed in Asansol News how the Muslim babies named Afreen (Muslim name) are mentioned as Neha (Hindu sounding name) so that their great Muslim fathers are not bashed and Hindu culture is bashed for a crime they really didn’t commit. The media is so excellent propagandist that it uses photoshop software to color they dress of Islamic terror master Abu Jundal as saffron even as his real dress is available and pronounce him as Jindal (Hindu sounding name) rather than Jundal.
- The last strategy is a useless attempt to save the Muslim criminals from the punishment they deserve. To build a public sympathy towards him. In India, the Muslims are governed not by Indian constitution but by All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB) which doesn’t see crime in various cases which are considered crime in Indian Constitution. For example, having more than one wife is a crime for common Indian but Muslims give a damn, a poking finger to Indian constitution and are free to have four wives. This is the double standard pseudo-secularism in India.
Of course
the common Indian people with their ostrich mentality and intoxicated in
absurd Indian secularism will not understand my words and will have a
tough time to grasp it. Or if they think that media is not making
propaganda and I am connecting different points; then let me clarify. I
am demonstrating the same Zee News report in which they have carefully
hidden the actual name of Raju (Mohammed Afroz) and emphatically barked
that “Akshay Kumar Singh likes to be called by the name Thakur.” Do you
know the meaning of this quotation? This line serves a great propaganda
Islamic forces use to divide the Hindus. “Thakur” symbolizes upper caste
Hindus. The Zee News wanted to move the rape case into a casteist line
while at the same time maintaining their secularist status quo- hiding
the misdeeds of Muslim criminals. These so called secular entities are
those who bark “Dalit women” raped but never say “Brahmin women raped”
in other cases. I don’t encourage them to do what they don’t do, but
strongly discourage them in what they do. Strange secularism Indians are
living in where none can mention the difference between Hindus and
Muslims which are existent and sponsored by the state to serve the
fanatic Muslims; but are hell bent to divide the Hindus in the name of
caste. And see the hypocrisy; they are the one who bark about themselves
being beyond caste and creed. Shameful or shameless?
The rapists
were all equally guilty and must be punished equally. If rapists like
Mohammed Afroz will be spared on the name of religion on the excuse of
being minor, then they would happily rape whomever they want until they
turn 18 and believe me they will never turn 18, politically 18, the 18
that these double standard secularists consider 18. Damini’s will be
raped continuously until these Mohammed’s turn 18 and all the gimmick
protests in India gate and Kolkata-Mumbai streets will go in vain and
they went in vain in an illustrious case in past;
in the case of Dhananjay, the rapist who raped and murdered Hetal
Parekh. The public had the same attitude and he was hanged. But
strangely when Muslim rapists were raping Bengali women massively, the
Bengali women were maligned as being watery and loose-character.
Strange! It is time to prove that all those protests in the Indian gate
and metropolitan streets were not just gimmicks; it is time to punish
all the rapists even if he is a Muslim. Else Damini’s will be
continuously raped by Mohammed’s.
No comments:
Post a Comment