A US decision has evidently reaffirmed that Narendra Modi cannot be allowed to become prime minister of India.
Narendra Modi’s case is not fundamentally different because it is
feared that Modi and his supporters will curtail the huge incursions
into India by US agencies the UPA has facilitated. It is assumed that
once Modi forms the government and becomes aware that India’s is well on
the way to becoming a US banana republic satellite–in the age-old
Central American and Asian tradition, subject to indirect rule–he will
move to end it. The US has evidently infiltrated India on a massive
scale, blackmailing politicians with covertly acquired information,
sponsoring countless secular and religious foundations and the purchase
of a huge swathe of the Indian media.
However, the erstwhile
BJP as such was not really a drawback for the US because some of its
prominent leaders had been surrounded by political advisories, who are
very close to the US, virtual spokesmen for it. Others bent over
backwards during the tenure of the NDA to please. Two of the BJP’s most
senior decision makers (non-political), including the late Brajesh
Mishra, even made offers of sending Indian troops to join the coalition
in Afghanistan. The Americans themselves had not made such a request to
India because it would have sent their vital ally in the Afghan war into
veritable frenzy. This idea was very wisely vetoed personally by Atal
Behari Vajpayee himself!
The Western intervention, which has
destroyed much of Syria, killing more than 150,000 people, to the
approving clamour of the Western human rights lobby, is another variant
for re-imposing imperial control over a country. The invasion and
destruction of Iraq was another, the death toll approximately 2 million
so far.
The decision to accord India nuclear status occurred
because of a US perception that it had finally managed to acquire a
durable foothold in it and access to high level Indian decision-making
during the tenure of the UPA. Indeed, it seems, the US was even able to
determine appointments to the Union Cabinet, certainly in the case of
the Commerce and the Environment portfolios and perhaps even the EAM’s
selection is cleared now by the US ambassador in Delhi. The granting of
nuclear status to India, which was well and truly an enormous gift was
motivated by the US view of India as a new client satellite. The journey
in this fateful direction began during the tenure of the NDA and has
neared completion under a totally subverted Congress led UPA. To their
credit, and India Gandhi had resisted this dire predicament during the
first decades of Indian independence.
The UPA of course
represents mainly the family, rather than India and is also deferential
to the US, which is the fate of the family itself as well. Quite
noticeably, the US has helpfully striven to conceal any embarrassing
information on the likely UPA prime ministerial candidate. The purchase
of untested Wastinghouse nuclear reactors as quid pro quo for the
Indo-US Accord was a less significant secondary understanding. One also
begins to understand why the UPA became an agent WalMarts rather than
representing the vital interests of millions of Indian retailers.
This does not mean India accedes to all US dictates, for example over
the purchase of Iranian crude. However, a deeper subservience to US
preferences has been established and is being 'institutionalised'. The
US has become the major shareholder in the equity of the GoI, much as it
has been in Pakistan for decades.
The virtually instant
announcement, after the swearing-in of Arvind Kejriwal and his juvenile
crew, following their inept, comic preening for the media, was a
hunger-strike in Bhopal and the decision to contest elections in
Gujarat. The goal of AAP is now blindingly obvious. The intention is to
split the anti-Congress vote to prevent Modi and the BJP winning enough
seats in 2014 to form a viable government. The other alternative outcome
would be to reduce their number sufficiently to facilitate the
barely-concealed claim of his implacable opponents inside the BJP to
propose an alternative candidate for prime minister, ostensibly to help
form a governing coalition. The Indian domestic political support for
the AAP intervention is from the counterparts of the so-called young and
liberal in Cairo’s Tahir Square. They are really all a product of
India’s manipulative and manipulated English language media, much of it
in hock to banks and foreign conglomerate owners.
How the AAP
originated and their personal international ties are indeed a matter of
interest, but not the only issue. The Magasaysay award is a known
instrument for affording recognition to Asians sensitive to the US
portrayal of the world. Volunteering to work for Mother Teresa is also
an agreeable item on a CV, indicating desirable political impulses to
Western governments. At the very least, the US has intervened in a
dynamically unstable Indian polity to affect outcomes. Funding a useful
political or voluntary local entity through an Indian business house is
standard practice for foreign countries. They reimburse the business
house by engaging with it in an unrelated profitable transaction. The
Saudis regularly employ such business deals in India on behalf of
Pakistan and the US does so as well in scores of countries. It offers
complete anonymity and its legality hard to question.
The final
solution to a difficult and high stakes political standoff will be to
assassinate Narendra Modi. The attempt already made in Patna is almost
certain to have had foreign participation and the background to it
presents a truly shocking picture of high level local complicity.
Attempts to assassinate Modi are likely to occur again. Determined
efforts continue to incite Islamic radicals to make such an attempt, by
funding endless court proceedings to ensure the accusations over the
2002 Gujarat riots remain alive.
The logistical backup for any
plan to murder Narendra Modi will likely originate in Pakistan, already
rejoicing at the colossal damage to Indian intelligence the UPA attempt
to curb him has inflicted. It is also extremely suspect that invitations
to Narendra Modi to visit came from three close US allies, two of them
with little compelling reason for extending them. The US itself persists
in using the issue of his visa to cause him whatever negative publicity
possible. Quite clearly, assassinating him abroad might have been
considered more logistically feasible and less damaging politically than
in India. The intention is to end the career of the most popular Indian
politician since independence and one that threatens to assert it.
--
Read complete article at : http://www.indiafacts.co.in/stopping-modi-at-all-costs/#sthash.ZiORTaLQ.szB6egYU.dpbs
---------------
About the Author : Dr Gautam Sen taught 'international political economy' at the London School of Economics.
---------------
Dr. Subramanian Swamy
Narendra Modi’s case is not fundamentally different because it is feared that Modi and his supporters will curtail the huge incursions into India by US agencies the UPA has facilitated. It is assumed that once Modi forms the government and becomes aware that India’s is well on the way to becoming a US banana republic satellite–in the age-old Central American and Asian tradition, subject to indirect rule–he will move to end it. The US has evidently infiltrated India on a massive scale, blackmailing politicians with covertly acquired information, sponsoring countless secular and religious foundations and the purchase of a huge swathe of the Indian media.
However, the erstwhile BJP as such was not really a drawback for the US because some of its prominent leaders had been surrounded by political advisories, who are very close to the US, virtual spokesmen for it. Others bent over backwards during the tenure of the NDA to please. Two of the BJP’s most senior decision makers (non-political), including the late Brajesh Mishra, even made offers of sending Indian troops to join the coalition in Afghanistan. The Americans themselves had not made such a request to India because it would have sent their vital ally in the Afghan war into veritable frenzy. This idea was very wisely vetoed personally by Atal Behari Vajpayee himself!
The Western intervention, which has destroyed much of Syria, killing more than 150,000 people, to the approving clamour of the Western human rights lobby, is another variant for re-imposing imperial control over a country. The invasion and destruction of Iraq was another, the death toll approximately 2 million so far.
The decision to accord India nuclear status occurred because of a US perception that it had finally managed to acquire a durable foothold in it and access to high level Indian decision-making during the tenure of the UPA. Indeed, it seems, the US was even able to determine appointments to the Union Cabinet, certainly in the case of the Commerce and the Environment portfolios and perhaps even the EAM’s selection is cleared now by the US ambassador in Delhi. The granting of nuclear status to India, which was well and truly an enormous gift was motivated by the US view of India as a new client satellite. The journey in this fateful direction began during the tenure of the NDA and has neared completion under a totally subverted Congress led UPA. To their credit, and India Gandhi had resisted this dire predicament during the first decades of Indian independence.
The UPA of course represents mainly the family, rather than India and is also deferential to the US, which is the fate of the family itself as well. Quite noticeably, the US has helpfully striven to conceal any embarrassing information on the likely UPA prime ministerial candidate. The purchase of untested Wastinghouse nuclear reactors as quid pro quo for the Indo-US Accord was a less significant secondary understanding. One also begins to understand why the UPA became an agent WalMarts rather than representing the vital interests of millions of Indian retailers.
This does not mean India accedes to all US dictates, for example over the purchase of Iranian crude. However, a deeper subservience to US preferences has been established and is being 'institutionalised'. The US has become the major shareholder in the equity of the GoI, much as it has been in Pakistan for decades.
The virtually instant announcement, after the swearing-in of Arvind Kejriwal and his juvenile crew, following their inept, comic preening for the media, was a hunger-strike in Bhopal and the decision to contest elections in Gujarat. The goal of AAP is now blindingly obvious. The intention is to split the anti-Congress vote to prevent Modi and the BJP winning enough seats in 2014 to form a viable government. The other alternative outcome would be to reduce their number sufficiently to facilitate the barely-concealed claim of his implacable opponents inside the BJP to propose an alternative candidate for prime minister, ostensibly to help form a governing coalition. The Indian domestic political support for the AAP intervention is from the counterparts of the so-called young and liberal in Cairo’s Tahir Square. They are really all a product of India’s manipulative and manipulated English language media, much of it in hock to banks and foreign conglomerate owners.
How the AAP originated and their personal international ties are indeed a matter of interest, but not the only issue. The Magasaysay award is a known instrument for affording recognition to Asians sensitive to the US portrayal of the world. Volunteering to work for Mother Teresa is also an agreeable item on a CV, indicating desirable political impulses to Western governments. At the very least, the US has intervened in a dynamically unstable Indian polity to affect outcomes. Funding a useful political or voluntary local entity through an Indian business house is standard practice for foreign countries. They reimburse the business house by engaging with it in an unrelated profitable transaction. The Saudis regularly employ such business deals in India on behalf of Pakistan and the US does so as well in scores of countries. It offers complete anonymity and its legality hard to question.
The final solution to a difficult and high stakes political standoff will be to assassinate Narendra Modi. The attempt already made in Patna is almost certain to have had foreign participation and the background to it presents a truly shocking picture of high level local complicity. Attempts to assassinate Modi are likely to occur again. Determined efforts continue to incite Islamic radicals to make such an attempt, by funding endless court proceedings to ensure the accusations over the 2002 Gujarat riots remain alive.
The logistical backup for any plan to murder Narendra Modi will likely originate in Pakistan, already rejoicing at the colossal damage to Indian intelligence the UPA attempt to curb him has inflicted. It is also extremely suspect that invitations to Narendra Modi to visit came from three close US allies, two of them with little compelling reason for extending them. The US itself persists in using the issue of his visa to cause him whatever negative publicity possible. Quite clearly, assassinating him abroad might have been considered more logistically feasible and less damaging politically than in India. The intention is to end the career of the most popular Indian politician since independence and one that threatens to assert it.
--
Read complete article at : http://www.indiafacts.co.in/stopping-modi-at-all-costs/#sthash.ZiORTaLQ.szB6egYU.dpbs
---------------
About the Author : Dr Gautam Sen taught 'international political economy' at the London School of Economics.
---------------
Dr. Subramanian Swamy
No comments:
Post a Comment