B. NEW DELHI 2095
C. NEW DELHI 1712
D. 04 NEW DELHI 6042
Classified By: Charge Robert O. Blake, Jr. for Reasons 1.4 (B, D)
1. (C) Summary: Facing multiple crises, including electoral lethargy, growing ideological divides and an uncertain leadership succession, the BJP is drifting further to the right in an attempt to rouse its Hindutva base. The imminent departure of former PM Vajpayee and Party President Advani has energized the party's Hindu fundamentalist wing, which has called for these leaders' immediate resignation, and is trying to compel the party to return to a Hindu nationalist plank which includes anti-Americanism. Advani publicly announced a return to Hindutva ideology to assuage the Sangh Parivar (Hindu organizations), but this may not be enough (Only 25 percent of those polled by "India Today" in January thought it would help). Anecdotal evidence suggests that Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi could be the most popular leader in the BJP and there is increasing momentum to make him the party figurehead and next choice for Prime Minister. Such a move would unite India's secular parties, marginalize the BJP, and presage electoral disaster. Modi bears permanent resentment against the USG for his recent "humiliation," and there is widespread opposition in the party to the US offer of F-16's for Pakistan, which will likely come to center stage when Parliament returns to business on April 20. Modi's ascension would harden the BJP stance toward the US and make cooperation more difficult. Vajpayee has not made his intentions known, but may have trouble keeping the Hindutva forces in check. End Summary.
The Modi Imbroglio
------------------
2. (U) The BJP reacted harshly to the revocation of Chief Minister Narendra Modi's visa by the USG, and he continues to paint himself as a persecuted martyr, stating on April 18 that the "main reason" for his visa denial was because he "does not allow religious conversions in his state." Party President LK Advani earlier came to Modi's aid, calling the visa denial "highly objectionable" and characterizing as "wrong" the Ambassador's statement that the decision applied only to Modi and not the BJP or the Gujarati community.
3. (U) The visa revocation set off a series of anti-American diatribes by BJP columnists, led by the pro-BJP "Pioneer," which attempted to argue that the US launched an anti-India policy by revoking Modi's visa, denying entry to Shia cleric Kalbe Sadiq, and threatening to veto World Bank/IMF loans to India if it does not take concerted steps against human trafficking. "Pioneer" columnist Kanchan Gupta accused "analysts based at the American Embassy in New Delhi" of engineering the revocation to "score brownie points with the UPA regime."
4. (U) Going a step further, other BJP columnists accused the US of hypocrisy," dredging up alleged American sins from Hiroshima, Vietnam, the Cold War, Abu Gharib and Guantanamo, and dismissing a US human rights policy that makes "mountains out of molehills that aren't its business." The "Pioneer" noted that "India is too civilized to have a 'preemptive' Bible telling that other people's human rights weigh less than its own."
5. (C) As the leading opposition party the BJP has also recently taken several policy stances that oppose US positions. While in power, the BJP strongly advocated a Patent Bill and the introduction of a Value Added Tax (VAT) as part of its economic reform policy. The BJP also introduced "bus diplomacy" to normalize relations with Pakistan. In opposition, the party has (at least temporarily) come out against the VAT and the Patent Bill, as well as the recently inaugurated bus service between Srinagar and Muzaffarabad.
Back to Ayodhya
---------------
6. (U) Addressing the BJP's 25th anniversary celebration in New Delhi on April 5, Advani blamed the party's 2004 electoral defeat on party moderates with their "focus on issues of governance," and failure to "nurse the core constituency of ideological supporters." He signaled that the party would swing to the right and not compromise on Hindutva. Reiterating BJP commitment to the construction of the Ram Temple in Ayodhya as "total, unshakable and irreversible," Advani said the party would grow closer to its "ideological constituency," the Hindu Nationalist RSS. Advani also renewed attacks on Sonia Gandhi's "foreign origin," and defended Modi's handling of the post-Godhra riots.
Deep Splits
-----------
7. (U) The BJP has also been plagued with public spats. In the first week of April, a group of high-ranking BJP leaders from Gujarat met with Advani and failed to convince him to dismiss Modi as the state's Chief Minister. After the meeting, they pledged to continue their efforts, saying that Modi's authoritarianism has weakened the party in Gujarat. They also claimed to have the tacit backing of the RSS and VHP.
8. (U) Much more significantly, in an April 10 television broadcast RSS Chief KS Sudarshan called on both Advani and former PM Vajpayee to resign, saying that they are too old to lead the BJP and should step down to make way for "new faces" and "younger leadership." Sudarshan's interview, which continues to reverberate, criticized Vajpayee's tenure as PM, saying that he failed to press for the Hindutva agenda, allowed his relatives to intervene in party affairs, and that his former National Security Advisor Brajesh Mishra harbored pro-Congress sentiments. Mishra replied by charging that Sudarshan had the "vision of a frog in a well." Vajpayee, somewhat poignantly responded that he feared calumny more than death in a public appearance where Vajpayee supporter Shekhar Gupta reported that the former PM was "almost close to tears."
9. (U) On April 12, VHP leaders Giriraj Kishore and Vishnu Hari Dalmiya supported Sudarshan's stance, urged Advani and Vajpayee to retire, and accused them of not sufficiently backing the Hindutva agenda while in power. "Today India needs a dynamic leader, not a person who makes compromises," said Kishore.
Succession Struggle
-------------------
10. (U) While BJP infighting is ideological, it is also a succession struggle between contending personalities. Political insiders expect Vajpayee and Advani to leave active politics within the next two years. Vajpayee's own statements make his departure appear more imminent. On April 6, he told the assembled BJP leadership that "I am really troubled. I can work up to a limit and no more."
11. (U) The RSS and VHP have clear preferences regarding who should replace Vajpayee and Advani. Modi is the favorite of both groups to replace Vajpayee and become the party's candidate for Prime Minister, while the VHP supports former Madhya Pradesh Chief Minister Uma Bharati, or Rajasthan Chief Minister Vasundhara Raje Scindia to replace Advani. The RSS purportedly favors BJP National Executive Member Sushma Swaraj for Party President, but the VHP is not enthusiastic. In the same interview where he attacked Vajpayee, Sudarshan said Bharati is "obstinate" and "behaves like a child."
12. (U) The BJP's moderate wing de-emphasizes Hindutva in favor of pragmatism, international diplomacy, and creating a good climate for investment and business. Leaders considered firmly within the non-Hindutva camp include: Jaswant Singh, Arun Jaitley, Pramod Mahajan, Arun Shourie, Ravi Shankar Prasad, Yashwant Sinha, and Mukhtar Abbas Naqvi. The Sangh Parivar has ruled them all out. The moderates have not publicly endorsed candidates for the top slots, and perhaps are waiting for Vajapayee to state his preference before taking on the Sangh Parivar and igniting a civil war within the party. Few of these moderates have credibility as retail politicians, leaving them dependent on the RSS's mobilization ability.
Modi's Supporters
-----------------
13. (C) Poloff recently met with BJP leaders who agreed that there is lingering resentment within the party regarding Modi's visa denial. Nalin Kohli, a pro-American moderate who is the convenor of the Party's Media Cell, claimed that it caused widespread "shock and surprise" within the BJP, which viewed it as an affront to the party and India. Even if the USG does not like Modi, he argued, how could it insult a "democratically-elected Chief Minister?" Kohli felt that the USG had been manipulated by "small time operators" and NGOs which have no international standing.
14. (C) Like other BJP interlocutors, MP Yijayendra Pal Singh praised Modi for providing "good governance" to Gujarat and "turning around" the state economy. Singh dismissed the Gujarat "dissidents," characterizing them as "frustrated" because Modi cleaned up the state and stopped their corrupt practices. MP and journalist Balbir Punj was particularly acerbic. Describing the Modi decision as "unfair," he insisted that US hypocrisy would be exposed if the USG did not now deny visas to all Saudi and Chinese government officials. Punj insisted that the BJP would select Modi as its candidate for Prime Minister, saying "I want to see him elected just to spite the US."
15. (C) RSS leader and BJP national executive member Seshadri Chari claimed that there was "universal anger" in the party regarding USG treatment of Modi, and that all agreed that "there was no reason" for it. Unlike other BJP leaders, however, Chari felt the party and the US should "put this behind us," and thought that meetings with Advani and other senior party leaders to discuss differences would help clear the air. Calling Modi's treatment "an insult to all the people of India," BJP MP Ashok Pradhan claimed that the party would not "put the issue behind us."
Skeptical on the South Asia Initiative
--------------------------------------
16. (C) The BJP leaders also dismissed the Secretary's offer "to help make India a world power" as "patronizing," insisting that India would become a world power with or without US help. The BJP would not really believe that the US is sincere until it supports a permanent seat for India in the UNSC with veto power, he noted.
17. (C) As expected, all BJP interlocutors condemned the US offer of F-16's to Pakistan. Kohli noted that the BJP viewed the offer with "suspicion," as it would "set off an arms race, benefit the US economy," and "links India with Pakistan." Punj dismissed it saying "the F-16's are of no consequence," but insisted that Pakistan is a "danger to the entire world" and urged a total arms boycott. Chari described the offer as a "setback for India/Pakistan relations," arguing that it would embolden Pakistan to challenge India and be less cooperative on Kashmir and other pressing issues. Pradhan accused the US of "hypocrisy" for claiming to want good Indo-Pak relations while fanning an arms race and providing Islamabad with sophisticated weapons to use against New Delhi. He claimed that the US could not claim to lead a war on terrorism while cultivating Pakistan, which sponsors anti-Indian terrorist attacks.
Agreement on Economy and Kashmir
--------------------------------
18. (C) Kohli was more supportive on other issues. He maintained that the BJP and USG stances on VAT, the Patent Bill, and Kashmir bus diplomacy, were not far apart, and that the BJP's behavior reflected short term calculations of domestic political advantage, rather than substance. Accusing the GOI of "irresponsibility," he blamed the BJP's opposition on UPA failure to negotiate in good faith during a series of high-level meetings held before the current parliamentary session. He hinted that economic policies and Indo-Pak initiatives would remain hostage to Congress/BJP infighting, in that his party would not change its stance until the UPA shows more flexibility.
Party Infighting
----------------
19. (C) BJP leaders refused to comment on the party's succession struggle. Kohli regretted that "internal matters" are being played out in public, but would not speculate regarding who is next in line to replace Advani and Vajpayee, saying only that "you should not believe what you read in the papers." Punj confirmed that the Sangh Parivar was bitter because it felt that Vajpayee had ignored Hindutva while in power. He dismissed RSS/VHP calls for Vajpayee and Advani to step down, however, saying the problem was not "serious" and would soon "blow over."
20. (C) Chari agreed that the hostility between the Sangh Parivar and the BJP leadership was "nothing new," insisting that the party would resolve the problems before they became "serious." He noted that unlike Congress, the BJP is not a "dynastic party" and its future was not tied to the fate of Vajpayee and Advani. He predicted that the party would select new leaders at the proper time in a disciplined manner
Comment
-------
21. (C) Sangh Parivar discontent and bitterness percolates just below the surface and periodically breaks into the open, causing speculation that the party will consume itself in internecine struggle. Until now, Vajpayee has preserved a facade of party unity by keeping the Sangh Parivar and its Hindu nationalist aspirations in check. Under his leadership, the party has papered over differences and moved on. With Vajpayee leaving the scene, the Sangh Parivar is more determined than ever to restore what it perceives as its rightful place in the BJP, even if that means a lengthy spell in the political wilderness. This time the outcome may be different, and the party could face serious and divisive problems, as there is a congruence of ideological differences, a succession struggle, and growing antipathy towards the US. It is a sign of how far the party has sunk that the hard-liner Sudarshan (Reftel D) has been setting the BJP's agenda, with even statesmen like Advani and Vajpayee obliged to follow his tune.
22. (C) Despite or perhaps because of his reputation as an international pariah, Modi has emerged for now as the figurehead for the Sangh Parivar. The Sangh seems determined to make Modi the BJP leader and candidate for PM. While increasingly popular within segments of the party, he remains unpopular in India and divisive in his home state. His selection would unite India's "secular" opposition against the BJP, leading to increasing isolation, electoral defeat, and marginalization. A party with Modi in charge would also be more anti-American and less cooperative with the US. BJP leaders tell us that Modi "will never forgive the US" for his treatment, which is a stark contrast with the present generation's pathbreaking support for US-India partnership.
BLAKE
Source: https://www.wikileaks.org/plusd/cables/05NEWDELHI2932_a.html
C. NEW DELHI 1712
D. 04 NEW DELHI 6042
Classified By: Charge Robert O. Blake, Jr. for Reasons 1.4 (B, D)
1. (C) Summary: Facing multiple crises, including electoral lethargy, growing ideological divides and an uncertain leadership succession, the BJP is drifting further to the right in an attempt to rouse its Hindutva base. The imminent departure of former PM Vajpayee and Party President Advani has energized the party's Hindu fundamentalist wing, which has called for these leaders' immediate resignation, and is trying to compel the party to return to a Hindu nationalist plank which includes anti-Americanism. Advani publicly announced a return to Hindutva ideology to assuage the Sangh Parivar (Hindu organizations), but this may not be enough (Only 25 percent of those polled by "India Today" in January thought it would help). Anecdotal evidence suggests that Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi could be the most popular leader in the BJP and there is increasing momentum to make him the party figurehead and next choice for Prime Minister. Such a move would unite India's secular parties, marginalize the BJP, and presage electoral disaster. Modi bears permanent resentment against the USG for his recent "humiliation," and there is widespread opposition in the party to the US offer of F-16's for Pakistan, which will likely come to center stage when Parliament returns to business on April 20. Modi's ascension would harden the BJP stance toward the US and make cooperation more difficult. Vajpayee has not made his intentions known, but may have trouble keeping the Hindutva forces in check. End Summary.
The Modi Imbroglio
------------------
2. (U) The BJP reacted harshly to the revocation of Chief Minister Narendra Modi's visa by the USG, and he continues to paint himself as a persecuted martyr, stating on April 18 that the "main reason" for his visa denial was because he "does not allow religious conversions in his state." Party President LK Advani earlier came to Modi's aid, calling the visa denial "highly objectionable" and characterizing as "wrong" the Ambassador's statement that the decision applied only to Modi and not the BJP or the Gujarati community.
3. (U) The visa revocation set off a series of anti-American diatribes by BJP columnists, led by the pro-BJP "Pioneer," which attempted to argue that the US launched an anti-India policy by revoking Modi's visa, denying entry to Shia cleric Kalbe Sadiq, and threatening to veto World Bank/IMF loans to India if it does not take concerted steps against human trafficking. "Pioneer" columnist Kanchan Gupta accused "analysts based at the American Embassy in New Delhi" of engineering the revocation to "score brownie points with the UPA regime."
4. (U) Going a step further, other BJP columnists accused the US of hypocrisy," dredging up alleged American sins from Hiroshima, Vietnam, the Cold War, Abu Gharib and Guantanamo, and dismissing a US human rights policy that makes "mountains out of molehills that aren't its business." The "Pioneer" noted that "India is too civilized to have a 'preemptive' Bible telling that other people's human rights weigh less than its own."
5. (C) As the leading opposition party the BJP has also recently taken several policy stances that oppose US positions. While in power, the BJP strongly advocated a Patent Bill and the introduction of a Value Added Tax (VAT) as part of its economic reform policy. The BJP also introduced "bus diplomacy" to normalize relations with Pakistan. In opposition, the party has (at least temporarily) come out against the VAT and the Patent Bill, as well as the recently inaugurated bus service between Srinagar and Muzaffarabad.
Back to Ayodhya
---------------
6. (U) Addressing the BJP's 25th anniversary celebration in New Delhi on April 5, Advani blamed the party's 2004 electoral defeat on party moderates with their "focus on issues of governance," and failure to "nurse the core constituency of ideological supporters." He signaled that the party would swing to the right and not compromise on Hindutva. Reiterating BJP commitment to the construction of the Ram Temple in Ayodhya as "total, unshakable and irreversible," Advani said the party would grow closer to its "ideological constituency," the Hindu Nationalist RSS. Advani also renewed attacks on Sonia Gandhi's "foreign origin," and defended Modi's handling of the post-Godhra riots.
Deep Splits
-----------
7. (U) The BJP has also been plagued with public spats. In the first week of April, a group of high-ranking BJP leaders from Gujarat met with Advani and failed to convince him to dismiss Modi as the state's Chief Minister. After the meeting, they pledged to continue their efforts, saying that Modi's authoritarianism has weakened the party in Gujarat. They also claimed to have the tacit backing of the RSS and VHP.
8. (U) Much more significantly, in an April 10 television broadcast RSS Chief KS Sudarshan called on both Advani and former PM Vajpayee to resign, saying that they are too old to lead the BJP and should step down to make way for "new faces" and "younger leadership." Sudarshan's interview, which continues to reverberate, criticized Vajpayee's tenure as PM, saying that he failed to press for the Hindutva agenda, allowed his relatives to intervene in party affairs, and that his former National Security Advisor Brajesh Mishra harbored pro-Congress sentiments. Mishra replied by charging that Sudarshan had the "vision of a frog in a well." Vajpayee, somewhat poignantly responded that he feared calumny more than death in a public appearance where Vajpayee supporter Shekhar Gupta reported that the former PM was "almost close to tears."
9. (U) On April 12, VHP leaders Giriraj Kishore and Vishnu Hari Dalmiya supported Sudarshan's stance, urged Advani and Vajpayee to retire, and accused them of not sufficiently backing the Hindutva agenda while in power. "Today India needs a dynamic leader, not a person who makes compromises," said Kishore.
Succession Struggle
-------------------
10. (U) While BJP infighting is ideological, it is also a succession struggle between contending personalities. Political insiders expect Vajpayee and Advani to leave active politics within the next two years. Vajpayee's own statements make his departure appear more imminent. On April 6, he told the assembled BJP leadership that "I am really troubled. I can work up to a limit and no more."
11. (U) The RSS and VHP have clear preferences regarding who should replace Vajpayee and Advani. Modi is the favorite of both groups to replace Vajpayee and become the party's candidate for Prime Minister, while the VHP supports former Madhya Pradesh Chief Minister Uma Bharati, or Rajasthan Chief Minister Vasundhara Raje Scindia to replace Advani. The RSS purportedly favors BJP National Executive Member Sushma Swaraj for Party President, but the VHP is not enthusiastic. In the same interview where he attacked Vajpayee, Sudarshan said Bharati is "obstinate" and "behaves like a child."
12. (U) The BJP's moderate wing de-emphasizes Hindutva in favor of pragmatism, international diplomacy, and creating a good climate for investment and business. Leaders considered firmly within the non-Hindutva camp include: Jaswant Singh, Arun Jaitley, Pramod Mahajan, Arun Shourie, Ravi Shankar Prasad, Yashwant Sinha, and Mukhtar Abbas Naqvi. The Sangh Parivar has ruled them all out. The moderates have not publicly endorsed candidates for the top slots, and perhaps are waiting for Vajapayee to state his preference before taking on the Sangh Parivar and igniting a civil war within the party. Few of these moderates have credibility as retail politicians, leaving them dependent on the RSS's mobilization ability.
Modi's Supporters
-----------------
13. (C) Poloff recently met with BJP leaders who agreed that there is lingering resentment within the party regarding Modi's visa denial. Nalin Kohli, a pro-American moderate who is the convenor of the Party's Media Cell, claimed that it caused widespread "shock and surprise" within the BJP, which viewed it as an affront to the party and India. Even if the USG does not like Modi, he argued, how could it insult a "democratically-elected Chief Minister?" Kohli felt that the USG had been manipulated by "small time operators" and NGOs which have no international standing.
14. (C) Like other BJP interlocutors, MP Yijayendra Pal Singh praised Modi for providing "good governance" to Gujarat and "turning around" the state economy. Singh dismissed the Gujarat "dissidents," characterizing them as "frustrated" because Modi cleaned up the state and stopped their corrupt practices. MP and journalist Balbir Punj was particularly acerbic. Describing the Modi decision as "unfair," he insisted that US hypocrisy would be exposed if the USG did not now deny visas to all Saudi and Chinese government officials. Punj insisted that the BJP would select Modi as its candidate for Prime Minister, saying "I want to see him elected just to spite the US."
15. (C) RSS leader and BJP national executive member Seshadri Chari claimed that there was "universal anger" in the party regarding USG treatment of Modi, and that all agreed that "there was no reason" for it. Unlike other BJP leaders, however, Chari felt the party and the US should "put this behind us," and thought that meetings with Advani and other senior party leaders to discuss differences would help clear the air. Calling Modi's treatment "an insult to all the people of India," BJP MP Ashok Pradhan claimed that the party would not "put the issue behind us."
Skeptical on the South Asia Initiative
--------------------------------------
16. (C) The BJP leaders also dismissed the Secretary's offer "to help make India a world power" as "patronizing," insisting that India would become a world power with or without US help. The BJP would not really believe that the US is sincere until it supports a permanent seat for India in the UNSC with veto power, he noted.
17. (C) As expected, all BJP interlocutors condemned the US offer of F-16's to Pakistan. Kohli noted that the BJP viewed the offer with "suspicion," as it would "set off an arms race, benefit the US economy," and "links India with Pakistan." Punj dismissed it saying "the F-16's are of no consequence," but insisted that Pakistan is a "danger to the entire world" and urged a total arms boycott. Chari described the offer as a "setback for India/Pakistan relations," arguing that it would embolden Pakistan to challenge India and be less cooperative on Kashmir and other pressing issues. Pradhan accused the US of "hypocrisy" for claiming to want good Indo-Pak relations while fanning an arms race and providing Islamabad with sophisticated weapons to use against New Delhi. He claimed that the US could not claim to lead a war on terrorism while cultivating Pakistan, which sponsors anti-Indian terrorist attacks.
Agreement on Economy and Kashmir
--------------------------------
18. (C) Kohli was more supportive on other issues. He maintained that the BJP and USG stances on VAT, the Patent Bill, and Kashmir bus diplomacy, were not far apart, and that the BJP's behavior reflected short term calculations of domestic political advantage, rather than substance. Accusing the GOI of "irresponsibility," he blamed the BJP's opposition on UPA failure to negotiate in good faith during a series of high-level meetings held before the current parliamentary session. He hinted that economic policies and Indo-Pak initiatives would remain hostage to Congress/BJP infighting, in that his party would not change its stance until the UPA shows more flexibility.
Party Infighting
----------------
19. (C) BJP leaders refused to comment on the party's succession struggle. Kohli regretted that "internal matters" are being played out in public, but would not speculate regarding who is next in line to replace Advani and Vajpayee, saying only that "you should not believe what you read in the papers." Punj confirmed that the Sangh Parivar was bitter because it felt that Vajpayee had ignored Hindutva while in power. He dismissed RSS/VHP calls for Vajpayee and Advani to step down, however, saying the problem was not "serious" and would soon "blow over."
20. (C) Chari agreed that the hostility between the Sangh Parivar and the BJP leadership was "nothing new," insisting that the party would resolve the problems before they became "serious." He noted that unlike Congress, the BJP is not a "dynastic party" and its future was not tied to the fate of Vajpayee and Advani. He predicted that the party would select new leaders at the proper time in a disciplined manner
Comment
-------
21. (C) Sangh Parivar discontent and bitterness percolates just below the surface and periodically breaks into the open, causing speculation that the party will consume itself in internecine struggle. Until now, Vajpayee has preserved a facade of party unity by keeping the Sangh Parivar and its Hindu nationalist aspirations in check. Under his leadership, the party has papered over differences and moved on. With Vajpayee leaving the scene, the Sangh Parivar is more determined than ever to restore what it perceives as its rightful place in the BJP, even if that means a lengthy spell in the political wilderness. This time the outcome may be different, and the party could face serious and divisive problems, as there is a congruence of ideological differences, a succession struggle, and growing antipathy towards the US. It is a sign of how far the party has sunk that the hard-liner Sudarshan (Reftel D) has been setting the BJP's agenda, with even statesmen like Advani and Vajpayee obliged to follow his tune.
22. (C) Despite or perhaps because of his reputation as an international pariah, Modi has emerged for now as the figurehead for the Sangh Parivar. The Sangh seems determined to make Modi the BJP leader and candidate for PM. While increasingly popular within segments of the party, he remains unpopular in India and divisive in his home state. His selection would unite India's "secular" opposition against the BJP, leading to increasing isolation, electoral defeat, and marginalization. A party with Modi in charge would also be more anti-American and less cooperative with the US. BJP leaders tell us that Modi "will never forgive the US" for his treatment, which is a stark contrast with the present generation's pathbreaking support for US-India partnership.
BLAKE
Source: https://www.wikileaks.org/plusd/cables/05NEWDELHI2932_a.html
No comments:
Post a Comment