Jaya Jaitly has been one of George Fernandes's closest aides for many
years. She has been with him through thick and thin, but just when he
needs her the most, she was denied access to meet him when his estranged
wife Laila Fernandes took him under her care. The Supreme Court later
allowed Jaya to meet him once in a fortnight for 15 minutes. In this
exclusive and wide ranging interview, she bares her heart out to
Onkareshwar Pandey, the trials and tribulations and her attempts to
'rescue' George from his comatose existence.
ONKARESHWAR PANDEY | Issue Dated: October 21, 2012, New Delhi
Tags : jaya jaitley | nitish kumar | george fernandes | sharad yadav... |
Tags : jaya jaitley | nitish kumar | george fernandes | sharad yadav... |
What has the Delhi High Court said about your plea to meet George when he is so ill?
The High Court ruled that sentiments and politics have no legal relationship. This is strange because not everything is legal. The other point is more important. Emotional relationships are not ignored by law. That is why I have appealed to the Supreme Court and notices have been issued to Mrs George Fernandes and finally the Supreme Court allowed me to meet George Saheb once in a fortnight for 15 minutes.
SC decision which came in your favour was based on the UN Convention. What does it say?
The High Court ruled that sentiments and politics have no legal relationship. This is strange because not everything is legal. The other point is more important. Emotional relationships are not ignored by law. That is why I have appealed to the Supreme Court and notices have been issued to Mrs George Fernandes and finally the Supreme Court allowed me to meet George Saheb once in a fortnight for 15 minutes.
SC decision which came in your favour was based on the UN Convention. What does it say?
India is a signatory to the UN Convention on Human Rights. According to
this law, if a person is unable to put forward his point of view for
whatever reason, then a professional person can come to his help so that
his exact views can be ascertained. Even if this does not work, what he
had said earlier becomes applicable. George saheb has written many
letters to me saying that he always improves under my care, that I
provide courage and strength to him. When he was hit by Alzheimer's, he
was looking towards me as a child would towards his mother to alleviate
his difficulties.
How old are these letters?
They are very old letters. I was sitting with him just an hour before
his family returned. A party worker from Muzaffarpur was also there.
When I started to leave, George saheb stopped me but I said tomorrow is
Sunday and I will spend the whole day with you.
How many times did George's wife come to see him?
Hardly ever for the last 15 years. He visited her on her birthday.
George saheb's son Sushanto (he now calls himself by Amer, the penname
of Sean Sawn) was married about 10 years ago to a Japanese girl in
Tokyo. Then both he and his wife had gone to the wedding even though
they travelled separately. She never came to meet George saheb, it was
usually the other way round. When he fell ill, she came with a
photograph of his grandson.
In other words, George and his wife were separated?
Absolutely, even though it was not legal.
How did George react to the meetings?
George saheb is a gentleman. But there are occasions when he got angry.
Seeing Leila's attitude, he felt that the only thing she is interested
in is his wealth. George saheb says she is only interested in money. For
example, he told me that Leila keeps on asking him what he was leaving
for his grandson.
Why did George and Leila separate?
George saheb was very busy, he never had a private life. Except
politics, struggle and agitation. He would barely spend two hours at
home. This lifestyle did not suit Leila and she left him. She used to
live abroad for most of the time and in Panchsheel Enclave when she was
in Delhi. But even while in Delhi, she never once came to meet him. When
she needed anything, she used
to call up.
Today, Leila does not let anyone meet George. Is this a fight for property or legacy?
George saheb has no money. He and his brothers had a 22-acre land given
by his mother which he wanted to sell and donate proceeds to hospitals
and social service organisations. This land is now valued at something
like Rs 11 crore. The signing authority for his routine transactions,
not land matters, lay with me and an associate of his from Mumbai, but
Leila wanted to lay her hands on this money because she thought we were
stealing it.
Apart from this property, does George have anything else?
No, nothing. He would probably have an amount of Rs 6 lakh in the bank
as money saved from his parliamentary work. No house or car.
So the fight is over property?
Yes. George saheb has been operated many times but she never once came to see her. There is a lot of confusion
in Alzheimer's and the patient needs sympathy but Leila has come along with people who George saheb disliked immensely.
What do you want? Are you claiming any rights on him?
To sympathise with a person who is seriously ill, you don't need to
claim any rights on him. It should not be seen merely as an issue which
involves rights.
What is your view on his property?
Leila has full rights over his property; she did so yesterday and she
does today. I do not want anything. I came to George saheb because of
his political work and integrity. I have no interest in his property.
When did you first meet George?
When he was the Union Industry Minister in the Janata Party government,
his relations with my husband Ashok Jaitly were good. I used to work on
handicrafts in the Gujarat emporium. I never visited him because I was
not interested in politics and George saheb was my husband's boss. There
was Emergency in the country and we were posted in Kashmir, which was
also the only state in India which opposed the Emergency. Hence, we were
relatively free there. When the Emergency was over,people generally
believed that Indira Gandhi had been wrong in imposing it. I met him
only a couple of times when he was minister and not before that. After
the Janata Party lost power, me and my husband moved back to Kashmir and
George saheb's wife had gone to the US. Then I used to go look after
his child. It is my habit to help friends and their children. I never
looked at him like a political icon. He was so busy that he never had
time for his child or house so I chipped in. George saheb saw that while
friendships in politics are often need based and opportunistic, here I
was, working and helping selflessly. He was impressed and began to
depend a lot on me. All this is around 1979 or so. In 1984, during the
Delhi anti-Sikh riots, I set up a camp for 3,000 victims. After that,
George saheb, Chandrashekhar and Farooq Abdullah set up a committee to
assist the Sikhs and I was made in charge. I worked under adverse
circumstances but the desire to do social work was very high. Then I
felt that the best way to do social work would be to join politics.
So this was the first step towards politics and social work?
I joined the Janata Dal (JD) as an ordinary worker. Then SR Bommai was
the president of JD. I organised a big meeting of handicraft workers in
which Bommai and other senior leaders were invited. After the success of
the meeting, I was appointed national general secretary of the JD.
And you have been politically active since. How did your name figure in the Tehelka case and what stage has it reached?
The case is in trial. We have questioned some witnesses. There are more
than 10 to 15 witnesses who will be presented. We do not know how many
people would be summoned by the CBI.
You have maintained that the Tehelka scam was pre-meditated.
Of course. If you see the footage, you will realise that far from
indulging in corrupt practices, I was very open and people who are open,
are not afraid. If you see the tape, some people just walk in and say
'they have brought something', to which I say 'send it to Mysore',
because there was a party convention taking place there. To collect
funds, we go house to house. The so-called Tehelka investigation was
sponsored by the Congress and some defence sector middlemen. Tehelka was
just a front. It was an attempt to pull down the NDA government by the
Congress and the Hindujas. When they could not reachGeorge saheb, they
targeted me.
After the Kargil War, there were several charges levelled
against George: amongthem, the case of coffin purchases andCongress's
vitriolic and belligerent tone.
The Congress raised a shindig over coffins but the CBI probe found
nothing. There is no allegation on George saheb and there is no question
of a case. But I have been implicated in the other matter. It is an
attempt to insinuate that George saheb made money through me. The
government does not have the moral courage to apologise for their
mistakes when the CBI did not come up with anything against him.
You do not have the support of any political party in these days of struggle?
I am not associated with any political party. I believe in team work
and that is why I had joined politics to bring about change for which
people could launch joint struggles. I had helped a lot of people when I
was president of the Samata Party. But since Tehelka broke out, no one
has once come and asked me how I am managing things in the situation I
am in. And ofcourse, there is no question of any help coming in from
anywhere.
You got no help from JD (U) leaders?
JD (U) leaders now no longer remember George saheb. His pictures do not
appear in their party posters. Like you will find Vajpayee's
photographs even today.
Who are these people?
There are many. Like Sharad Yadav, for whom George saheb and Madhu
Limaye had once organised funds to fight elections. Also Nitish Kumar.
He has helped many people who ditched him when the time came. Advani is
the only one who keeps in touch.
Had George helped Nitish Kumar?
George saheb worked very hard to turn the political situation to his
advantage. He travelled through Bihar and organised rallies. It was only
then that Nitish Kumar became the Chief Minister.
Does he remember Nitish?
Not at all. George had great understanding of character but Nitish
Kumar was the only person about whom he used to say 'I can never
understand what is going on in this man's mind'. You can figure out how
far George saheb had drifted from Nitish. The party is meant to decide
everything but Nitish Kumar would never attend any meeting and would
later issue statements against it. And he used to pressurise George
saheb.
A little personal aside. For a fiery leader like George, what did he do in his spare time?
He never had any spare time. He was always surrounded by people. When
he did get time, he would read and listen to Konkani and Western
classical music.
When the NDA government went in for nuclear tests, what did George as defence minister think?
As far as I know, this was a collective decision of the NDA government,
the final nod coming from Prime Minister Atal Behari Vajpayee, LK
Advani, George saheb and Jaswant Singh. And George saheb despite being a
votary of destroying nuclear stockpiles, was a party to the decision
because it was in national interest.
George supported peoples' struggles, from Nepal to Myanmar.
He always backed such popular uprisings. Students who were leading the
struggle in Myanmar were often present at his official residence at
Krishna Menon Marg.
He categorised China as the enemy number one.
Not enemy number 1 but as the biggest threat.
Now that George is on his last legs, what are your plans?
I will continue to take forward his views; I have always worked to
improve the conditions of handicraft workers. I will work to create more
models along the lines of the Delhi haat. I am pressing the government
to set up a Hast Kala academy. The magazine earlier edited by George
saheb, The Other Side, is now in my hands since 2006 and I continue to
publish it regularly as he would have wished.
Source: http://www.thesundayindian.com/en/story/nitish-sharad-have-ditched-george-saheb/7/41730/#.Ub7JKwGhGsI.twitter
No comments:
Post a Comment