Sajjan Kumar: With help from the police

Justice Nanavati recommended that all the seven cases against Sajjan Kumar, including FIR No 307/94, be reinvestigated. This particular FIR had been lodged on the basis of an affidavit filed before the Ranganath Mishra Commission of Inquiry by a widow, Anek Kaur, in 1985. In the affidavit, she gave graphic details of how Sajjan Kumar, other Congress leaders and the police had turned murderous that day. Her house, she said, was surrounded by a mob led by Congress leader Jai Singh. The police were inciting the mob to kill Sardars and burn their houses. She also stated that Sajjan Kumar and another Congress leader Jai Kishan had come in a jeep and when she had run up to them for protection, Jai Kishan had said that only six Sardars were left and that he would get them killed. Sajjan Kumar had also stated that they should be beaten to death. Anek’s husband Vakil Singh was beaten and left for dead — he died three months later. Based on this and other evidence, Nanavati recommended a reinvestigation but the government in its Action Taken Report, denied the allegation and said that Anek Kaur had subsequently (in 1994) withdrawn her statement against Sajjan Kumar. Thus, the government felt that since there was no fresh evidence, it would not be just to reopen the case.
While the government found no justification to reopen the case, Tehelka investigations revealed that witness Anek Kaur was won over and her statement changed.
Tehelka traced out her family as Anek Kaur died about four years ago. Her mother-in-law Sahibzadi disclosed that one Rathi had obtained Anek Kaur’s thumb impression on a paper and used to buy rations for them regularly. Vakil Singh’s sister Mishri Kaur, who used to accompany Anek Kaur, told Tehelka that Sajjan Kumar had offered them a flat to change Anek’s statement. Another offer was made by Sajjan Kumar that he would sponsor their expenses for as long as they live in lieu of a changed statement. The family was paid for about two years. This entire conversation was captured on a spycam. The edited conversation goes:
Tehelka: What had Sajjan Kumar asked Anek Kaur, can you share that with us?
Mishri: Gawahi badal do, poora kharcha milega, muawza milega aur flat dilwa doonga (You will get a flat as well as compensation, just get Anek Kaur’s statement changed).
Tehelka: Did this happen before your eyes?
Mishri: Yes. This was in my presence, kehta tha, byan badal do, jab tak zinda rahoge, poori zindagi ka kharcha doonga, ek do saal diya bhee bus uske baad nahin (He said he’ll take care of all expenses as long as we lived, he gave money for about one or two years then stopped)
Tehelka: What happened after that? 
Mishri: Then Rathi came in the picture, Rathi, Inspector Rathi, would accompany Anek to the court, would also bring his vehicle. He used to give Rs 200 every month and in addition also hand over Rs 50 to Rs 100. Jai Kishan, the local mla, had also given Rs 1,200.
Tehelka: And then?
Mishri: Paisa Rathi kha gaya (Rathi took away all the money), usne Anek se angootha lagwa liya (Rathi had taken Anek’s thumb impression on a paper). I had complained against Rathi to the court and headquarter.
Tehelka: Did you not approach Sajjan Kumar for the promised flat and the money?

Mishri: Yes, twice I had gone to him but he refused to speak to me, baad mein aana (come later), I was thrown out of his place. This was some time around the last elections.
Tehelka: What happened to Anek Kaur?
Mishri: She was sick and died about four years ago. Before her death she told me and her daughter as well that take money from Sajjan or else depose against him, take it that he is the murderer of your parents.
Tehelka: So she changed her statement?
Mishri: She did not change her statement but Rathi took her thumb impression and gave her only Rs 200.
That the government was on the side of the guilty is also clear from another case. According to the Nanavati report, one Kher Singh had filed an affidavit before Jain-Banerjee Committee and stated, “that on that day in the morning, he had seen local mp Sajjan Kumar addressing a crowd of persons and telling them that Sikhs had killed their mata and that no Sikh in the area should be spared. At that time Ishwar Singh, Hardwari Lal and other local persons had raised slogans against Sikhs”. The report further states, “This witness therefore rushed back to his house. Dr Iqbal Singh Chadha, Resham Singh and Ajit Singh were burnt alive. When the mob came near his house, the neighbours told the mob that nobody was present in the house and so he was saved. He was rescued by the military on November 3, 1984. Kher Singh had later on approached the police and told them that he was a witness to the murder of those three persons but the police told him that as no case was registered with respect to their murder, her (sic) could not be recorded.”
Regarding this incident FIR no 178 was recorded only on November 15, 1984. No one was arrested in this case and the case was filed as untraced. Justice Nanavati observed in his report, “it appears that in respect of death of Iqbal Singh Chadha FIR No 178/84 and the case was then filed as untraced.
Kher Singh had specifically stated that he was the eyewitness to the murder of Dr Iqbal Singh Chadha yet his statement was not recorded with the result that he was not even cited as a witness. Thus even though eyewitness was available, the police did not investigate the case properly and closed it as untraced.”
While Justice Nanavati states an eyewitness was available, the Action Taken Report says the contrary. It states, “no eyewitness came forward to give give any specific evidence or clue about the incident. Therefore the case was sent as untraced which was accepted by the competent court.” Interestingly, the police refused to record the statement of eyewitness Kher Singh but lodged an FIR based on the complaint of Harvinder Kaur, wife of Dr Chadha, who had not named any person as she had not seen the incident.

Source:  http://tehelka.com/sajjan-kumar-with-help-from-the-police/

Media Nexus with Politicans

This research is being shared with us by a diligent reader on how deep the Media connections go. Puts the entire media bias in perspective It makes one imagine the scale of Narendra Modi 's triumph last December , when all these forces were against him on election propaganda

"1. Hindustan Times – Shobhna Bhartia, owner and editor-in-chief of Hindustan Times is a Congress MP from Rajya Sabha.

2. Vinod Sharma, HT Political Affairs editor, is essentially a Congress spokesman on all TV panel discussions, because once his boss’ term gets over, he will be looking out for her RS seat next

3. Barkha Dutt and Vir Sanghvi, famous Congress stooges (and intermediaries for UPA allies) who were exposed in the Radiagate scandal, and are virtual Congress spokespersons in their capacities as electronic media personalities, are the ones who write opinion and op-ed columns most frequently (once every week) on the editorial pages of HT. In return, Barkha and Sanghvi are rewarded with Padma Shris and other monetary compensation by the Nehru dynasty or Congress party.

4. NDTV’s promoters are Prannoy Roy and Radhika Roy. Radhika’s sister Brinda Karat is a famous CPM leader (well known for anti-Baba Ramdev views) and Brinda’s husband Prakash Karat is the CPM Politburo General Secretary (well known for preferring Congress over BJP). And Prannoy Roy’s first cousin is the famous far-leftist pro-Maoist-Naxalite pro-Kashmiri-terrorists “intellectual” Arundhati Suzanna Roy.

5. NDTV’s Barkha Dutt’s reality has already been exposed by me in above section.

6. NDTV’s Sonia Singh is the wife of Uttar Pradesh Congress MP, Union minister and ex-princely state ruler, Mr. R. P. N. Singh, who is one of the fastest rising stars in the Congress party. If you remember, Sonia Singh is a very high-profile anchor on NDTV whose pro-Congress anti-BJP bias is legendary.

7. NDTV’s Nidhi Razdan (high-profile anchor of Left Right Centre) is the current girlfriend of J&K CM Omar Abdullah (after Omar recently divorced his wife of several years and mother of his two children, Payal). Nidhi Razdan is also famous for her legendary pro-Congress and anti-BJP bias.

8. CNN-IBN : Rajdeep Sardesai’s wife and co-promoter of CNN-IBN, Sagarika Ghose, who anchors Face the Nation and is famous journalist of CNN-IBN (well, her hubby is the owner-editor-in-chief after all) are famous Congress stooges.

9. Sagarika’s father Bhaskar Ghose was a famous sarkari babu and was made the chief of Prasar Bharati (Doordarshan) during Indira and Rajiv regimes. Bhaskar Ghose was well-known for personal loyalty to the Nehru dynasty, and now his daughter and son-in-law are rewarded with their own channel to do Congress propaganda.

10. In fact Sagarika’s extended family even consists of her aunts Ruma Pal (former Supreme Court justice and a close friend of the Nehru family) and Arundhati Ghose (former diplomat and Indian ambassador to various countries, predictably, under Congress regimes).

11. Let’s now come to another famous CNN-IBN media personality who also writes columns frequently for Hindustan Times — Karan Thapar. What you may not know is that the Nehru family itself is related, through blood and marriages, to the high-profile Thapar family. India’s Army chief during the 1962 debacle against China, Gen. P. N. Thapar, is brother-in-law of Nayantara Sehgal, the daughter of Vijaylakshmi Pandit and niece of Jawaharlal Nehru. Gen. Thapar’s son is pro-Congress journalist Karan Thapar. Gen. Thapar’s sister is Romila Thapar, a famous “top” typical JNU Nehruvian communist ideologue historian, who gets to write our textbooks and pollute them with pro-Congress Marxist propaganda.

12. The HIndu – The Worst – N. Ram, owner and editor-in-chief (till February 2012) of The Hindu, was once a vice president of the Students Federation of India. SFI is the students’ wing of the CPM.

13. P. Sainath of the The Hindu (acclaimed journalist well known for his, again, unsurprisingly, typical left-wing Nehruvian communism ideology), is the nephew of Congress politician V. Shankar Giri and the grandson of V. V. Giri, ex-President of India and famous Congress politician. Giri was especially known to be one of the first few staunch loyalists of Indira, and whom Indira fielded for President elections against her own party’s Neelam Sanjeeva Reddy, and who ultimately became the cause of the first high-profile split in the Indian National Congress into Congress (O) and Congress (I) — almost all the pre-independence regional stalwarts split away to join Congress (O) or form their own state parties, and the rest including Giri (all the loyalists of the Nehru family staying on with Indira).

14. Or even what about little known News24 Hindi media channel? Owned by ex-journalist and editor Rajiv Shukla, famous Congress MP in Rajya Sabha, Union minister, industrialist, BCCI vice president and IPL chairman.

15. Or even what about little known Lokmat (and IBN Lokmat) that is Marathi newspaper (and channel) in Maharashtra? Owner and editors-in-chief are the brothers Vijay Darda (Congress MP) and Rajendra Darda (Congress MLA in Maharashtra, and minister in state govt).

16. Or even the other bigger and smaller media houses, such as The Times of India and Indian Express, where the Nehru dynasty has managed to infiltrate its loyalists such as Dileep Padgaonkar and Shekhar Gupta, who are essentially paid stooges of the Congress party.

17 Vinod Mehta - Outlook editor has been well known to take anti BJP stand

The Congress (in fact just the one single family — the Nehru dynasty) has been in power for 56 of the last 65 years of independence. This matters a LOT. Personal relationships have been built, blackmail-worthy secrets have been spied, monumental wealth has been accumulated … all by the one single Nehru dynasty (and its family-business-cum-political-party aka Congress) that helps it maintain its tight irongrip over not just the entire Indian mainstream media, but also deep into our bureaucracy, our governmental institutions, and even our journalism and mass media colleges and grad schools.

We have probably not even scratched the surface of the network of family and personal relationships through which the Nehru dynasty has completely dominated and controlled the entire intellectual, historian and journalist landscape of India. And we haven’t even talked about the monumental wealth or the blackmailing secrets. All because the one single dynasty got to rule over India for 60 years uninterrupted. It matters a LOT.

The typical JNU Nehruvian communist left-libbers ideologues have really perpetrated some kind of stranglehold on India’s journalism, media and intellectual space.

Almost all pro-BJP (or even centre-right ideologues) journalists have been slowly thrown out of their jobs due to pressure from the Congress and the Nehru family.

Even the great venerable Ramnath Goenka, frustrated and broken by repeated I-T raids and ED investigations ultimately had to fire Arun Shourie twice from the Indian Express, which was once the best Indian newspaper in the 1970s and 80s. That was the team — Goenka the owner, Shourie the editor, and S. Gurumurthy the fearless journalist, that brought political heavyweights like Indira Gandhi down on her knees and even took on corporate honchos like Dhirubhai Ambani. (Ramnath Goenka inspired the Mithun Chakraborty character and S. Gurumurthy inspired the R. Madhavan character in the Ambani biopic “Guru”.)

But very few centre-right ideologues are left in India’s media space today, that too in minor publications like The Pioneer. Almost all the mainstream media houses have been thoroughly infiltrated and coerced into towing the Congress’ line, sometimes just through ideology and relationships, and not even money power.

The Congress party essentially owns and controls every single mainstream media house in India, including Hindustan Times, The Times of India, NDTV, CNN-IBN, The Hindu, Tehelka, Outlook, etc"

Do not be surprised to see the smear campaigns on Modi grow louder once Narendra Modi For PM is declared by the BJP before the 2014 GE

 

https://www.facebook.com/IndiaBTL/posts/481166038604019

Supreme Court smacks down Swamy: “Who are you?”

“The original plan was that Marines would not return, Ambassador would be expelled and Italy will not expose ‘the family’,” tweeted a triumphant Subramanian Swamy when the Italian government announced its decision to send back the awol Italian marines. “Had I not turned up in SC and asked for restraining the Amb and an exchange of hot words with CJI, the matter would have…” he claimed, leaving his loyal Twitter brigade to perform the assigned task of granting credit where it was most undue. Thus it was that the Hindu right added a new tale of Swamy sorcery to its lore: Swamy’s PIL forced the Supreme Court to take action against the Italian ambassador, which in turn created the needed leverage to bring Rome to its knees. And everyone lived happily ever after etc.

Subramanian Swamy. PTI

That’s until the Chief Justice of India decided to rain on Swamy’s victory parade.
The smackdown was delivered in the courtroom soon after the bench rescinded the ban preventing the Italian Ambassador Daniele Mancini from leaving the country. The move spurred Swamy into action, and eagerly remind the Court of his now legendary contempt application against the Italian envoy. CJI Altamas Kabir’s response was not quite as anticipated, as the Telegraph reports:

“Who are you?” the Chief Justice asked Swamy, who said he had moved the contempt application. “I am asking you, who are you?” the judge responded. “I am sorry you are not an advocate. You have no right to appear. You have no right to argue. What will happen if any person on the road comes and says I want to argue. You might have done it earlier, but we will not allow you.”

In a nation where “Do you know who I am?” is the ultimate assertion of power, that’s pretty much the mother of all insults. But Kabir wasn’t finished downgrading Swamy. He went on to order him out of the front row, which is “meant for lawyers, not for litigants. You have no right to sit there”.
Declared a nobody and ordered out of the VIP seats! Surely enough cause to scream conspiracy, and so Swamy predictably did: ”There is a collusion here,” he declared. The proclamation did little to endear him to an already irate judge, leaving Swamy with only one way out — as in, right out of the courtroom.
The moral of this mini melodrama: Never rob a Supreme Court judge. Chief justices don’t take kindly to anyone stealing their judicial glory.
The lesson, however, seems to have been lost on Swamy who soon took to Twitter to restore his eroded position. “I don’t mind being insulted by CJI for defending the honour of Bharat Mata,” he first declared, but soon dialled up the rhetoric, egged on by his supporters.
When @actindia claimed, “CJI Altamas Kabir actually want to scare-off Dr Subramanian @Swamy39, so that the corrupt dynasty’s future can be secured,” Swamy replied, “But had the opposite effect,” implicitly endorsing the original slur. A couple of tweets later, he moved on to directly accusing the Court of bad faith: “The failure of the SC to list or reject formally my Contempt Petition despite bringing it to the notice of the court is serious miscarriage.”
For a high-profile troublemaker like Swamy, heaping invective on heads of politicians is a low-risk strategy. None of his favourite targets is likely to sue him for libel — which will only give him the flood of attention he craves. But tweaking your nose at Supreme Court justices is a dangerous sport, more so for a one-man party who relies on his legal talent to stay in the limelight. If it chooses to, the highest court has plenty of perfectly legal ways to shut Swamy out — or, if sufficiently irate, shut him up. Chief justices can be notoriously thin-skinned about insinuations questioning their integrity, as Indian media outlets have discovered in recent years. Tweeting tall tales is a fine pastime, as long as it doesn’t end in a suo motu contempt petition of the wrong kind.

Source:  http://www.firstpost.com/india/supreme-court-smacks-down-swamy-who-are-you-684305.html

The End of the Gandhis Can Rahul Gandhi run India? Can anybody?

BY JAMES TRAUB | MAY/JUNE 2013

On Jan. 19, Rahul Gandhi, the 42-year-old heir apparent of the Gandhi-Nehru dynasty, the family that has ruled India for 37 of the 66 years since India gained independence, was appointed vice president of the All India Congress party, which his family has run for even longer than it has run India. A more honest way of describing this moment is that Rahul -- India is on a first-name basis with all members of the Gandhi family -- finally agreed to accept a senior position that had long been his for the asking.

COMMENTS (2) SHARE:

Share on twitter Twitter

 

Share on reddit Reddit

 

inShare

 

More...

In so doing, he implicitly acknowledged that he is the party's future and quite possibly its candidate for prime minister at a time when the world's largest democracy seems rudderless, with its meteoric economic growth leveling off and a suddenly aroused middle class taking to the streets to protest rampant corruption and a pervasive culture of abuse toward women. Elections are scheduled for 2014. And though voters have rarely, if ever, expressed such contempt for Congress in polls and state ballots, the Gandhi name still casts a powerful spell over the country. But even his closest associates don't know for sure whether Rahul wants to be prime minister or what he would do if he had the job. He may rejuvenate the longest-running dynasty in the democratic world -- or he may terminate it.
Rahul remains a mysterious and deeply private figure. He gives infrequent speeches; rarely rises in the Lok Sabha, the lower house of Parliament, where he has served since 2004; and virtually never holds on-the-record interviews with reporters, whom he plainly distrusts. Although fireworks lit up the sky on the day of his ascension and party functionaries toted signs proclaiming, "You are our pride, the glory of youth power," Rahul seems determined to disappoint his most fervent and sycophantic supporters; he recently said that asking about his prime-ministerial ambitions was "a wrong question." A party spokesman quickly clarified that whatever Rahul's own view, "All Congress workers desire that Rahul Gandhi become the PM one day, and we are sure that our wish will be fulfilled."

Not long after Rahul's promotion, I contacted Kanishka Singh, a 34-year-old former Lazard banker who serves as Rahul's gatekeeper, to inquire about an interview. Singh said that he couldn't promise me anything. "We don't want to blow our own trumpet," he said, "because Rahul is not a trumpet-blowing kind of person."

Rahul ultimately granted me a brief, strictly off-the-record audience at the colonial-era white bungalow that serves as his personal office a few blocks away from the party's own New Delhi headquarters. I was brought to a small sitting room. Soon, Rahul came in, sat down on a white couch, and waited for me to speak. He wore sandals and floppy white kurta pyjamas; I had the impression that he could have bought the outfit in the market for $5 and gotten back change. He had been clean-shaven when he accepted his party post, but now sported a scruffy Che Guevara beard. The overall look was Gandhian revolutionary: virtuous, pure, a little fierce. We spoke, not about policy or personal ambition, but about Rahul's project of reforming the Congress party from within. On this subject he was passionate, even vehement. I had been led to expect someone shy and even tentative, but Rahul's manner was unceremonious, unsmiling, challenging, even abrasive, as if he expected a fight -- which perhaps he did. He seemed to have assigned himself Mahatma Gandhi's mission without possessing a grain of Gandhi's temperament. I wondered whether so wary a man was suited to the lunatic carnival of Indian politics.


And that is a very pressing question. After nine years in power, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh's United Progressive Alliance, a coalition of Congress and nine smaller parties, has been rocked by one scandal after another, including the fraudulent allocation of cell-phone broadcast licenses, a boondoggle that has cost India somewhere between $6 billion and $35 billion. Congress was born in India's freedom struggle, but both the party and the government froze in the face of the recent mass protests, as if all the years in power had atrophied the party's political instincts. At the same time, the economic growth that has paid for Singh's rise and the expensive welfare programs Congress favors has sagged to 5 percent; nobody talks anymore about India "catching up" to China. No wonder, then, that Singh's poll numbers have sunk to an all-time low. India Today, a leading newsweekly, recently wrote that his government has devolved into "a global headline of corruption and bad governance." The country has reached an impasse.

"We don't have leaders in this government," Bimal Jalan, a former governor of the Reserve Bank of India, told me. "There's no sense that the cabinet has the collective authority to govern." The only figure who can knock heads and force the government to act as one, he says, is Rahul, not because of Rahul's own skills but simply because he is a Gandhi. Dynastic rule has produced a pathology of dependence that the dynasty's latest member is trying, perhaps fruitlessly, to cure.
Sanjeev Gupta/EPA 

Source:  http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2013/04/29/the_end_of_the_gandhis

Republics in ancient India

Markandey Katju
19 April 2013, 11:16 AM IST 


Our country India is a fascinating country. In this piece I wish to refer to the overwhelming material to show that in many regions there were republics, that is, areas without kings, in ancient India.

This material consists of (1)The Mahabharata, (2)The Buddhist Canon, both in Sanskrit and in Pali, (3)The accounts of Greek and Roman historians regarding Alexander the Great's invasion of India in 326 B.C. (4)Panini's Ashtadhyayi, (5)Kautilya's Arthashastra, etc

Let us first take the Mahabharat. In Chapter 107/108 of Shantiparva there is a detailed narration by Bheeshma Pitaamah to Yudhishthir about the features of republics (called ganas) in India. Bheeshma states that when there is unity among the people of a republic that republic becomes powerful and its people become prosperous. Such people are intelligent, brave,enthusiastic, honest, and trained in the use of arms. They do not cheat each other, and help those in distress. This way they prosper.
Having said this Bheeshma then narrates how republics are destroyed :

" Bhedey ganaah vineyshur hi bhinnaastu sujayaah paraih
Tasmaat sanghaatyogen prayateran ganaah sadaa"

I.e. "Republics are destroyed only by internal conflicts between the people
Therefore republics should always seek to maintain good relations among the people"

and also :

"Teshaam ayonyabhinnaanaam swashaktim anutishthataam
Nigrahah panditaih kaaryah kshipramev pradhaanatah"

which means :

" Therefore the wise people in a republic should crush the chiefs of the wicked persons who try to divide the people"

This is a fascinating narrative in the Mahabharat. It shows that in ancient India there were not only kingdoms (like Hastinapur and Indraprastha) but also regions where there was no king but a republic. As to details about the organization and functioning of these republics the material available is vague and scanty, but that there were republics can not be doubted. As long as people of these republics were united they were strong and prosperous, but they became endangered when there were dissensions among the people.

The Buddhist Canon, both in Sanskrit (in which much of Mahayana Buddhist literature was written) and in Pali (in which much of Hinayana literature was written) has extensive reference to republics in India, e.g. the Lichchavi city of Vaishali. Thus in the Pali Buddhist work 'The Mahanibbana Sutra' it is mentioned that when King Ajaatshatru of Magadha was planning to attack the Vajjian democratic republic he sent a messenger to the Buddha for his opinion. Instead of speaking to this messenger, the Buddha said to one of his disciples:" Have you heard Anand that the Vajjians foregather often and frequent the public meetings of their clan? So long Anand, as the Vajjians so foregather, and so frequent, the public meetings of their clan, so long they may be expected not to decline but to prosper".

Similarly, in the Avadaana Shatak, a Sanskrit Buddhist text of the second century A.D. it is mentioned that a group of merchants went from North India to the Deccan, and were asked by the King of the Deccan as to who was the king who ruled over North India. The merchants replied :
" Deva, kechit deshaah ganaadheenaah, kechit raajaadheenah, iti"
which means :
" Your Majesty, certain areas are under a republican form of government, while others are under kings"

Alexander the Great's invasion of India in 326 B.C. has provided a lot of material to show that there were many parts of India under republican forms of government, not kings. The Greek historian Diodorus Siculus writes that at the time of Alexander's invasion most cities in North West India had democratic forms of government (though some areas were under kings, e.g. Ambhi and Porus) and this is also mentioned by the historian Arian. Alexander's army faced its fiercest resistance from the armies of these republics, e.g. the Mallas, and gained victory only after suffering huge casualties.

Panini and Kautilya have also referred to these republics (ganas) in many parts of India.

I have referred to all this to show that if today's Indian Republic and its people wish to be strong and prosperous they must be united, and not divided on the basis of religion, caste, language, region, race, etc as some wicked people are trying to do.

Source: http://blogs.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/satyam-bruyat/entry/republics-in-ancient-india

Modi assassination threat jolts cong, Govt mum

 

Source: Rajesh Prabhu Salgaonkar  |  4/18/2013 12:58:18 PM

Mumbai, April 18 : Cyberspace was heavily buzzed today morning with the speculation about likely assassination bid on Narendra Modi twitted by senior journalist Madhu Kishwar and central Govt’s stunning silence over the news. Madhu Kishwar said, quoting an anonymous ‘very senior central Govt official’ that Modi may be assassinated if Teesta and Congress fail to trap him in any FIR.

Madhu Kishwar, who is recently getting attention due to her balanced and clear reports about Gujarat and Narendra Modi, twitted today morning :-

“Yesterday met some senior Govt officers who said Modi's assassination real possibility if Teesta Congress fail to get fraud FIR agnst modi

(https://twitter.com/madhukishwar/status/324571970257707008)

“State govt officers have said similar things earlier but I was shocked to hear this from non gujrati central govt officers

(https://twitter.com/madhukishwar/status/324573081521754113)

But Madhu Kishwar deleted her own twits after an hour, citing that the twits may create un-necessary panic in the society. However she remained firm on the information while replying to various queries from tweeples.

She further said in a reply, “It is Congress & its NGO allies that are instigating terrorist jihadis against Modi.”

“I am serious because the persons who said this are very senior and well informed insiders”

It looks like from her twits that follow, that Kishwar was pressurised by Congress workers and seculars immediately to delete the twit citing imaginary backlash against a particular minority community.

But stunning was the silence by the secular section of media, the Government machinery and the congress party which have failed to declare that, democratically elected Chief Ministers and political leaders will be protected at any cost against any terrorist threat.

One local RSS volunteer says that, while Narendra Modi gains popularity day by day, the common man in the society is also worrying for the most popular leader’s security, as the history of Congress in India is blotted with the unsolved cases of physical elimination of the powerful and intelligent opposition leaders as well as leaders within the Congress like Netaji Subhashchandra Bose Shyama Prasad Mukherjee, Pt. Deen Dayal Upadhyay, Lal Bahadur Shastri, Madhavrao Shinde, Rajesh Pilot in the past. All these are unsolved cases of mysterious deaths.

It’s important to watch the central Govt response and the action it takes to protect one of the most popular leaders in the current political scenario.

Harsh Mander’s CES received Rs 12.33 crore foreign/Church fund in two years

By Japan K Pathak

Ahmedabad, DeshGujarat, 17 April 2013

With official documents in hand, in this series I am trying to narrate the details of crorepati non-government organizations functioning in Gujarat – author
The last article was about details of foreign funding to Shabnam Hashmi’s NGO ANHAD. In that article we mentioned that one of the founders of ANHAD was Mr. Harsh Mander, a former IAS officer and Action Aid India man.
According to Wikipedia page, Harsh Mander was a signatory to the campaign to save Afzal Guru, a terrorist convicted and later hanged for the 2001 Indian Parliament attack. Mander also supports the demand for removal of the Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act, 1958 from Kashmir and North-eastern states. Harsh is convener of the drafting committee for the Communal Violence (Prevention) bill. Harsh Mander applied for mercy to Pakistani terrorist Ajmal Kasab courting a huge controversy.
Wikipedia page further tells that Harsh became member of National Advisory Council of the UPA government in 2010 and special commissioner to the Supreme Court.He was removed from the NAC in 2012. He worked formerly in the Indian Administrative Service in the predominantly tribal states Madhya Pradesh and Chhatisgarh for almost two decades.
Harsh Mander heads NGO called “Aman Biradari”. He is founder member of Shabnam Hashmi led organization ANHAD.
But this article is about Mr. Mander’s another organization – ‘Centre for Equity Studies’(CES). This is a foreign funded (with partial funding from Christian organizations and church) NGO, headquartered in Delhi. We have obtained two-year data of foreign funding to Mander’s Centre for Equity Studies(CES).
In year 2011-12, CES received Rs 7,55,17,631.25 foreign funding. As per CES’s submission before government’s concerned department, justice for victim in states including Gujarat was one of the cause for which foreign fund was received and utilized. Research and homes for street children were other works for which money was received and spent in Gujarat area.
As Gujarat is involved somewhere, we are covering Harsh’s Delhi headquartered CES in our series.



In 2011, Mr. Mander’s NGO received highest amount of aid from Netherlands based ‘Partnership Foundation’ for “welfare of children”. From online resources we learn that Partnership Foundation was set up by Ferd van Koolwijk, a Dutch businessman, who initiated the Rainbow Home Program in February 2002 for school children at Sister Cyril’s Loreto Day School in Kolkata. Sister Cyril is from Ireland based Christian religious organization – Institute of the Blessed Virgin Mary (Loreto). Harsh Mander is the main partner of Partnership Foundation in New Delhi. Rainbow Home program is for homeless girls upto age of 18. Partnership Foundation has donated crores and crores of rupees to Mr. Mander’s NGO apparently to run Rainbow homes.
Then CES has received nearly Rs 90 lakh are as donation from Denmark based Christian organization DAN Church AID.
Rs 10 lakh received from America based Association for India’s Development(AID). This organization called AID also supports Medha Patkar in her Narmada movement and anti-Delhi Mumbai corridor movement. AID supported the movement to free Binayak Sen who was allegedly connected to Naxals and therefore jailed, but released later. Arvind Kejriwal is AID Saathi. What is AID Saathi? Well, AID recognizes certain activists in India with “Saathi” awards and support them in a manner that allows them freedom to operate without the constraints of a specific time-bound project. The program creates a mutually enriching relationship between AID and the Saathi and entails not only support in the form of a stipend, but also non-monetary involvement and strategic support from AID volunteers.
Germany’s BODO Huetten Foundation which works with children in education sector is another donor. Action Aid India is ofcourse at Mr. Mander’s help. International Development Research Centre – another donor to CES is headquartered in Canada. Members of IDRC’s Board of Governors are appointed by the Government of Canada.
One interesting source of donation is the Hong Kong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited (HSBC) – the bank that was in news for alleged dubious money transfers.
America based Indian Muslim Relief & Charities is another donor of Mander’s NGO. The same Muslim organization helped Shabnam Hashmi’s ANHAD also.
Now let’s move on to year 2010-11 records. Mr. Mander’s NGO CES received foreign funding of Rs 47817508.11 in this year.


Partnership Foundation is ofcourse the top donor. IDRC also there. Then there’s an organization called Sangat which is based in Bradford, UK. American Federation of Muslims of Indian Origin is another donor of CES this year with less than Rs 10 lakh donation.
Then there’s again a Church. One NGO ‘ICCI and Kerkin Actie’ has donated around Rs 70 lakh in a year to Mr. Mander’s NGO for research, seminars and other activities. Kerkin Actie (in Dutch) means Church in Action.
Concluding – in two years Mr. Harsh Mander’s one NGO CES received Rs 123335139.36 fund from abroad. We don’t have any detail about locally sourced funds of CES.
Previous article in this series:Shabnam Hashmi’s ANHAD is majorly Church funded
Next article: Madhusudan Mistry’s Disha received Rs 3.74 crore foreign money in two years

Source:  http://deshgujarat.com/2013/04/17/harsh-manders-ces-received-rs-12-33-crore-foreignchurch-fund-in-two-years/

Main Purpose of my translating into Tamil the book ‘Understanding Muhammad & Muslims’ By Ali Sina

by Sesraj : Apr 19, 2013 : 0 Comments

Main Purpose of my translating into Tamil the book

‘Understanding Muhammad&Muslims’

Authored By Dr. Ali Sina -

As ‘முகம்மதுவையும் முஸ்லிம்களையும் அறிவோம்’ 

By Siraj al Haq

—0—

          Dr Ali Sina has written a classic book and named it as “Understanding Muhammad and Muslims” (UMM). This book is the result of his continuous research on the contents of Islamic Trilogy (Quran, Hadiths and Sirat) over a very long period, thus culling out fresh evidences from the authentic sources which were either hitherto not known to many or hidden from non-Muslims so far. He had dedicated his entire life to appraise the world about the Islamic menace through his website www.faithfreedom.org , for over a decade and in the process showing the present day Muslims and the non-Muslims together without any distinction as to how to judge Islam and Muslims in proper & purified perspective and vision. He is the fittest person to do so, as he knows both the sides of the same coin, Orthodoxy and Apostasy.

He is also the first and only person in the world so far, to subject Muhammad to psycho-analysis who was dead in 7^th century, an extremely difficult task which none will dare to take up after a lapse of 1400 years. This he did with aplomb with factual evidences based only on Islamic Trilogy and from nowhere-else.  Then he compared the contents of Islamic Trilogy with the science of psychiatry and its branches, and in the process quoting from the contemporary world renowned psychiatrists’ researched and much acclaimed results published so far to prove his incontestable points with no loose ends left out even unknowingly.

I salute him whole-heartedly for all his selfless dedication to make the life of people purposeful.

He not only analysed as to how the atrocities in the name of Islam against the innocent human beings of the world had been perpetrated so far and examined the causes as to how and why these inflictions are happening continuously even to this day.

After thoroughly studying the contents of the original English book UMM, I was stunned by the stark facts exhibited from the authentic sources, as well as the sincerity of the author, in marshalling such evidences so cogently. So, it is natural that I really felt the effect as of a Tsunami in my mind.

In the process I also learnt from him how to recreate the historical happenings unwritten so far out of research on a chosen subject for the benefit of mankind, after a great amount of planning and preparedness with alacrity.  

As a Tamilian from Tamil Nadu State, a South-Eastern State of India, I have been praying that someone should write on the disparity of treatment of non-Muslims in India, due to direct Islamic impacts for centuries even though the non-Muslims are in majority and consequently in Tamil State. But regrettably there is no original book in Tamil or a translation of such great English works e.g. like Calcutta Quran Petition & Hindu Temples-what happened to them by Sitaram Goelji, Understanding Islam through Hadith & Muslim Separatism (Ramswarupji), Arab Imperialism & Islam and Human rights by Anwar Sheikh etc., into Tamil, depicting the true facts of Islamic cult to appraise the native Tamilians.

As if God had been listening to my mental rumination for a long time I got this book of ‘Understanding Muhammad and Muslim’ (UMM) and after I finished reading it, I lost no time in requesting Dr. Ali Sina to grant me the permission to translate his classic book in English  into Tamil. He also consented graciously.

Even though these foolhardy Muslims are a minority community in India, they believe in their bloated bravado of terrorism and feel that they can inflict heavy destruction and death on the majority by coercing them to submission effectively like their role-model Muhammad, the (so called) Prophet of Allah once did in 7^th century. For example: The likes of Hyderabadi Owaisi Brothers – (Asad & Akbar) by their verbal vomits – They feel they can ‘make the majority – the non-Muslims to submit to Islam in an hour’s time with their type of ‘violence’ and ‘terrorism’, thus exhibiting the childish immaturity of their minds with outlandish claims. The swift hands of non-Muslims will not be plucking flowers for offering to their favourite God during prayer at this point of time. Besides the above, these fanatics want to implement the Shariah Law also in India unmindful of serious consequences first to themselves from Indian Polity. So, it is high time the majority teach a lesson or two to this type of Muslims at least regarding how to behave in a democracy. Islamic cult is based on the methods of destruction whereas for other religions the methods are based on the construction and spiritual uplifting for peace in everybody’s life. 

I was born in Tamil Nadu brought up in a rural atmosphere and graduated as professional in one of the premier institutions of India and went to a Western country and made that land as my permanent home for a very long time and contributing my mite (whatever little I could do) for its well-being as a dutiful citizen of my adopted land, and also still attached to my everlasting love for mother tongue, the Tamil language. I dedicate this book of Tamil translation to the people of Tamil Nadu for their awakening as far as Islamic cult is concerned. After imbibing the contents of this book in Tamil, they can safeguard themselves against Islamic ‘Taqquiah’, as well as they can also know how Muslim mind works. I am very thankful to Dr. Ali Sina for giving me such an opportunity to translate his Magnum Opus into Tamil.

          We read frequently in Tamil magazines and in their Tamil websites, the articles and or small catchy sentences written by Muslim writers that “Islam means peace”. I give the following extracts from the book; ‘Lifting the veil’ (Page 6) authored by the distinguished author I.Q. Al Rassooli in three levels: Linguistic, Historical and Actual.

1. “Linguistically: ‘Islam’ does not mean ‘Peace’ and never meant as ‘peace’. This disingenuous explanation is spread by people who are either utterly ignorant of the Arabic Language, or to purposefully deceive the unwary listener or reader. In Arabic Islam has its root in the verb ASLAMA which actually means only one thing: submission, i.e., submission to the will of one God as Quran as well as the Muhamamdan exegetes asserts this”.

2. “Historically, according to Quran Ahadith, Arab & Islamic records, the spread of Muhammadan Islam in the Jazeera al Arabia – Arabic peninsula – was achieved by shedding of a sea of Arabian blood to start with, followed later on with Arabian conquests through shedding of an ocean of blood of the conquered and subjugated peoples”.

3. “Actually, as we see, listen to and read in all world’s media, almost 93% of all acts of terror and war around the world from Philippines and Indonesia to India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, and Iraq to name just a few in Asia, then to Africa, Europe and the Americas, are all committed (crimes) by Muhammadan Muslims.

          So, by all these three incontestable arguments the “Islam means peace” is nothing but deception through thuggery.   

          As Dr. Ali Sina rightly states in his book ‘UMM’ ‘All Muslims are not terrorists, but all proved terrorist acts perpetrated on the innocent people so far are by Muslims only’.

          There are also 73 sects in Islam itself and there is a never ending war amongst them for the past 1434 years. (Some Muslim sects are sunny, shia, Kharijitis, Mutazilah, Wahabis, Sufis, Hashshashins, Bahaism, Ismailis, Ahmedia etc.) This war and consequent mutual killing will continue till the whole Islamic cult is wiped out from the face of earth and finally one true Islam will emerge fit to go heaven as clearly stated by Abu Dawud Hadith 4579 & 4580.

          ‘In fact more Muslims are killed by other Muslims than by any outsiders to the faith of Muhammadan Islam’ – another Quote from I.Q. Al Rassooli. How then the Muslims still mouth “Islam is a peace”?

          For the past 1434 years in the name of Islam, 28 crores (equivalent to 2800 Millions innocent people) have been killed in this world and in India alone it is 800 million (8 crores) innocent Indians. This does not include the Muslims killed by Muslims in the world as stated in the above paragraph. Yet Muslims still sing (blah-blah) threnodies to call ‘Islam means Peace’ and Muslims are victimised throughout the world including in India!!

          In all Tamil websites, the articles and the catchy sentences about Islam, they never give the references numbers of Quran or Hadiths or Sirat. They can now at least quote the briefest Apha-Numeric Index numbers (as reference) given in ‘Reliance of the Traveller’ (RT). e.g., Taqquiah Holy Islamic deception as: – r8.2.

When I had enquired with many Tamil Nadu Muslims around me (where I live now) about this book – ‘Reliance of the Traveller’ they actually did not know such a book is in existence. This book was actually written as early as 1368 byAhmad Ibn Naqib al-Nisrias Umdat al-Salik wa/Uddat al-nasik (tools for Islamic Worshipper) and later translated in English by Nuh Ha Mim Keller as ‘Reliance of the Traveller. This book is regarded as “Shariah Guide or Manual of Shariah by Islam approved pundits with their written certificates to this effect.

Once the reference Numbers are given, there may be many questions from inquisitive people there: such as Mecca Quran and Medina Quran verses. Probably this is the reason to avoid to all possible further queries / questions, the Tamil Muslim writers do not give any reference numbers in their articles.

Let the Muslim Writers in Tamil Nadu need not be an Ostriches to believe the world has become dark the moment they shut their eyes. Let them reckon that 21^st century of today is not 7^th century of Muhammad.

The world has woken up and quite aware of Islamic designs like never before. It is very gratifying to note that at least a few Tamilians are aware that all important books are now available on Islamic trilogy throughout the (Network) websites and also know the real causes for terrorism after having completely assimilated such books. For a discerning reader of these Islamic cult Books, and watching their actions today everywhere, now they know why and how all these things do happen. Islamic Trilogy is clearly vibrating with verses like ’Kill all those who are not Muslims, ambush them when they are not ready, rape any non-Muslim women of any age (even a child), enslave Kaffirs, and reject Democracy in Toto, put an end to any kind of dissension of Islamic thoughts or by deeds by torture and killings etc.,’ 

‘The spoon gets what is in there the vessel’.

The Tamil websites and Magazines are still compelled to release the articles of Muslim writers as per the hand-outs handed over to the Editors without any questions being asked about the correctness of contents. The Editors and owners of these Magazines and websites are aware what these Islamists are capable of.

Only a few years ago a large circulating Tamil Daily office was raided by the goatee-bearded Muslims and did havoc to the men and machines there because that ‘Daily’ had reported an unlawful incident with evidences to prove as to what had been reported was absolutely true. The Islamists had badly beaten-up the news editor-in-charge for the reported incident and got an apology letter from him too. In the process these goatees had heavily damaged all computers and furniture in the whole office. They then proudly released that apology letter in their Islamic propaganda magazine as a triumph over the non-Muslim daily with huge (Islamic Drum) celebrations because all such dailies / magazines will have to print whatever Islamists wanted them to release hereafter about Islam. Or else………!

Why is all due to?

1. Is it because the Indian Democratic Government is so foolishly spending a quite a lot of money every year from the common treasury out of the accumulated tax collections of 80.5% Kaffir-citizens, to dole out to Muslims to go on ‘Hajj’ pilgrimage, (robbing Peter and doling to Paul); at the same time taxing these majority non-Muslims for visiting their holy shrines within INDIA itself. Is it not a height of sadism coupled with treachery? Is there any other Muslim country which doles out to their Muslims citizens to go for “Hajj” pilgrimage?  If so I need to be enlightened.    

2. Once upon a time there were National Newspapers dedicated to the cause of Indian Nationalism, and democratic traditions and values of the world. All these major newspapers are now owned by non-Indians such as Saudi Muslims, Swiss Australian Christians etc., or by those with leftists’ leanings and for showing-off their one-up-ness in Indian politics. This is the same case with Television Companies control. The foreigners know that how to control the Indian mass by controlling the press and information media. In the process the gullible Indian public is the real victim by the reprehensible and insatiable avariciousness of newer generations of old patriotic media owners of India, when with dollar bundles were thrown on them.

3. Is there any direct / indirect support given to Muslims through the President of the ruling Congress party in India who is an Italian by birth (Edvige Antonia Albina Maino Sonia Gandhi) and married to Nehru dynasty (Roberto / Rajiv Gandhi) sibling presently heading the ruling party in India?  Now Congress President’s son who was the General-Secretary of the party so far and now elevated as the Vice-President of Congress Party (Raul Vinci as Italian name and Rahul Gandhi in India)! Congress Party is ruling India for almost 60 years from 1947 that is after Independence from British?

          Now, the common Indian’s position is like once fried in a frying pan of Islamists & British and had fallen now into the burning fire of Nehruvian / congress majority rule closely related to Muslims for generations.

Unlike yesteryears, now it is the trend to depict or glorify violence or using language of vengeance and murder in stories of films made to satisfy the base-animal-instinct to the present young generation only for making money by any means by the film makers. The film makers now learnt from Islam that violence, vengeance and murder also pay rich dividends as power and pelf. Due to these trends, the guilty-conscious terrorist Muslims now begin to feel somehow that they are being portrayed / targeted directly or in veiled manner regarding their terrorist activities. Thus the Islam friendly non-Muslim film producers whether they like or not will have to compromise at least to exist or co-exist with violent Muslims of the day or to stay alive in one piece!!

 Recently in case of a film producer, actor, dancer, great kisser in films, Black shirted Party enthusiast of a political party etc., (all rolled in one) was made to toe the line of Islamists in Tamil Nadu. There was no way but to submit for a compromise with Islamists!!

Take it from me now and engrave these words in granites. In the coming days the same Islamic friendly non-Muslim strange bedmates in films will be the first victims of ‘Halal’ treatment (torture by cutting the throat in slow motion and not in just one ‘Haram’ stroke) in their worst circumstances, i.e. if they are to be treated as Islamic Kaffirs. Then it will be too late as spilt-milk. It is proved 100 % from the History. History will be repeated in their cases too. To give a recent example, Muslims have done it in Iran for their own leftist helpmates / friends when they were very close to each other even just before the Islamists came to power. First thing the Islamists do is to ease out all those ‘use and throw” one-time helpmates who are now branded as leftist Kaffirs/non -believers of Islam, when actually occupied the seat of power. This must be done or else they cannot be true Muslims.

Why these things do happen? Who will benefit from all these horrors? Who will benefit from keeping the world in economic crisis? My instant answer will be ‘ISLAM’. I had thought about this problem for a very long time. Hence this instant answer.

ISLAMIC BANKING:

As per the usage – ‘Old wine in new bottle’ ‘Islamic Banking concept’ is spreading its tentacles through modern phraseology by interpreting them to fit into Quranic Ayats of 1400 year old Islam. We know how ingenuous these Muslims are, when it comes to interpreting modern science and beyond to the origins of Universe and the verses in Islamic Trilogy. According to Islam the world is like carpet – i.e., flat.   

It is stated that there is no ‘interest collected’ in Islamic Banking for loan, but money is collected in the name of Money leasing cost. Whatever be the name, money is money, thus collected in the place of Interest in some other name!

‘The money which is being collected by selling a DOG is not going to bark’ so said as Tamil colloquial usage.

So, Islamic banks have to hold them necessarily as income. What is there in a name? “Interest is an Interest is an Interest” like ‘Rose is a Rose is a Rose’. Islamic books say that Muslims will not engage in the trade of Alcohol, tobacco, Gambling, Pork meat etc., and consequently Islamic banking will not advance money to these trades in Islamic countries, but actually if the Muslims residing in Democratic countries like India (Dar-ul-harb) and engage themselves in these trade they shall be allowed to collect/pay interest as clearly stated in ‘Reliance of Traveller’, with Alpha numeric Index Numbers, (w43.1). If at all the Kaffirs also want to benefit from Islamic banking they should first convert to Islam. It is a precondition. On any account Kaffirs cannot benefit from Islamic Banking (h8.24).

          Next, ‘Zakat’ Islamic Charity one the five pillars of Islamic structure. (Other four pillars of Islam are ‘Kalima, Salat, Ramzan fasting and Hajj’). The money so collected in the name of ‘Zakat’ is spent mainly for financing Jihad, and other activities like constructing new mosques; suicidal bombing related expenses, murders through Al-Qaeda (h8.17). The Mosques are also aids to Jihad, because Muslims declare Jihad only from Mosques after Friday Mehrib prayer. These are all a part of Shariah. Now the new mosques are coming up in rapid succession throughout the world starting from New York (Sept-11, 2001 notoriety – New York Mayor Bloomberg and Faisal Abdul Rauf, the Imam behind ‘Cordoba Initiative’ fame in ‘Ground Zero’) and the latest in Ireland, the biggest Mosque ever built in the whole world.

          Some of the other horrors of Islamic banking are: 1. Partnership sharing with the business; 2. confiscation of partnership properties by Islamic banks for trivial / flippant reasons if Islamic banks choose to be so.

          Islamic Banking is being operated as Economic Branch of Jihad-by terrorism. When the whole Banking concept is being analysed thro’ Cost Benefit Analysis (CBA) in Indian Democratic set-up it or in any Democratic set-up for that matter, will create more problems than benefits when we talk of business. In other words costs / (opportunity cost) losses will be more than (opportunity profits) benefits. Only fools will resort to such business through Islamic Banking in India.

 It is like allowing / keeping inside your dresses a lizard / chameleon.  These creatures by their very nature go jumping / loitering in the fences or branches of trees and devour lesser insects if they are left to themselves. If you catch one of them and allow it by inserting / keeping inside in your inside clothes, you know what will be its effect on you.

Why going for all these heartburns? Traditional Banking has made the world what it is today which also made the Saudis also to talk from the position of strength as on date (John Foster Dulles language) with so much of petro-dollars on hand due to their extraordinary greed in the name of Islam. Let these Saudis remember that their petro-dollars were not due to their Islamic Banking alone. Islamic Banking is ‘one way traffic’, like its parent Islam. It can’t but be otherwise. Isn’t it?

Why go wantonly bite a sour / bitter mango in the form of Islamic banking when a best ripe and sweet tasty with appetising aroma filled ‘Alphanso’ mango is readily available in the cool refrigerator in the form of ‘live and let live’ traditional Banking.

At least all those who may have a soft corner for Islamic Banking, just see with your own eyes what happened in Europe. It is apprehended that ‘Euro’ exchange in the nearest future is to be called as Eurobian exchange because they allowed such Islamic Banking (fence loitering lizards or chameleons) in their business systems (dresses).

Let Islamist do their own banking in their own Islamic Lands and not in Democracies. Democracy does not need Islamists in any hues, let alone in Banking.

          Islam always craves for “Caliph-governed Dictatorship”. The word ‘Democracy’ is allergic to Islamic psyche. This the reason why they incite violence, raid, plunder, torture, assassinate, and engage in genocides; rape to quench their lust and visualise any part of any women’s body are meant to be used for only for sex and fit to be enveloped in a black tent uniform covering the entire body (Hijab, Nijab etc.,); and irritate to the maximum the democratic world to test their patience and if are paid-back in their own  coin out of reaction or necessity, there are always a hue and cry by the Muslims as being victimised for the past 1434 years again and again. But intermittent fights may one day becomes unbearable and culminate into a World War Three (WW III) if allowed to intensify. That is what Islamists want.

Islam will be a dead zombie without a raid/fight/war and misogyny. These two types of violence feed them for their very existence. If they succeed in bringing in, a World War III, we do know what may happen. (I am prone to use George Scott’s dialogue on Nazis in the film role as General Paton, but not using them here now).

Under the leadership of Americans so far up to the last WW II, Democratic values have always won. But under the present circumstances and the experience gathered so far regarding American leadership under President of US Barrak Hussain Obama, I don’t know……? What a flourishing height of American Democracy had been so far from the founding fathers times but ……! What will happen to “Life Liberty and pursuit of happiness” if US under the present leadership, going to lead non-Muslim world! I can only say that I shudder to think…….

The time before Muhammad desecrated the Ka’ba temple; there were 360 daily worshipped shrines in a circle as depiction of miniature of Universe in 360⁰ (Geography). When Ka’ba fell to Muhammad, people were really perturbed

Here I am borrowing words from Shakespeare in ‘Julius Caesar’ thro’ the words of Mark Antony on Caesar’s funeral,

“What a fall was there my countrymen,

Then I and you and all of us fell down

whilst bloody treason flourished over us,

O! now you weep, and I perceive

you feel the dint of pity.”

There are two sets of Quranic verses:

1. Mecca Ayats;

Mecca verses were from beginning of Muhammad’s days as Islamic preacher, thanks to Khadhijah, his narcissist wife who said that he became a ‘Prophet’ of Allah. This in fact was done just to pacify Muhammad for the time being at his critical initial frights when he came home running from fungus infested Hira cave wrongly interpreting as if being troubled by evil ghosts and demons. After Khadhijah stated so, he started behaving as a Prophet because it suited him well at that time.

2. Medina Ayats.

In those days of Mecca, there used to be a trade-cum-exhibition festival at ‘Okaz’ festival, where even the Christian /Jewish preachers used to preach them from a podium and enrapture the audience with the stories and parables from their Holy books.  Muhammad was very much impressed with the respect these holy preachers used to get from the people and he wanted such respects shown to him as an Islamic preacher. Though Muhammad knew that as a preacher he had no capacity to impress people with his preaching as he was totally illiterate (Quran: 7:157 & 7:158). Without understanding the relevance or real meaning of contents of those holy books, he as a copy-cat uttered in his own ingenious style the teaching from Biblical and Jewish books. This made the Meccan people to laugh at him for his incapacity to impress the people with his preaching and completely discarded him as a religious preacher as he had nothing to say new on spiritual concepts to attract them to Islam or elevate them to highest of spirituality. But he had never failed to pronounce his parrot-like words of ‘he was the Prophet of Allah’. The above is so stated in Sirat of Ibn Ishaq – in page 195.

          It is said by the learned scholars / elders that wherever there is all-round education, there cannot be fights in between them / the people of different religions who practise them diligently.

Now coming back to Islamic reality, it is clearly echoed by a Pakistani-Economics writer Dr. Farrukh Saleem in 2005 and had clearly proved that ‘Islam has been a curse to everyone and Muslims are its primary victim. His complete data to prove these points are given in Chapter 8, of ‘UMM’ under the title of “Islam and Muslims’ Backwardness”.

In Muhammad’s Mecca days, he could not make people to think in terms of spirituality like Buddhists, Christians, Hindus and Jews did by their honest spiritual preaching, but Muhammad repeated as a parrot as ‘he is the Prophet of Allah’. All he could thus get 130 to 150 disciples in 13 years of assumption of office of ‘Prophet of Allah’ appointed by himself! But all Muhammad’s early disciples were anti-social elements and blood thirsty ex-slaves and misguided violent youths against their own parents.

To eulogise these Meccan verses i.e., copy-cat Islamic preaching, the present day so-called secularists, sickular media, apologists and useful idiots and all Muslim writers of today diligently pick up these copy-cat verses of Mecca ONLY by frequently echoing eloquently without ever picking up Medina verses which he actually practised till Muhammad died.   

Since there was no future for Islam in Mecca he sent the people to Jewish “Yathrib” for livelihood. The year he landed in Yathrib is also reckoned as Hijra by Muslims. But Muhammad frequently cried hoarse through Quran it was Meccans had driven him and his disciples from Mecca. It is thus Muhammad who had taught the Muslims to blame the others for all their foibles and this practice is being followed to this day diligently by later day Muslims.

Now he had his folk of anti-social elements as disciples and they were to be employed or else these few disciples would go back to Mecca for their livelihood leaving Muhammad in lurch, he feared. By his hook and crook ideas, and employing ‘Divide and rule’ policy he was able to cheat the Jews and usurp ‘Yathrib’ belonging to Jews. Jews in those days were timid because they had no experience as raid and ambush / war because everybody was living peacefully there before Mohammad landed. But they were good at smithy works and manufacturing utilities. Initially Jews, by their very nature gave the immigrants food, shelter and livelihood as employees. Muhammad was also aided by Ansaris in those days in the initial stage of aggression. Muhammad was so disparaged and ungrateful to Jews only because they refused oblige Muhammad by embracing Islam in spite of devising suitable Quran verses initially for the purpose. Muhammad and Muslims repaid this by biting the very hands which fed them. Then as a mark of audacity, he rechristened ‘Yathrib’ as Midunat-ul-Nabi later came to be called ‘Medina’.  But not now…………….

Now one “Entebbe” airport incident (very old 1977) can show to the world what Jewish precision efficiency is to the Muslim world.

 (   www.youtube.com/watch?v=LNdsa7GfM04    )

Muhammad advocated – ambush, kill, maim people, marry any girl at the age of nine, and reserve a girl-child in the crawling stage for ultimate marriage (which in fact Muhammad actually did) ; kill even the parents who oppose Islam, keep the women in the back cloak as Hijab / Nijab forever, never allow adoption of any children by the child-less, and rape any women as booties during raid”-(Sahih al-Bukhari – Vol. 5, Book 59, No. 459;Bukhari: Vol. 7, Book 62, No.137). There are allusions as evidences for all these above despicable crimes.

It was only in Yathrib / Medina he realised that violence was going to pay more than he expected and so it became very indispensible for the spread of Islam and the later Muslims followed his methods as they were used to in all other matters. The caliphites followed this method to wreak vengeance on non-Muslims and the Mullahs found out this method had to be made as Islamic ‘Tradition’ for future of Islam as legacy. So they created innumerable ‘Hadiths’ after 200 years of Muhammad’s death, that is after two / three generations after Muhammad’s death — though heresy and supposed to be from people who had heard him say so when Muhammad was alive. Even for a same incident there are different versions in the various Hadiths or in the same Hadith. With this dubious background material as Traditions and practices of Muhammad as Hadiths, these are also a part of Shariah now. Does it not show the lowest level of civility of thinking by Muslims throughout?

Hadiths and Sirat together are called “Sunna’. So, Quran and Sunna form (Islamic Trilogy) i.e. the whole “shariah”. In the whole shariah (100%) with this dubious background material of Hadiths form 60@, Quran as 14% and Sirat of Ibn Ishaq as 26%.  (Thanks to Bill Warner’s Statistical Research website for the Islamic calculations of % as given above)

I give below two reactions in the formation of Quran verses (thanks to Bill Warner in “Shariah for Non-Muslims” for the two points given here).  

1.   It is not done according to Historical happenings i.e. Mecca verses first and then Medina verses. Anyone can see for themselves there are a lot of cut and paste of Quran verses. First a few Mecca verses and then Medina verses, thus creating wanton confusion throughout for Quran readers.

2.  The beginning chapters of Quran are extraordinarily very long with lots of verses (ayats) and the later chapters are so short and slim.

Even the last few chapters out of 114 chapters there are insignificant one-liners betraying themselves as to their very necessity and existence. (Name-sake Chapters)

          Whatever has been quoted as evidences in this Tamil translation of UMM are downloaded from Orthodox Tamil Islamic websites only and nowhere else! I

          I found many anomalies in Tamil Quran too.

Everyone expects that Tamil translation of Quran might have been from of Arabic Quran as English Quran is. But sadly there are so many commissions and omissions in very many places. I found that in the Tamil translation of Quran, a lot of portions in many verses are conveniently omitted / or not translated at all in many troublesome spots (for Tamil Muslims).

This I was able to find out by comparing English and Tamil version of Quran at the same time.

If English Quran which is based on Arabic Quran, how and why should in Tamil Quran discard some portions of verses or completely swallow Allah’s words so blatantly? Then I remembered ‘Taqquiah’. So it cannot but be otherwise. But I have made it a point to show such anomalies of Tamil Quran translations as and when required for the purpose of this translated book.  

          Even then, it is warned and many were and are sentenced to death for contravening or changing traditional, so sacrosanct rendition as given original Quran. It is taken as serious violation of faith of Islam and so it is called as ‘Blasphemy’ punishable only by death as per Shariah rulings. But Mullahs when translating Arabic Quran into Tamil Quran and they either left such inconvenient verses or completely swallow words or not translating at all, (it seems these commissions and omissions) become Islam approved Holy Deception – “Taqquiah’. Inshallah! Subhanallah!!

Muhammad was also a human, like you and me when he later realised that he had made a mistake in the previous Quran verses and re-rendering fresh Quran verses contrary to what had been already stated it was rechristened as ‘expiation’. There are not just a few expiations (contradictions). You know what I mean to covey!  If Allah is the real author of Quran, can HE as all knowing God, Omnipotent, Omniscient, and omnipresent would he be so contradictory in His utterances and justify them later on? Quran 53: 19-20 (an-Najm) and 53: 21-24. Contradictions never end here. Quran blames for such contradiction to Shaitan who had unnecessarily made Allah to say such wrong Quran to be conveyed thro Gabriel to Allah, thus justifying the new latest edition of Quran verses!  Quran: 22 – 52-53.  I am prone to ask this question here. Is Allah the creator of all does He not know what Shaitan is capable of and seal his mouth permanently not to blabber such nonsense in Quran? Here the next question is: who is the real author of Quran? Is it Allah or Muhammad?

In Islam there is no equality in the treatment of human beings. 1.  There are 73 sects in Islam and they fight with other every moment and the result is bloodshed. 2.  There is no equality between Muslim Male and Muslim female (Muslima). 3. Even between other humans, there are Muslims and non-Muslims, i.e. Kaffir. (Whole world knows about this). 4. A Muslim, so long he is remaining a Muslim is considered as a Brother, but the moment he becomes an apostate (leaves Islam), he automatically becomes an enemy fit to be killed by ‘Halal’ torture.

          Whatever Muhammad wanted to do in the name of Islam, like Jihad, he launched unprovoked attacks and raid on people (innocent village folks) without any arms whatsoever and called them (as if) a big wars. Muhammad had never spent even a paisa (very minuscule part of a cent of US) from his pocket to get rich himself and asked his Disciples to spend freely from their own resources for ‘Jihad’. (Quran: 2:195; 3.383; 8.60; 57:07and 10 & 11; 60: 10& 11); assuring / promising them that Allah would return manifold with many unthinkable awards, in terms of earthly comforts and unthinkable excellent heavenly awards. Muhammad had comforted the Muslims that if they spend from their own pockets for the sake of Allah, Allah becomes the debtor for such Muslims and HE will repay manifold!! Those who never listened to this advice will be thrown into hell and inflicted with endless pain by Allah. This is discussed in detail in the book UMM. Whatever commenced from the illiterate narcissist dictator Muhammad it is being continued to this day for the past 1434 years without the use of brain by Muslims. Thus he conducted a business of Islamic cult politics without investment and whatever that comes on the way was his solid profit.

The same method is being followed by all leftists and dictators of the world but these two anarchists just vanished into thin air today. Islam is the in the line next to vanish from the world. Islam was commenced before over 1400 years ago and was grown not by religious preaching but by politics, nothing but politics only.    Here are such Quran samples: 57:10 & 7:158;

Since the whole world belongs to Allah and as Islamic inheritors, Muslims alone should inherit this earth and it is the duty of all Muslims to get rid of those who have occupied the Allah’s / Islamic land unauthorised so far (Dar-ul-harb) and free them from their clutches by war. The lands when freed and made as Allah’s land belonging to Muslims either by converting the Kaffirs to Islam or kill them mercilessly thus making the whole world as Islamic world (Dar-ul-Islam). Do you still call these Islamic orders to covert or kill the non-Muslims as Islamic religious preaching or political ordinance?

          Non-Muslims will not have anything to do with Muslims for what they do to themselves (Muslims) so long it does not hurt non-Muslims. ‘I don’t care about the fox whether it goes to my left or right, as long as it does not pounce on me’. This is what everybody in the world feels today about Islam.  Another thing, the day Islam stops violence, it will evaporate into thin air. And Islamic violence is motivated by Islamic Trilogy (Quran, Hadiths and Sirat). Having all these in mind Dr. Ali Sina has predicted as way back as 2001, Islam will be non-existent like Communism, Nazism, and Fascism by 2030.

          The Eastern religions when compared to Islam, they can be proud of their religions. Here I do not want to discuss about Christian crusades, inquisitions and their present methods to spread Christianity in India. It is said by T.S. Eliot, one of the greatest modern American writers so states – “Indian philosophers’ subtleties make most of the great European philosophers look like schoolboys”.

Today I am very happy that I translated Dr. Ali Sina’s magnum opus, ‘Understanding Muhammad&Muslims’ into Tamil as ‘முகம்மதுவையும் முஸ்லிம்களையும் அறிவோம்’.

Source:  http://www.faithfreedom.org/?p=2932