After a Headlines Today
broadcast in June 2013, a lot of truth about the Ishrat Jahan encounter
has been brought out. But here some concrete things which have been
missed. Let us see this case now in totality.
On 15 June 2004, 4 suspected terrorists were gunned down on the
outskirts of Ahmedabad. They included 19 year old Ishrat Jahan and 3
other men, 2 of whom were Pakistani nationals. After that, (as expected) the Leftist liberals in the media started claiming
that the encounter was fake and 19-year old Ishrat Jahan was 'innocent' without any evidence to it.
Their hatred for Narendra Modi is so much that they simply cannot digest
the fact that a 19 year old girl attacked and tried to kill Narendra
Modi, and would rather claim that the opposite is true. This howling
lasted for a few days. 1 day the Marathi edition of The Indian
Express, Loksatta reported on 14 July 2004 headlined: "Yes, Ishrat
indeed was a
terrorist". The next day Lashkar-e-Toiba admitted on 15 July that
Ishrat was indeed its member.
http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2004-07-14/india/27158324_1_ishrat-jehan-lashkar-woman-activist
Immediately after this, the media and the Congress dropped the issue like a hot cake. They did not bother to
apologize to Narendra Modi for falsely alleging that the encounter was fake and 'innocent' Ishrat Jahan was killed. The Samajwadi Party also organised a 'bandh' in Mumbai's Mumbra area in support of Ishrat Jahan before this confession by LeT. S
S Vaghela and Congress directly accused Modi of stage managing the
encounter. After this confession, the
matter died its death. At that time it was urged many times to the Sangh
Parivar to attack them- Left-liberal-secular brigade for naked direct support to terrorists, and false
allegations on innocent people like Narendra Modi. NCP MLA Jitendra Awhad gave financial compensation to Ishrat Jahan's family also in Mumbai. It was said that cases of treason should be tried for this. This
is also violation of 153-A needlessly infuriating a community,
defamation of Modi, and naked support to those waging war on the
nation.
In
June 2004 itself, not only the Gujarat Police, but even the Mumbai
Police (which works under Congress in Maharashtra) also said that there
were sufficient leads to know Ishrat Lahan's LeT links. Note the line in The Indian Express' report of 15 July 2004: "However, Gujarat and Mumbai police had said there were sufficient leads to suspect her involvement in militant activities".
But after the hullabaloo raised by
anti-Narendra Modi people, the Mumbai Police also kept quite on this
issue, while in 2004 it had said the opposite. This is a clear
indication that under political pressure from Congress and NCP, the
anti-terrorist operations of Mumbai Police were curbed and Mumbai Police
was forced to give up its drive against the suspected terrorist Ishrat
Jahan. Naked support to terrorists and interference in work of police by Congress and NCP for attacking Narendra Modi.
In
October 2004, before the Maharashtra Assembly polls, Samajwadi Party
Maharashtra chief Abu Asim Azmi again alleged that 'innocent Ishrat
Jahan was killed in cold blood by Modi' and cited this as a case of
'atrocities
against Muslims' despite the LeT
confession and due to lack of aggressiveness and passiveness, no one
did anything. Only once did a former Himachal Pradesh CM write an article
in Organiser in October 2004 where he dealed with this and said: "None
of them asked the question- if she was innocent, what was she doing with
3 other much older men in a car, 2 of whom were Pakistani nationals, at
4 am in the morning 500 km away from home?"
Then
out of the blue in 2009, Justice Tamang said in a report that the
Ishrat Jahan encounter was fake, when it was not his
jurisdiction to comment on it.
He also said that all people were innocent and had no links to
terrorists, ignoring the LeT confession completely. By that time, most
people had forgotten this confession. Then the SIT was asked to probe
this case, and it is reported to have said that the encounter was fake,
without knowing what it said about whether the people were terrorists or
not. Then gradually this case was taken up again, with not only the
encounter being termed fake, but the girl and 3 others also called
'innocent'.
In 2009 the Centre's (UPAs)
affidavit to Gujarat HC was full of contradictions and confusing
In 2010 David Headley also admitted that Ishrat was Lashkar's terrorist.
Then
the CBI was given the case and it duly followed its master's orders to
frame innocent people and defend the guilty terrorists. Now we have a
conflict between CBI and IB over this, and the Headlines Today
broadcast proved that they were all indeed
terrorists. But politicians like Sharad
Pawar again alleged shamelessly that the 19 year old college student
Ishrat was innocent and accused Narendra Modi of murdering her- NAKED
SUPPORT TO TERRORISTS BY NCP, SHARAD PAWAR. This is blatant violation of
153-A needlessly infuriating a community, 499-500 blatantly fake and
phony charges on innocent people, and direct support to terrorists. No
less a man than Sharad Pawar has said this.
Now
after
yesterday's Headlines Today story, NCP MLA Jitendra Awhad, the man who
gave compensation in 2004, alleged actually that the IB is on BJP's
orders and IB is not above law. This is another dangerous trend, a
public representative making such terrible charges against IB which is
also headed by a Muslim.
http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/ncp-politician-who-helped-ishrat-jahan-family-says-ib-working-on-behalf-of-bjp/1/280220.html
Jitendra
Awhad and Sharad Pawar are wrong on facts also. The Mumbai Police also
said that there were sufficient leads to zero in on Ishrat. This police
works under the Home Ministry of the state, which is held by
their own party NCP.
Now it is urged not to repeat the mistake made in 2004. File cases
against them, people like Sharad Pawar and NCP. This issue should be used
politically, this will also expose people who can go to any
extent to malign Narendra Modi. The big fish Sharad Pawar should not be
spared, nor should Jitendra Awhad. Shankarsinh Vaghela, Congress, Abu
Asim Azmi etc all are equally guilty.
And since they know they are on a very weak wicket, the judge seeing
this case in the Gujarat High Court is Abhilasha Kumari, daughter of
Congress Chief Minister of Himachal Pradesh, Virbhadra Singh. This shows
how deep and complex the trap has been set to frame innocents and
defend the guilty.
Source: http://secularjournalists.blogspot.in/2013/06/ishrat-jahan-case-naked-support-to.html
No comments:
Post a Comment