As
it goes to the seventh phase of polls, the BJP issued a statement
captioned, "Largest Mass Outreach Campaign in Electoral History of a
Democracy", crediting Narendra Modi for addressing an unprecedented 5827
public rallies, programmes, events, 3D rallies and Chai pe charcha.
|
by Sanjay Singh 30 Apr 20:03 pm IST As it goes to the seventh phase of polls, the BJP issued a statement captioned, "Largest Mass Outreach Campaign in Electoral History of a Democracy", crediting Narendra Modi for addressing an unprecedented 5827 public rallies, programmes, events, 3D rallies and Chai pe charcha. The six page statement is designed to convey the level of energy and stamina that Modi has displayed since he was declared BJP's prime ministerial candidate in September last year. Party spokesman Meenakshi Lekhi enthusiastically claimed, "It would not be an exaggeration to describe the Modi campaign as one of the biggest mass mobilisation exercise seen anywhere in the history of electioneering. The scale and intensity of the campaign becomes even bigger when one understands the large population and geographic spread of India. Yes, in the past political leaders have led marathon campaigns but the scale at which this campaign has been done beats them all by miles". She then cites some statistics, starting from 15th September 2013, when Modi addressed his first rally after being anointed as the BJP's PM candidate till 10th May 2014 when campaigning for the last phase of 2014 Lok Sabha Elections ends. The Gujarat CM has addressed 437 rallies across India from Jammu to Kanyakumari, from Amreli to Arunachal Pradesh. From 15th March to 10th May he has travelled almost 3 lakh kilometres. More than the miles covered and number of rallies addressed, however, the statement is more of a mid-course reaffirmation of Modi's singular leadership. The statement does not mention a single name other than Modi. The message is loud and clear, there can't be a Plan B or Plan C, there is only Plan M. "Can you recall such a wide and diverse outreach programme in India's history? His day began at 5 AM and sometimes went past midnight but Narendra Modi's energy and his dedication only increases," the statement declares. The only-Modi message is also being driven home by his ramped up attacks on regional satraps like Mamta Banerjee, Sharad Pawar, Navin Patnaik, Farooq Abdullah and Jayalalitha, some of whom are potential post poll allies. But it is part of a well thought out strategy on part of Modi's core team. Take Modi's personal tirade against Mamata durig his last two outings in Bengal, which offers a dramatic contrast to his initial overtures when he expressed appreciation for her work in Bengal and lauded her guts. But as the electioneering gained momentum, the BJP started getting feedback that Modi was gaining surprise traction among Bengali middle class and even in rural areas. Second, it became clearer to the BJP leadership that Mamata is not inclined to join the BJP in the post poll scenario due to Muslim vote considerations. Rising support for Modi on the ground is eating into voting blocs of all the parties in contention in Bengal, including Congress, Trinamool and Left. The BJP is now confident of taking over Congress's number three position in the state. "We could not have hoped to be in contention and raise percentage of polling in our favour, if we had not punched holes in Mamata's politics and governance," a BJP leader said. Farooq Abdullah's National Conference is another party which is on BJP's hit list. An angry rebuttal by Modi to Farooq's secularist challenge was addressing not just BJP's core supporters but reaching out to other voting blocs to whom Kashmir remains a key issue. The political nuances of trading of charges and counter charges between Modi and Sharad Pawar is different what is seen in case of Mamata and Farooq Abdullah. There were indeed some friendly overtures between Modi and Pawar. There was also some early talk of whether NCP could be part of the NDA. Even as Shiv Sena openly resisted that move, there was a realisation in the BJP camp that an alliance with NCP in these elections would not yield any harvest, but could instead be counter productive. It was at this stage that Modi started attacking Pawar in his rallies and the NCP chief returned the favour. |
Wo Chahte Hain Jaage Na Koiiiii, Ye Raat Ye Andhakar Chale Har Koi Bhatakta Rahe Yunhi, Aur Desh Yunhi Lachar Chale
NaMo NaMo
Namo Event
Wednesday, 30 April 2014
Elections 2014: How BJP gained from a Modi-centric campaign
सट्टा बाजार, मोदी बनेंगे पीएम, भाजपा को 300+ सीटें मिलेंगी
Vivek Shukla 30 Apr 2014
हालांकि लोकसभा चुनावों के नतीजे आगामी 16 मई के सामने आएंगे, पर सट्टा बाजार ने बीजेपी के पीएम पद के उम्मीदवार नरेंद्र मोदी को देश का अगला पीएम मान लिया है, वहीं उनकी पार्टी बीजेपी को भी 317 सीटें मिलने का अनुमान लगाया जा रहा है। जबकि सट्टा बाजार की मानें तो कांग्रेस 2 अंकों तक ही सिमट जाएगी। यही हाल आम आदमी पार्टी का है। सट्टा बाजार का मानना है कि राजनीति में बदलाव की बयार लेकर आई ‘आप’ लोकसभा चुनावों में 6 से 10 सीटें भी ले आए, तो बड़ी बात होगी। बीजेपी को मिलने वाली राज्यवार सीटों का गणित भी बेहद रोचक है। सट्टेबाजों का मानना है कि बीजेपी शासित राज्यों के साथ-साथ दक्षिण में भी मोदी लहर देखने को मिलेगी।
दैनिक भास्कर में छपी एक खबर के अनुसार, मुंबई और इंदौर के सट्टा बाजार ने पीएम पद की दौड़ में सबसे आगे चल रहे नरेंद्र मोदी के लिए 42 पैसे का भाव तय किया है। सट्टा बाजार मान चुका है कि उनके पीएम बनने में कोई अड़चन नहीं आएगी, वहीं कांग्रेस उपाध्यक्ष राहुल गांधी के लिए 6.5 रुपए का भाव तय किया गया है, यानी वे पीएम कुर्सी से कोसों दूर दिखाई पड़ रहे हैं। बता दें कि जिस उम्मीदवार या पार्टी के जीतने की संभावना ज्यादा होती है, सटोरिए उसके कम भाव तय करते हैं वहीं हारने की संभावना वाले नेताओं या पार्टियों के लिए ज्यादा भाव तय किए जाते हैं।
आम आदमी पार्टी के संयोजक और दिल्ली के पूर्व मुख्यमंत्री अरविंद केजरीवाल पर सट्टा बाजार दांव लगाने को ही तैयार नहीं है। उनके लिए जो 500 रुपए का भाव तय किया गया है जिससे स्पष्ट है कि उनके लिए बड़ा उलटफेर तो दूर अपनी साख बचाने तक का संकट उत्पन्न हो जाएगा। केजरीवाल के लिए दिल्ली भी सदमा लेकर आएगी, जहां उनका व्यापक जनाधार माना जाता है। यहां की 7 सीटों में से 6 सीटें सीधे बीजेपी के खाते में जाना सट्टा बाजार ने तय माना है।
Source: http://www.niticentral.com/hindi/2014/04/30/satta-bazar-moodbjp-to-get-300-seats-218234.html
हालांकि लोकसभा चुनावों के नतीजे आगामी 16 मई के सामने आएंगे, पर सट्टा बाजार ने बीजेपी के पीएम पद के उम्मीदवार नरेंद्र मोदी को देश का अगला पीएम मान लिया है, वहीं उनकी पार्टी बीजेपी को भी 317 सीटें मिलने का अनुमान लगाया जा रहा है। जबकि सट्टा बाजार की मानें तो कांग्रेस 2 अंकों तक ही सिमट जाएगी। यही हाल आम आदमी पार्टी का है। सट्टा बाजार का मानना है कि राजनीति में बदलाव की बयार लेकर आई ‘आप’ लोकसभा चुनावों में 6 से 10 सीटें भी ले आए, तो बड़ी बात होगी। बीजेपी को मिलने वाली राज्यवार सीटों का गणित भी बेहद रोचक है। सट्टेबाजों का मानना है कि बीजेपी शासित राज्यों के साथ-साथ दक्षिण में भी मोदी लहर देखने को मिलेगी।
दैनिक भास्कर में छपी एक खबर के अनुसार, मुंबई और इंदौर के सट्टा बाजार ने पीएम पद की दौड़ में सबसे आगे चल रहे नरेंद्र मोदी के लिए 42 पैसे का भाव तय किया है। सट्टा बाजार मान चुका है कि उनके पीएम बनने में कोई अड़चन नहीं आएगी, वहीं कांग्रेस उपाध्यक्ष राहुल गांधी के लिए 6.5 रुपए का भाव तय किया गया है, यानी वे पीएम कुर्सी से कोसों दूर दिखाई पड़ रहे हैं। बता दें कि जिस उम्मीदवार या पार्टी के जीतने की संभावना ज्यादा होती है, सटोरिए उसके कम भाव तय करते हैं वहीं हारने की संभावना वाले नेताओं या पार्टियों के लिए ज्यादा भाव तय किए जाते हैं।
आम आदमी पार्टी के संयोजक और दिल्ली के पूर्व मुख्यमंत्री अरविंद केजरीवाल पर सट्टा बाजार दांव लगाने को ही तैयार नहीं है। उनके लिए जो 500 रुपए का भाव तय किया गया है जिससे स्पष्ट है कि उनके लिए बड़ा उलटफेर तो दूर अपनी साख बचाने तक का संकट उत्पन्न हो जाएगा। केजरीवाल के लिए दिल्ली भी सदमा लेकर आएगी, जहां उनका व्यापक जनाधार माना जाता है। यहां की 7 सीटों में से 6 सीटें सीधे बीजेपी के खाते में जाना सट्टा बाजार ने तय माना है।
Source: http://www.niticentral.com/hindi/2014/04/30/satta-bazar-moodbjp-to-get-300-seats-218234.html
Tuesday, 29 April 2014
“Fixing” between Congress and AAP candidates in Gujarat: EC files complaint
Ahmedabad, 29 April, 2014
According to Gujarat BJP Legal Cell Convener Shri Parindu Bhagat, Election Commission has filed complaint following disclosure of fixing between the candidates of Congress and Aam Aadmi Party on Amreli Lok Sabha seat. Through a conversation captured in video between Virjibhai and someone apparently on behalf of Aam Aadmi Party’s local candidate Nathalal Sukhadiya, it appears that Virjibhai offered Rs. 51,000 per public meeting to AAP candidate to cut pro-BJP votes.
Election Commission has also filed complainst against Congress leader CJ Chavda for defamation against Narendra Modi. Election Commission has started procedure against Gujarat Congress president Arjun Modhwadia.
According to Gujarat BJP Legal Cell Convener Shri Parindu Bhagat, Election Commission has filed complaint following disclosure of fixing between the candidates of Congress and Aam Aadmi Party on Amreli Lok Sabha seat. Through a conversation captured in video between Virjibhai and someone apparently on behalf of Aam Aadmi Party’s local candidate Nathalal Sukhadiya, it appears that Virjibhai offered Rs. 51,000 per public meeting to AAP candidate to cut pro-BJP votes.
Election Commission has also filed complainst against Congress leader CJ Chavda for defamation against Narendra Modi. Election Commission has started procedure against Gujarat Congress president Arjun Modhwadia.
250 For BJP Is Possible
The strong tailwind suggests a huge BJP sweep, with the party alone winning 250 seats
Omkar Goswami
At
the beginning of the year, in an article for this magazine (BW |
Businessworld issue dated 27 January 2014), I had expressed doubts about
the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) led by Narendra Modi securing 210 Lok
Sabha seats in this national election. I concluded, “as of today, it
isn’t obvious how the BJP on its own can win 210 seats” and argued that
if it won less than 200, Mamata Banerjee, Naveen Patnaik or Jayalalithaa
might end up calling the shots.
As I write this piece on 21 April, elections are, more or less, at the half-way mark. Five phases of polling are over covering 232 Lok Sabha seats, in which larger states such as Haryana, Karnataka, Kerala and Odisha are over with, as is the National Capital Territory of Delhi. Four more rounds of polls remain, covering 311 constituencies, many of which are in blockbuster states such as Uttar Pradesh (UP), Bihar, Andhra Pradesh, Tamil Nadu, Gujarat and West Bengal. The last round of polling is on 12 May, covering 41 residual constituencies in UP, Bihar and West Bengal. The results will be announced on 16 May 2014.
Things can change. But, as of now, I need to admit that I was wrong in January 2014. It seems clear to me that the BJP is set to not only comfortably cross the 210 mark, but also take a realistic shot at around 245 to 250 Lok Sabha seats. Let me suggest why.
It is useful to start with two critical states: UP and Bihar. In the 1999 Lok Sabha elections, the BJP had 51 seats in a united UP, including all five seats in what is today’s Uttarakhand. Disenchantment with the Samajwadi Party is at its peak; barring a few constituencies, the Indian National Congress is a non-entity in the state; and many would agree with me that the polarisation of voters according to religious lines is at least as pronounced in 2014 as it was in 1999. Therefore, much as some may consider the thought outrageous, I wouldn’t be surprised if the BJP won around 50 seats in UP.
On to Bihar. In 2009, the BJP won 12 seats out of 40, and the Nitish Kumar-led Janata Dal (United), or JD(U), clinched 20. The JD(U) is in shambles, and Lalu Prasad Yadav’s Rashtriya Janata Dal will probably cut into a quarter of his seats. Bihar BJP’s Sushil Modi runs a tight ship. And the NaMo wave can help the BJP to claim 20 seats in this elections. Maybe even 25 with some extra luck. So, UP and Bihar could get the BJP 70 to 75 seats in the aggregate.
What about the BJP’s backyard, namely Gujarat, Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh and Jharkhand? Gujarat has 26 seats, of which the BJP should secure 22. In Madhya Pradesh, it should win 24 out of the 29. Even if Sachin Pilot gives a stiff fight, the BJP should get 20 of the 25 seats in Rajasthan. And 9 out of 11 in Chhattisgarh plus 10 out of 14 in Jharkhand. That makes it a sub-total of 85 seats for the BJP.
The total now rises to 155 to 160 seats. Now for a few other states. One should expect the BJP to win 14 of the 28 seats in Karnataka; seven of the 10 seats in Haryana; five of seven seats in Delhi NCT; 20 of the 48 seats in Maharashtra; 10 out of 42 in Andhra Pradesh; and perhaps eight of the 21 seats in Odisha by eliminating the Congress and getting a few Biju Janata Dal seats as well. This sub-total is 64 seats.
Add the three sub-totals and you get 224 seats. With such tailwind, the BJP should also pick up bits and bobs everywhere bar the North-east. I expect it to gain another 26 seats across Uttarakhand, Himachal, Goa, Punjab, some of the Union territories and West Bengal.
This is only the BJP. And it definitely looks like a Modi sarkar.
(This story was published in BW | Businessworld Issue Dated 19-05-2014)
As I write this piece on 21 April, elections are, more or less, at the half-way mark. Five phases of polling are over covering 232 Lok Sabha seats, in which larger states such as Haryana, Karnataka, Kerala and Odisha are over with, as is the National Capital Territory of Delhi. Four more rounds of polls remain, covering 311 constituencies, many of which are in blockbuster states such as Uttar Pradesh (UP), Bihar, Andhra Pradesh, Tamil Nadu, Gujarat and West Bengal. The last round of polling is on 12 May, covering 41 residual constituencies in UP, Bihar and West Bengal. The results will be announced on 16 May 2014.
Things can change. But, as of now, I need to admit that I was wrong in January 2014. It seems clear to me that the BJP is set to not only comfortably cross the 210 mark, but also take a realistic shot at around 245 to 250 Lok Sabha seats. Let me suggest why.
It is useful to start with two critical states: UP and Bihar. In the 1999 Lok Sabha elections, the BJP had 51 seats in a united UP, including all five seats in what is today’s Uttarakhand. Disenchantment with the Samajwadi Party is at its peak; barring a few constituencies, the Indian National Congress is a non-entity in the state; and many would agree with me that the polarisation of voters according to religious lines is at least as pronounced in 2014 as it was in 1999. Therefore, much as some may consider the thought outrageous, I wouldn’t be surprised if the BJP won around 50 seats in UP.
On to Bihar. In 2009, the BJP won 12 seats out of 40, and the Nitish Kumar-led Janata Dal (United), or JD(U), clinched 20. The JD(U) is in shambles, and Lalu Prasad Yadav’s Rashtriya Janata Dal will probably cut into a quarter of his seats. Bihar BJP’s Sushil Modi runs a tight ship. And the NaMo wave can help the BJP to claim 20 seats in this elections. Maybe even 25 with some extra luck. So, UP and Bihar could get the BJP 70 to 75 seats in the aggregate.
What about the BJP’s backyard, namely Gujarat, Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh and Jharkhand? Gujarat has 26 seats, of which the BJP should secure 22. In Madhya Pradesh, it should win 24 out of the 29. Even if Sachin Pilot gives a stiff fight, the BJP should get 20 of the 25 seats in Rajasthan. And 9 out of 11 in Chhattisgarh plus 10 out of 14 in Jharkhand. That makes it a sub-total of 85 seats for the BJP.
The total now rises to 155 to 160 seats. Now for a few other states. One should expect the BJP to win 14 of the 28 seats in Karnataka; seven of the 10 seats in Haryana; five of seven seats in Delhi NCT; 20 of the 48 seats in Maharashtra; 10 out of 42 in Andhra Pradesh; and perhaps eight of the 21 seats in Odisha by eliminating the Congress and getting a few Biju Janata Dal seats as well. This sub-total is 64 seats.
Add the three sub-totals and you get 224 seats. With such tailwind, the BJP should also pick up bits and bobs everywhere bar the North-east. I expect it to gain another 26 seats across Uttarakhand, Himachal, Goa, Punjab, some of the Union territories and West Bengal.
This is only the BJP. And it definitely looks like a Modi sarkar.
(This story was published in BW | Businessworld Issue Dated 19-05-2014)
HOW TO FIGHT A CAMPAIGN - An energetic politician and a riveting orator
Writing on the wall - Ashok V. Desai | |
The general elections have thrust
themselves into our calendars. They led to the emigration of the one
show that really excites Indians, namely the Indian Premier League.
Instead of entertaining their fans, our cricket heroes had to play
before empty stadia in distant places like Dubai and Durban. And all
this hardship for what? For watching politicians abuse one another in
empty fields. Not all of them are as empty as the one where Anna Hazare
failed to turn up. There were conflicting reports on whether it was due
to indigestion or congestion. The congestion was certainly not on
Ramlila Maidan. Mamata Banerjee kept the appointment despite pressing
engagements. In spite of her eloquence, an aspiring listener could have
got a dozen chairs to himself.
But there is
one speaker who has been addressing roughly one crowd a day, in all
nooks and corners of the country; despite chances of bombs being thrown,
there are not many empty seats in his meetings. He is a pretty
uneducated character; but some of his most enthusiastic listeners are in
colleges. He can hardly go beyond a single mugged-up sentence in Telugu
or Malayalam; but his Hindi speeches have drawn erstwhile enemies of
Hindi in thousands. He asks his listeners to hang him if he is guilty of
the Gujarat riots; instead, they stand up and chant, MOA DEE MOA DEE.
He has made the current election the most dramatic in a couple of
decades.
Last
September he spoke in Amroodon Ka Bagh (guava garden) in Jaipur; he
taught his audience the English alphabet: A for Adarsh, B for Bofors, C
for Commonwealth Games, D for Damaad (meaning the son-in-law of Sonia
Gandhi), and so on. As the Prime Minister hoisted the flag on Red Fort
in Delhi on August 15, Modi donned a stippled red turban and hoisted
the flag in Bhuj. He did not dismiss the herded children with a
ten-minute speech; he spoke for 55 minutes. Much of his speech was
addressed to the Prime Minister: he asked how the PM felt about
presiding over so many scandals.
Four days
before that, he spoke in Hyderabad. For the first five minutes he spoke
in Telugu. Then he went on to accuse Congress of disuniting people: the
proof was in the number of states they had divided, including Andhra
Pradesh. The rest of the speech was populist: the message was that
Congress had promised food, education, medical care etc, but not
delivered.
He gave a
talk to chartered accountants of Ahmedabad last June; how would he
relate to these chaps in suits and ties, who work entirely in English?
He told them there was so much black money and money parked abroad; he
asked them who could detect it: chartered accountants, obviously. He
described their own work to them: staring at computers, adding up
figures, looking for errors — how boring! Then he told them about
stone-cutters. When they were asked why they did such hard work, one
said it was to feed his family, another said he knew nothing better;
then one said, I am breaking these stones to build a temple. He said
that he himself had left home to do social service, but fate worked
differently, and he had reached where he was. He told them about an
aborigine, who asked Modi if he was on the way to Sabarmati. Modi told
him: start walking, otherwise it will get too hot. The tribal asked him
not to worry about that, what mattered was whether he was going in the
right direction.
Then he came to his favourite theme. The Delhi sarkar
spends only 30 per cent on development expenditure. Gujarat also spent
such a proportion when Modi came to power; today it spends 65 per cent
on development. This is an argument that might appeal even to a
Congressman chartered accountant. Modi then came to Gujaratis’ favourite
sport. He talked of a poor man who invested a few thousand in shares in
the hope of earning enough to marry off his daughter. His bet was based
on companies’ performance; he could trust the performance figures only
if chartered accountants were competent and honest. He asked the CAs to
keep that common man in mind when they audited accounts.
In June he chose the occasion of the release of a book, Beyond a Billion Ballots,
to question the status of the National Advisory Council. There was a
sixty-year-old planning commission, which brought all state governments
together and coordinated their development. Yet, the Congress government
set up the NAC — it was a second cabinet of the other prime minister.
What was the need for it, and how right was the process of setting it
up? Modi has often attacked the Family, and the attacks seem personal
and unbalanced. But the issue of two centres of power has been a real
one. Modi has an alternative concept of good government: it is one in
which the elected representatives decide the direction, but go no
further. They leave it to the bureaucracy to work out the operational
details and implement it. That is how the British government works, and
how Modi claims he has run the Gujarat government.
He also
talks often of people’s participation, and gives examples of how he has
involved them. After the earthquake in Kutch, the government of Gujarat
asked each village to appoint a school committee, and gave it money and
authority to build a school; it set up a material bank from where the
committees could get building materials. Similarly, when the Narmada dam
brought water to new villages, it set up villagers’ committees to
decide how the water should be distributed. In this context, Modi cites
Gandhi’s concepts of trust and trusteeship: the government should act as
a trustee of the people, and trust the people. And it should change
over from procedural to performance audit. This is the same idea as
Chidambaram’s of an outcome budget. Chidambaram talked about it in one
budget speech and put it to sleep; Modi scores better on performance.
Modi is an
energetic politician and a superb orator; both qualities count in an
election, and have brought him much publicity. But most of the
commentators base their judgment on Modi on the performance of Gujarat.
It is good in some areas, poor in others. But it is futile to look for a
correlation between a chief minister and the economic or social
performance of a state: too many variables determine performance, of
which the identity of the chief minister is one. What I would look for
in a chief minister — or prime minister — is ideas and vigour, fluency
and energy, ability to carry people along and inspire them. Modi has
these things. One can think of other factors that count against him. One
may have doubts about his honesty. One may believe that his performance
in the Gujarat riots was unforgivable. These are perfectly valid
opinions. I would only add three things to these considerations. He is a
riveting speaker; he has achieved a number of things that he set out to
in Gujarat; and he is a collector of good ideas.
Source: http://www.telegraphindia.com/1140429/jsp/opinion/story_18284421.jsp#.U2Aq-1fiiA-
|
अडानी, अंबानी, टाटा, बिड़ला - कांग्रेस बीजेपी और आप
ये सचमुच हास्यास्पद है कि कांग्रेस पार्टी अडानी कंपनी को जमीन देने को महापाप बता रही है. कांग्रेस पार्टी को ऐसे आरोप लगाने का तो हक ही नहीं है. उद्योगपतियों को जो जमीन सस्ते दामों पर मिलती है वह कांग्रेस पार्टी व मनमोहन सिंह की नीतियों की वजह से मिलती है. अडानी को जमीन दिया गया वह SEZ (स्पेशल इकोनोमिक जोन) के कानून के तहत दिया गया. अडानी को सबसे पहले कांग्रेस की सरकार ने जमीन दी थी. कांग्रेस व राहुल गांधी या प्रियंका गांधी ने पिछले 10 सालों में SEZ के कानून को क्यों नहीं बदला. या फिर सोनिया गांधी की नेशनल एडवाईजरी कॉसिल के सदस्यों ने विरोध क्यों नहीं किया? इनमें से ज्यादातर लोग आजकल आम आदमी पार्टी में हैं या समर्थक हैं.
उद्योगपतियों को मुफ्त में जमीन देने के नियम को मनमोहन सिंह के दर्शनशास्त्र में इनसेन्टिव कहा जाता है. आज यह इनसेंटिव सभी विचाधारा व रंग के राजनीतिक दलों की सरकार उद्योगपतियों को दे रही है. बीजेपी हो, कांग्रेस हो, नीतीश हो, मुलायम हो, मायावती हो, ममता हो, पटनायक हो या फिर कोई भी हो.. ये सब इसी काम में लगे हैं. फर्क सिर्फ इतना है कि जब ये विपक्ष में रहते हैं या फिर चुनाव हारने लगते हैं तो क्रोनी कैपिटलिज्म क्रोनी कैपिटलिज्म चिल्लाने लगते हैं.
वैसे समझने वाली बात यह है कि विकास के लिए जमीनों को आवंटित करना वैसे गलत नहीं है. इसमें दो बातों का ध्यान रखना जरूरी है. पहला यह कि जमीन का सदउपयोग इंफ्रास्ट्रकचर के विकास व रोजगार के अवसर प्रदान करने वाले कामों में हो. और दूसरा, उद्योगपतियों को आवंटित जमीन किसानों की उपजाऊ जमीन न हो, किसानो से छीन कर न दी जाए. वनवासियों के अधिकारों का हनन न हो. इसका ख्याल रखना चाहिए. अडानी के मामले में जो जमीन दी गई उसपर गुजरात का पहला और देश का सबसे बेहतरीन बंदरगाह बना है. अडानी और मोदी के रिश्तों को स्थापित करने के लिए कांग्रेस और आम आदमी पार्टी ने गलत विषय को चुना है.
वैसे टीवी पर इस विषय पर प्रशांत भूषण को बोलते हुए सुना तो आश्चर्य हुआ. इन्हें तो अपने हिमाचल प्रदेश की जमीन के बारे में बताना चाहिए. ये न तो उद्योगपति हैं और न ही इन्होंने कोई कंपनी खोलने का ऐलान किया था फिर हिमालचल प्रदेश की जमीन का लैंडयूज क्यों बदला? रही बात आम आदमी पार्टी की तो आज आम आदमी पार्टी (AAP) के सदस्य मकसूद उल हसन काजमी ने केजरीवाल पर कुछ उद्योगपतियों के बीच मिलीभगत का आरोप भी लगाया. उन्होंने कहा कि अरविंद केजरीवाल अपने भाषणों में सिर्फ दो ही उद्योग घरानों का जिक्र क्यों करते हैं? यह पूछा है कि केजरीवाल हमेशा अंबानी पर हमले करते हैं, लेकिन रतन टाटा की तारीफ क्यों करते हैं? उन्होंने ये भी पर्दाफाश किया है कि 'मैं अच्छी तरह जानता हूं कि AAP नेता प्रशांत भूषण को सारी सूचनाएं और दस्तावेज देश का एक प्रभुत्वशाली औद्योगिक परिवार उपलब्ध करवाता है. प्रशांत भूषण अरविंद केजरीवाल का उपयोग कर औद्योगिक रंजिश चुकाने में एक औद्योगिक घराने का साथ दे रहे हैं.'
केजरीवाल जी को बताना चाहिए कि जब आपके ही सदस्य यह आरोप लगाते हैं तो आप किस मुंह से क्रोनी कैपिटलिज्म की बात करते हो? आपको काजमी साहब के सवालों का जवाब देना चाहिए.. और कहना चाहिए कि मैं.. केजरीवाल.. टाटा का दलाल नहीं हूं !!!! वर्ना हम तो वही सच मान लेंगे जो काजमी साहब कह रहे हैं.
-Dr. Manish Kumar, Editor Chauthi Duniya
Were AAP supporters drinking beer at Varanasi ghat?
IndiaToday.in
New Delhi, April 29, 2014 | UPDATED 14:33 IST
While AAP leader Arvind Kejriwal
said BJP men beat up two of his supporters at a ghat in Varanasi on
Monday, an alterative account is doing the rounds on Twitter.
According to tweets by journalist Hashmi Shams Tabreed (@hstabreed), it seems the fight, in which two AAP volunteers wee injured, began after they were seen "drinking beer on Assi Ghat and urinating into the Ganga".
"Word is that AAP folks were engaged in a fight yesterday with people who objected to their drinking beer at Assi ghat & Urinating in Ganga.
"Yesterday's scuffle is hurting AAP more. With AAP campaign entirely driven by outsiders, they don't realize Ganga is an emotional issue here.
"I've
talked to a lot of people today, autodrivers, shopkeepers, govt.
servants and most sounded pretty upset with AAP disrespecting ganga,"
Tabreed said in a series of tweets.
This claim is diametrically opposite to the injured AAP supporters' version, who said they were attacked without provocation while they were at a shop to drink water.
"We were returning from campaigning and we had stopped at a shop to drink water. Generally on seeing AAP caps, people came to talks to us. One of the group there was of the BJP and it began shouting 'Modi, Modi'. When they saw we could be influencing people, they asked us to go. Then one of them came and began hitting us," said Nandan Mishra, one of the two injured AAP supporters.
Ankit Lal, who too was injured, said: "It seemed they were from the BJP. They were wearing BJP caps. It all began with an argument. They said you are absconders; you have come to defend an absconder. We asked them to sit down and discuss. They regrouped and came back and four-five of them manhandled us. Nandan was hit on the nose and I was hit on the head."
Reacting to the attack, Kejriwal, who is contesting from the Varanasi Lok Sabha seat against the BJP's prime ministerial candidate Narendra Modi, blamed the BJP of hatching a conspiracy to spread fear and keep AAP supporters away on election day.
"People are scared that they would be attacked on voting day," he said at a press conference.
He also demanded deployment of central forces on polling day in the constituency on May 12.
He went on to claim that attack on the AAP supporters was orchestrated by the BJP. "Earlier, only I was being attacked. But now even common people are being attacked," he said.
A vast majority of university and college students from Delhi are in Varanasi, campaigning for Kejriwal.
Source: http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/hashmi-shams-tabreed-tweets-aap-workers-drinking-beer-aap-supporters-urinating-in-ganga-varanasi/1/358156.html
According to tweets by journalist Hashmi Shams Tabreed (@hstabreed), it seems the fight, in which two AAP volunteers wee injured, began after they were seen "drinking beer on Assi Ghat and urinating into the Ganga".
"Word is that AAP folks were engaged in a fight yesterday with people who objected to their drinking beer at Assi ghat & Urinating in Ganga.
"Yesterday's scuffle is hurting AAP more. With AAP campaign entirely driven by outsiders, they don't realize Ganga is an emotional issue here.
This claim is diametrically opposite to the injured AAP supporters' version, who said they were attacked without provocation while they were at a shop to drink water.
"We were returning from campaigning and we had stopped at a shop to drink water. Generally on seeing AAP caps, people came to talks to us. One of the group there was of the BJP and it began shouting 'Modi, Modi'. When they saw we could be influencing people, they asked us to go. Then one of them came and began hitting us," said Nandan Mishra, one of the two injured AAP supporters.
Ankit Lal, who too was injured, said: "It seemed they were from the BJP. They were wearing BJP caps. It all began with an argument. They said you are absconders; you have come to defend an absconder. We asked them to sit down and discuss. They regrouped and came back and four-five of them manhandled us. Nandan was hit on the nose and I was hit on the head."
Reacting to the attack, Kejriwal, who is contesting from the Varanasi Lok Sabha seat against the BJP's prime ministerial candidate Narendra Modi, blamed the BJP of hatching a conspiracy to spread fear and keep AAP supporters away on election day.
"People are scared that they would be attacked on voting day," he said at a press conference.
He also demanded deployment of central forces on polling day in the constituency on May 12.
Word is that AAP folks were engaged in a fight yesterday with people who objected to their drinking beer at Assi ghat & Urinating in Ganga
— Hashmi Shams Tabreed (@hstabreed) April 29, 2014
He went on to claim that attack on the AAP supporters was orchestrated by the BJP. "Earlier, only I was being attacked. But now even common people are being attacked," he said.
A vast majority of university and college students from Delhi are in Varanasi, campaigning for Kejriwal.
Source: http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/hashmi-shams-tabreed-tweets-aap-workers-drinking-beer-aap-supporters-urinating-in-ganga-varanasi/1/358156.html
AAP member Ashwini Upadhyaya resigns with 2400 others
Press Trust of India | Lucknow Apr 28, 2014
Last Updated at 07:54 PM IST
AAP's national
council member Ashwini Upadhyaya, who was expelled for his "anti-party
activities", today left the party with 2,400 other workers.
Talking to reporters here, Upadhyaya alleged that the ideology, with
which AAP was formed, has lost somewhere and the common man was feeling
cheated.
He said due to this 2,400 workers, including convenors of eight wards
and 40 local incharges, have resigned from the party.
Upadhayay questioned AAP national convenor Arvind Kejriwal "why he
elected un
AAP's
national council member Ashwini Upadhyaya, who was expelled for his
"anti-party activities", today left the party with 2,400 other workers.
Talking to reporters here, Upadhyaya alleged that the ideology, with which AAP was formed, has lost somewhere and the common man was feeling cheated.
He said due to this 2,400 workers, including convenors of eight wards and 40 local incharges, have resigned from the party.
Upadhayay questioned AAP national convenor Arvind Kejriwal "why he elected unconstitutional way for Jan Lokpal bill and why Delhi Lokayukta was not made stronger?"
He said, "Kejriwal resigned from the post of Delhi Chief Minister without referendum."
"AAP fielded 455 candidates in tacit understanding with Congress to divide votes," he said.
He alleged that "Sisodia's Kabir Foundation was registered in 2007, then how he managed to get Rs 44 lakh in 2005 and 32 lakh in 2006 from Ford Foundation."
Upadhyaya also asked why AAP made Yudhveer Singh, who gave clean chit to Robert Vadra in land deal, its candidate from Hisar Lok Sabha seat.
Source: http://wap.business-standard.com/article/pti-stories/aap-member-ashwini-upadhyaya-resigns-with-2400-others-114042800975_1.html
Talking to reporters here, Upadhyaya alleged that the ideology, with which AAP was formed, has lost somewhere and the common man was feeling cheated.
He said due to this 2,400 workers, including convenors of eight wards and 40 local incharges, have resigned from the party.
Upadhayay questioned AAP national convenor Arvind Kejriwal "why he elected unconstitutional way for Jan Lokpal bill and why Delhi Lokayukta was not made stronger?"
He said, "Kejriwal resigned from the post of Delhi Chief Minister without referendum."
"AAP fielded 455 candidates in tacit understanding with Congress to divide votes," he said.
He alleged that "Sisodia's Kabir Foundation was registered in 2007, then how he managed to get Rs 44 lakh in 2005 and 32 lakh in 2006 from Ford Foundation."
Upadhyaya also asked why AAP made Yudhveer Singh, who gave clean chit to Robert Vadra in land deal, its candidate from Hisar Lok Sabha seat.
Source: http://wap.business-standard.com/article/pti-stories/aap-member-ashwini-upadhyaya-resigns-with-2400-others-114042800975_1.html
'दूसरे घर' आ रहे मोदी, घर वाले चहके
शिमला, [मनजीत नेगी]। संघ प्रचारक, प्रदेश पार्टी प्रभारी के बाद स्टार प्रचारक के तौर पर आज हिमाचल आ रहे नरेंद्र मोदी हिमाचल के लिए नया चेहरा नहीं हैं। प्रदेश में मतदान केंद्र तक जाकर भाजपा को मजबूती देकर पहली बार पार्टी की स्थायी सरकार बनाने में उनका अहम योगदान रहा है। पार्टी के कई नेता उनके आने से गदगद हैं। 1993-94 से लेकर वर्ष 2000 तक वह प्रदेश भाजपा प्रभारी रहे हैं। प्रभारी भी ऐसे कि हर विधानसभा क्षेत्र के दूरदराज तक पैदल गए। भाजपा के तब के कार्यकर्ताओं को वह अब भी नाम लेकर पुकारते हैं। मोदी का मानना था, 'कार्यकर्ता तभी आपको मानेंगे जब आप अच्छा काम करके दिखाएंगे। 'रोल मॉडल' बनिए तो तो आपका सम्मान होगा।'
उनके कार्यकाल में महामंत्री रहे प्रवीण शर्मा बताते हैं कि नरेंद्र मोदी के प्रयत्नों से हिमाचल में पहली बार वर्ष 1998 में भाजपा की स्थायी सरकार बन पाई। पहली बार पांच साल की सरकार बनी थी। हालांकि कई बाधाएं थी। वह कहते थे कि यदि वर्ष 1998 में भी भाजपा की सरकार तीसरी बार नहीं चली तो जनता को पार्टी पर से विश्वास उठ जाएगा। संदेश जाएगा कि भाजपा को सरकार चलाना नहीं आता। इससे पहले शांता कुमार के नेतृत्व में भाजपा की सरकारें महज दो से अढ़ाई साल ही दो मर्तबा चली थी। मोदी के साथ पूर्व बागवानी मंत्री स्वर्गीय कुंज लाल, रूप सिंह, राकेश पठानिया, रमेश धवाला, आइडी धीमान, प्रेम कुमार धूमल, जेपी नड्डा, सुरेश चंदेल ने बतौर कार्यकर्ता काम किया है।
उनका दूसरा घर हिमाचल
'नरेंद्र मोदी का हिमाचल से विशेष लगाव रहा है। वह यहां की हर समस्या से वाकिफ हैं। प्रभारी रहते प्रदेश का चप्पा-चप्पा घूमा। हिमाचल को अपना दूसरा घर मानते हुए प्रदेश के विकास की चर्चा पार्टी के वरिष्ठ नेताओं से करते रहते हैं।' -गणेश दत्त, प्रवक्ता भाजपा
'नरेंद्र मोदी बहुत अनुशासित व्यक्तित्व के मालिक हैं। पार्टी के लिए वह दिन रात काम करते व योजनाएं बनाते रहे हैं। ऐसी योजनाओं को वह लागू भी करते। ईमानदारी और लग्न हमेशा रही। पार्टी कार्यकत्र्ताओं से भी वह यही अपेक्षा रखते हैं। संगठन के प्रति काम करने का उनका जज्बा अविस्मरणीय है। प्रधानमंत्री की कुर्सी पर काबिज होने के साथ प्रदेश में विकास के नए आयाम स्थापित होंगे। -प्रेम कुमार धूमल, पूर्व मुख्यमंत्री
मोदी का योगदान अव्वल 'सपने में भी नहीं सोचा जा सकता था कि 1998 में भाजपा सरकार बनाएगी। पार्टी के बीच खींचतान थी, धवाला कांड भी ताजा था। हिमाचल विकास कांग्रेस के नेता व केंद्रीय मंत्री रहे पंडित सुखराम के साथ मिलकर तब भाजपा की पहली बार प्रदेश में स्थायी सरकार बनी थी। यह नरेंद्र मोदी के संगठन बल का ही नतीजा है कि भाजपा का जनाधार और कुनबा लगातार बढ़े। उनके उत्साह और परिश्रम का ही नतीजा रहा है कि आज पार्टी ने प्रधानमंत्री कुर्सी के लिए घोषित किया है।' -सतपाल सत्ती, भाजपा प्रदेशाध्यक्ष
हिमाचल में आज से शुरू होगा रैलियों का रेला
हिमाचल में नरेंद्र मोदी की आज होने वाली रैलियों के बाद स्टार वार का दौर शुरू हो रहा है। कांग्रेस के बडे़ नेता भी प्रचार भुनाने हिमाचल आ रहे हैं तो भाजपा के स्टार प्रचारकों का दौर शुरू हो गया है। भाजपा के प्रधानमंत्री पद के घोषित प्रत्याशी नरेंद्र मोदी की आज होने वाली रैलियों के बाद हिमाचल में राष्ट्रीय अध्यक्ष राजनाथ सिंह प्रत्याशियों के प्रचार के लिए प्रदेश दौरे पर आ रहे हैं। चार मई को जिला किन्नौर के जिला मुख्यालय रिकांगपियो और नाहन में वह प्रचार रैलियां करेंगे। राजनाथ सिंह यहां होने वाली रैलियों के जरिये मंडी और शिमला संसदीय सीट के प्रत्याशी रामस्वरूप और वीरेंद्र कश्यप के लिए वोट की अपील करेंगे।
दूसरी ओर इसी दिन दूसरी और बिलासपुर और बड़सर में हेमामालिनी प्रचार के लिए पहुंच रही हैं। हालांकि भाजपा की तेजतर्रार नेत्री सुषमा स्वराज का दौरा हिमाचल के लिए रद हो गया है। दो दिन का प्रचार के लिए समय सुषमा स्वराज के लिए मिला था। खेती के कामों में व्यस्तता के चलते उनके दौरे के लिए हिमाचल भाजपा के पदाधिकारियों ने इन्कार कर दिया है। राज्य के निचले क्षेत्रों में गर्मी होने के चलते दो दिन के दौरे को रद कर दिया गया है। भाजपा के पदाधिकारियों का कहना है कि 40 लोगों की स्टार प्रचारकों की जो सूची भाजपा ने लोकसभा चुनाव को देखते हुए भारतीय निर्वाचन आयोग को भेजी है उसमें राष्ट्रीय स्तर के बडे़ नेताओं सहित हेमा मालिनी, नवजोत सिंह सिद्धू जैसी हस्तियों के नाम शामिल हैं।
*****
भाजपा के स्टार प्रचारक हिमाचल आ रहे हैं। नरेंद्र मोदी की रैली के बाद राजनाथ सिंह और हेमामालिनी शीघ्र ही प्रचार को पहुंच रहे हैं। सुषमा स्वराज का दौरा रद हुआ है। इसके अतिरिक्त स्टार प्रचारकों की सूची में और नाम भी शामिल है। कई और नेताओं के दौरे संभावित हैं। -गणेश दत्त, अध्यक्ष राज्य प्रचार समिति भाजपा
- See more at: http://loksabha-elections2014.jagran.com/loksabha-election2014/election-news-narendra-modi-to-address-three-rallies-in-hp-today-EL11273381#sthash.uX7vPZHS.dpuf
मोदी पर अब तक लगा 20,000 करोड़ रु. का सट्टा
Apr 29, 2014 at 10:34am | Updated Apr 29, 2014 at 10:46am
नई दिल्ली।
सट्टा बाजार तो सिर्फ नमो-नमो जप रहा है। नरेंद्र मोदी के प्रधानमंत्री
बनने को लेकर सटोरियों में जबर्दस्त भरोसा है और इस उम्मीद में देशभर में
अब तक करीब 20,000 करोड़ रुपये का सट्टा लग चुका है। सबसे बड़ा सट्टा दिल्ली
और जयपुर में लगा है। इन दोनों शहरों में ही अकेले करीब 10,000 करोड़ रुपये
दांव पर लगे हुए हैं।
बीजेपी
के 240 सीटें जीतने के लिए 1 रुपये पर 40 पैसे का भाव मिल रहा है। वहीं
बीजेपी के 225 सीटें जीतने पर 1 रुपये पर 17 पैसे का भाव मिल रहा है।
बीजेपी के 247-250 सीटें जीतने पर 1 रुपये का भाव चल रहा है। वहीं बीजेपी
के 260 सीटें जीतने पर 2.25 रुपये का भाव मिल रहा है।
सट्टा
बाजार में कांग्रेस के 50 सीटें जीतने पर 16 पैसे का भाव मिल रहा है। वहीं
कांग्रेस के 60 सीटें जीतने पर 42 पैसे का भाव मिल रहा है। कांग्रेस के
65-68 सीटें जीतने पर 1 रुपये का भाव मिल रहा है। कांग्रेस के 80 सीटें
जीतने के अनुमान पर 2.50 रुपये का भाव दिया जा रहा है।
इसके अलावा आम आदमी पार्टी के 3-4 सीटें जीतने पर 1 रुपये का भाव दिया जा रहा है।
प्रधानमंत्री
के तौर पर नरेंद्र मोदी को 20 पैसे का भाव, राहुल गांधी पर 8 रुपये का भाव
और मनमोहन सिंह पर 10 रुपये का भाव मिल रहा है।
सट्टा
बाजार में बीजेपी को गुजरात में 22 सीटें, राजस्थान में 23 सीटें, दिल्ली
में 6 सीटें, मध्य प्रदेश को 26 सीटें, आंध्र प्रदेश को 3 सीटें, तमिलनाडु
में 4 सीटें, ओडिशा में 4 सीटें वहीं कर्नाटक में 18 सीटें मिल रही हैं।
Source:
http://khabar.ibnlive.in.com/news/119779/12/4?utm_medium=twitter&utm_source=twitterfeed
Sunday, 27 April 2014
EVM rigging by Congress agent - GUWAHATI JALUKBARI
EVM rigging by Congress agent - GUWAHATI JALUKBARI
Congress wanted to 'retire' Manmohan Singh, but Rahul Gandhi failed to deliver, says Sanjaya Baru's book
Saturday, 12 April 2014 - 4:59pm IST | Place: New Delhi | Agency: IANS
Rahul Gandhi RNA Research & Archives
Despite being plagued by corruption scandals,
economic slowdown and a perceived effete government, the UPA-II could
not afford to "retire" Manmohan Singh as prime minister as Rahul Gandhi
had repeatedly failed to deliver electoral victories for the Congress
party, says a revealing new book.
During the 2009 elections, many believed the Congress party had
purposefully got Manmohan Singh's face plastered on the party manifesto
and election posters believing the party was headed for defeat and the
blame could be taken by the prime minister, says Sanjaya Baru, former
media adviser to the prime minister, in his book "The Accidental Prime
Minister: The Making and Unmaking of Manmohan Singh" (Penguin), that hit
the stands Friday.
On talks between Manmohan Singh and Pakistan's Pervez Musharraf of a
Kashmir peace formula: Baru says Manmohan Singh wanted Musharraf "to
own and propagate the Kashmir 'peace formula'. He was quite willing to
sell this as a 'Musharraf formula' rather than a Manmohan-Musharraf
formula." Manmohan thought there would be more opposition to it in
Pakistan and Musharraf would have to deal with political parties,
religious groups and the army. Singh thought in India there would be "a
wider constituency of support", including from his party. He though the
only real opposition would come from the BJP.
But he underestimated the likely resistance from within his own
party. Both Pranab Mukherjee and AK Antony, as successive defence
ministers in UPA-1, "were reportedly not enthusiastic about a deal on
Siachen, though Sonia had blessed the peace formula". The armed forces
were "ambivalent" with retired generals favouring a deal to end the
agony of the troops fighting on the glacier but serving generals not
willing to trust Pakistan on a deal.
On the Congress' win in 2009 general elections: Few in the Congress
had expected the UPA to win. Before the election verdict, "many believed
that Dr Singh's face had been printed on the cover of the manifesto and
on election posters so that the expected defeat in that election could
be explained away as his defeat and Rahul Gandhi, whose picture was not
printed on the party manifesto or posters, could then claim leadership
as the agent of change. "
Baru quotes a senior political journalist as saying that Rahul was
looking forward to "a tenure as the leader of the Opposition so as to
burnish his own political credentials, differentiating himself, perhaps
even distancing himself, from Dr Singh's legacy. Few expected the
Congress to return to power until almost the very end of the campaign.
They all underestimated Dr Singh's popularity and the lacklustre image
of the BJP's prime ministerial candidate, L.K. Advani, among his own
partymen. "
On why the Congress could not "retire" Manmohan Singh in UPA-II, Baru
writes that plagued by corruption controversies, the economic slowdown
and persistent inflation, the government's popularity declined. The
Congress party "began to switch gears and focus on succession, hoping
Rahul Gandhi would rise to the occasion and take charge. Planted stories
began to appear in the media about Dr Singh's imminent retirement.
However, Rahul's repeated inability to deliver results for the party in a
series of state elections meant that Dr Singh could not be 'retired'
and created a vacuum at the top."
Rahul Gandhi's public outburst last September saying the ordinance
to allow tainted lawmakers to continue should be "torn up and thrown
away", was "probably to bolster his image". "Rahul chose defiance to
authority as his strategy for political relevance," he writes.
On Manmohan Singh's relationship with Sharad Pawar: "With Pawar,
there was a special relationship. Dr Singh often recalled how Pawar
always lent support to him whenever his policies came under attack from
within the Congress party. He regarded Pawar as an 'ally' against his
critics in the Cabinet, like Arjun Singh, AK Antony and Vayalar Ravi."
On Sonia and Manmohan ties. The two did not have much contact
besides their regular meetings. When the core group met at 7, RCR, Sonia
would arrive first and have an exclusive chat with Manmohan. "That was
when the two spoke to each other in private". Singh rarely spoke in the
core-group meetings. "He would hear what others had to say and take his
decisions after having another word with Sonia." There was also very
little social contact between the families of the two leaders. However,
"once in a while Sonia would call on Dr Singh to discuss family
matters...There were, after all, few family elders available to give her
advice on things that may have bothered her in her personal life."
Baru writes that "on at least one occasion she came to see Dr Singh
to discuss her concerns about Rahul's personal plans. Following that
conversation, Dr Singh invited Rahul for lunch and the two spent time
together."
"In private, Sonia often addressed Dr Singh as Manmohan, which,
given her Western background, suggested she felt closer and more
familial in her relationship with him than with other senior leaders of
his generation. Dr Singh, for his part, always referred to her as
Soniaji or Mrs Gandhi and treated her with old-fashioned courtesy."
Source: http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report-congress-wanted-to-retire-manmohan-singh-but-rahul-gandhi-failed-to-deliver-says-sanjaya-baru-s-book-1977694
During the 2009 elections, many believed the Congress party had purposefully got Manmohan Singh's face plastered on the party manifesto and election posters believing the party was headed for defeat and the blame could be taken by the prime minister, says Sanjaya Baru, former media adviser to the prime minister, in his book "The Accidental Prime Minister: The Making and Unmaking of Manmohan Singh" (Penguin), that hit the stands Friday.
On talks between Manmohan Singh and Pakistan's Pervez Musharraf of a Kashmir peace formula: Baru says Manmohan Singh wanted Musharraf "to own and propagate the Kashmir 'peace formula'. He was quite willing to sell this as a 'Musharraf formula' rather than a Manmohan-Musharraf formula." Manmohan thought there would be more opposition to it in Pakistan and Musharraf would have to deal with political parties, religious groups and the army. Singh thought in India there would be "a wider constituency of support", including from his party. He though the only real opposition would come from the BJP.
But he underestimated the likely resistance from within his own party. Both Pranab Mukherjee and AK Antony, as successive defence ministers in UPA-1, "were reportedly not enthusiastic about a deal on Siachen, though Sonia had blessed the peace formula". The armed forces were "ambivalent" with retired generals favouring a deal to end the agony of the troops fighting on the glacier but serving generals not willing to trust Pakistan on a deal.
On the Congress' win in 2009 general elections: Few in the Congress had expected the UPA to win. Before the election verdict, "many believed that Dr Singh's face had been printed on the cover of the manifesto and on election posters so that the expected defeat in that election could be explained away as his defeat and Rahul Gandhi, whose picture was not printed on the party manifesto or posters, could then claim leadership as the agent of change. "
Baru quotes a senior political journalist as saying that Rahul was looking forward to "a tenure as the leader of the Opposition so as to burnish his own political credentials, differentiating himself, perhaps even distancing himself, from Dr Singh's legacy. Few expected the Congress to return to power until almost the very end of the campaign. They all underestimated Dr Singh's popularity and the lacklustre image of the BJP's prime ministerial candidate, L.K. Advani, among his own partymen. "
On why the Congress could not "retire" Manmohan Singh in UPA-II, Baru writes that plagued by corruption controversies, the economic slowdown and persistent inflation, the government's popularity declined. The Congress party "began to switch gears and focus on succession, hoping Rahul Gandhi would rise to the occasion and take charge. Planted stories began to appear in the media about Dr Singh's imminent retirement. However, Rahul's repeated inability to deliver results for the party in a series of state elections meant that Dr Singh could not be 'retired' and created a vacuum at the top."
Rahul Gandhi's public outburst last September saying the ordinance to allow tainted lawmakers to continue should be "torn up and thrown away", was "probably to bolster his image". "Rahul chose defiance to authority as his strategy for political relevance," he writes.
On Manmohan Singh's relationship with Sharad Pawar: "With Pawar, there was a special relationship. Dr Singh often recalled how Pawar always lent support to him whenever his policies came under attack from within the Congress party. He regarded Pawar as an 'ally' against his critics in the Cabinet, like Arjun Singh, AK Antony and Vayalar Ravi."
On Sonia and Manmohan ties. The two did not have much contact besides their regular meetings. When the core group met at 7, RCR, Sonia would arrive first and have an exclusive chat with Manmohan. "That was when the two spoke to each other in private". Singh rarely spoke in the core-group meetings. "He would hear what others had to say and take his decisions after having another word with Sonia." There was also very little social contact between the families of the two leaders. However, "once in a while Sonia would call on Dr Singh to discuss family matters...There were, after all, few family elders available to give her advice on things that may have bothered her in her personal life."
Baru writes that "on at least one occasion she came to see Dr Singh to discuss her concerns about Rahul's personal plans. Following that conversation, Dr Singh invited Rahul for lunch and the two spent time together."
"In private, Sonia often addressed Dr Singh as Manmohan, which, given her Western background, suggested she felt closer and more familial in her relationship with him than with other senior leaders of his generation. Dr Singh, for his part, always referred to her as Soniaji or Mrs Gandhi and treated her with old-fashioned courtesy."
Source: http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report-congress-wanted-to-retire-manmohan-singh-but-rahul-gandhi-failed-to-deliver-says-sanjaya-baru-s-book-1977694
After 'Bal Narendra', a 'graphic biography' on Modi now
Last Updated: Sunday, April 13, 2014, 14:33
New Delhi: Books on Narendra Modi seems to be the flavour of the poll
season with another work -- a 'graphic biography' narrating his journey
from birth till becoming the prime ministerial candidate of BJP -- set
to hit bookstores soon.
'Narendra Modi: The Icon of Development' is being published by city-based Prabhat Prakashan. It has a Hindi edition 'Narendra Modi: Bhavishya Ki Asha' and is also being published in Marathi and Gujarati.
Over 10 books in different languages, including English, Hindi and Gujarati, on Modi have been released in the past two months and a few more are slated to hit the market soon.
The 24-page book, priced at Rs 60, carries illustrations of various phases of Modi's life including his childhood, how he helped his father sell tea in trains, how he became an RSS pracharak, his involvement in Ekta Yatra in 1991, his tenure as BJP general secretary and his journey from Gujarat Chief Minister to BJP's Prime Ministerial candidate.
Prabhat Prakashan Director Piyush Kumar says the basic idea behind the graphic novel was to "exploit brand Modi" in this election season.
"We wanted to exploit brand Modi as there has been a huge demand for books about his life. The idea was evolved last December during the Patna book fair and now the Hindi and English versions are ready. We will also have an informal launch in the near future," Kumar told PTI.
"Work on bringing out the Marathi and Gujarati versions is also in progress. Saket Prakashan, Aurangabad and Navbharat, Ahmedabad have got the rights for those. We are also working on an animation CD on his life but it will take some time," he adds.
The concept for the book is written by Kanpur-based writer Zameer and is largely based on Modi's biography written by Kishore Makwana.
The publication house has come up with 4,000 copies each in Hindi and English and will bring the next edition soon.
"We have got an order for 1,000 copies from Wheeler. The book will be available on Flipkart, Amazon and Snapdeal soon apart from the 250 booksellers across the country," Kumar says.
He also says that earlier books on Modi have got good response and there is a plan to bring more before the elections get over.
"Brand Modi is becoming big in publishing business. We have published around 11 books on him recently and they have been received well. Now, we are also bringing a book on tweets from Modi and BJP," he says.
The graphic novel also shows Modi's brave deeds, his work as an RSS
pracharak, hoisting the tricolour in in Srinagar's Lal Chowk in 1992,
his differences with then state BJP president Shankar Singh Vaghela and
taking oath as chief minister of Gujarat.
It concludes with his speech at an election campaign in Delhi after becoming BJP's PM candidate. Earlier, a comic book 'Bal Narendra - Childhood Stories of Narendra Modi' was brought out by Rannade Prakashan and Blue Snail Animation. The comic book tells stories of Modi's bravery.
'Narendra Modi: The Icon of Development' is being published by city-based Prabhat Prakashan. It has a Hindi edition 'Narendra Modi: Bhavishya Ki Asha' and is also being published in Marathi and Gujarati.
Over 10 books in different languages, including English, Hindi and Gujarati, on Modi have been released in the past two months and a few more are slated to hit the market soon.
The 24-page book, priced at Rs 60, carries illustrations of various phases of Modi's life including his childhood, how he helped his father sell tea in trains, how he became an RSS pracharak, his involvement in Ekta Yatra in 1991, his tenure as BJP general secretary and his journey from Gujarat Chief Minister to BJP's Prime Ministerial candidate.
Prabhat Prakashan Director Piyush Kumar says the basic idea behind the graphic novel was to "exploit brand Modi" in this election season.
"We wanted to exploit brand Modi as there has been a huge demand for books about his life. The idea was evolved last December during the Patna book fair and now the Hindi and English versions are ready. We will also have an informal launch in the near future," Kumar told PTI.
"Work on bringing out the Marathi and Gujarati versions is also in progress. Saket Prakashan, Aurangabad and Navbharat, Ahmedabad have got the rights for those. We are also working on an animation CD on his life but it will take some time," he adds.
The concept for the book is written by Kanpur-based writer Zameer and is largely based on Modi's biography written by Kishore Makwana.
The publication house has come up with 4,000 copies each in Hindi and English and will bring the next edition soon.
"We have got an order for 1,000 copies from Wheeler. The book will be available on Flipkart, Amazon and Snapdeal soon apart from the 250 booksellers across the country," Kumar says.
He also says that earlier books on Modi have got good response and there is a plan to bring more before the elections get over.
"Brand Modi is becoming big in publishing business. We have published around 11 books on him recently and they have been received well. Now, we are also bringing a book on tweets from Modi and BJP," he says.
|
It concludes with his speech at an election campaign in Delhi after becoming BJP's PM candidate. Earlier, a comic book 'Bal Narendra - Childhood Stories of Narendra Modi' was brought out by Rannade Prakashan and Blue Snail Animation. The comic book tells stories of Modi's bravery.
PTI
First Published: Sunday, April 13, 2014, 14:33
"If I Weren't A Sanyasin, He Would Have Married Me"
A dapper PM. An alluring godwoman. A bunch of letters
and a still-born child. Outlook unravels a little-known Nehru story...
One day in April 1949, Dr Ezekiel, a lady doctor working in a
hospital near the Cantonment Station in Bangalore, took pity on a
pregnant woman who was thrown out of a hospital because she refused to
divulge her name or address. All that Dr Ezekiel knew about the woman
was that she was from North India and looked affluent, although she had
very little money on her. So taken in was Dr Ezekiel by the woman in her
early 30s that she rented a small house for her in the Benson Town area
for Rs 50, bought her provisions, arranged for a dhobi and took her
twice by taxi to a Roman Catholic hospital in the Civil Station for
examination.
The would-be mother spent a month in Bangalore reading and re-reading from a packet of letters she carried with her at all times, keeping them under her pillow when she slept.
After
one false alarm, she was rushed to the Catholic hospital on May 30,
1949, where she delivered a stillborn child the same night. She stayed
at the hospital for nine days and returned to her rented home to
recuperate for another 10 days before she finally took the flight back
to Delhi on June 19, promising to repay her debts to the Ezekiels which
amounted to Rs 600.
She forgot, however, to carry her precious letters back with her. They were intimate letters written to her by the Prime Minister of India, Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru. She was Shraddha Mata, a young attractive sanyasin whom Nehru appeared to be besotted with.
A retired chief justice of the Punjab and Calcutta high courts, Debi Singh Tewatia, a friend of the sanyasin, revealed to Outlook the full story of the Nehru-Shraddha Mata relationship. This is how it goes:
The Ezekiels never heard from Shraddha Mata again. When even the letter they sent her at the address she had given—c/o Asutosh Lahiri, gshms, New Delhi, was returned unopened, Dr Ezekiel's husband turned to Dr Karamchand Wade, a Hindi scholar and a friend, for help.
Was
there any clue to her whereabouts, Ezekiel wanted to know, in the
packet of letters which she had guarded so jealously but had forgotten
under her pillow when she left?
Wade needed only one glimpse of the first letter, sent from Government House, Lucknow, on March 2, 1948, to recognise the handwriting of Pandit Nehru. The other letters were also from Nehru, addressed to Shraddha, and "of an intimate nature". Wade, an ardent admirer of the prime minister, was alarmed about the consequences to Nehru's reputation.
He paid Ezekiel the Rs 600 that Shraddha had borrowed and kept the letters. Wanting to deliver the letters personally to Nehru, he wrote to Nehru's private secretary A. Vithal Pai, whom he knew. But Pai's reply was not encouraging. Neither he nor the prime minister, Pai wrote, thought Wade should put himself to the trouble and expense of coming to Delhi to deliver the letters. He suggested that Wade send them by registered insured cover to Pai's residence instead. Pai airily dismissed Wade's claims of holding incriminating letters that would damage Nehru's reputation. "It is of course possible that misleading and plausible interpretations might be put on one or two chits that you may have seen," wrote Pai, "but the Prime Minister himself is not worried about improper or malicious use being made of them. I shall however wait to see the letters when you send them to me."
Wade wrote to Pai again, quoting from one of the letters in which Nehru says he may be able to see Shraddha Mata late at night after 10 pm.
But
Pai was unfazed. "No one need put any malicious interpretation on it,"
he wrote. "The importance we attach to your letter is not because of any
interpretation that can be placed in the message that you quote, but on
the fact that what you say shows up the woman in a very bad light."
But the tenacious Wade decided to travel to Delhi and deliver the papers to Nehru in person.Nehru met him and gave him one of the more innocuous letters from the packet as a keepsake. It was for identifying himself in case Wade ever needed to see him again. Nehru also gave him an exclusive phone number where he could get in touch with him and offered him some assignments. But Wade turned down the offer, saying that he had taken the trouble to get hold of the letters and deliver them to him out of a patriotic spirit and regard for the prime minister's reputation.
Shraddha Mata was first introduced to Nehru in 1948 in what could have been a Hindu Mahasabha plot to subvert Nehru's secular plans for India! Hindu Mahasabha chief Shyama Prasad Mookerjee, who first saw Shraddha Mata in Calcutta, mesmerising large assemblies with her lectures on the Vedas, invited her to Delhi. She had an equally impressive debut in Delhi where she addressed several meetings on her vision of a Hindu India.
Aware
of Nehru's susceptibility to attractive young women, Mookerjee tried to
get the prime minister to meet her. At first, Nehru, with his innate
disgust for godmen and godwomen, refused, but Mookerjee recruited a
friend, Jagat Narain Lal, to take her to the prime minister's residence
with him. One look at the shapely woman apparently bowled Nehru over.
The 15-minute private audience he had granted her stretched to an hour
and a half, and many more followed, usually late at night.
By March 1949, Hindu Mahasabha leaders were celebrating the success of their ploy. Outlook's research reveals that the Intelligence Bureau (IB) intercepted and forwarded a letter from the Mahasabha's Ashutosh Lahiri to V.D. Savarkar, to home minister Vallabhbhai Patel. Lahiri was crowing about Shraddha's "active contact" with Nehru. "I believe that higher powers are guiding the destiny of India. Who knows that this new contact, if it effectuates, might lead to quite new developments," he wrote.
On March 4, 1949, Patel forwarded the letter to Nehru, asking him for an explanation. Nehru replied the same day, dismissing the whole affair lightly: "...it is perfectly true that the lady in question has met me several times in Delhi and Lucknow.... (We) usually discussed two subjects—the Hindu Code Bill and the question of language, that is, Hindi. She tried to influence me in regard to these two matters and I tried to influence her the other way.
I don't know what success I've had, but she had none, so far as I am concerned."
Shraddha was more candid. In an interview with Khushwant Singh 15 years after Nehru's death, she said: "At the very first meeting that took place in the house on Aurangzeb Road, we established a rapport which seemed to indicate that we had known each other in our previous lives. I could see Panditji was attracted to me. He was impressed with what I had to say. And I do not deny that he was attracted towards this (pointing to her face and features). I met him many times and for many hours at a stretch. I sensed his growing attachment to me. He asked me many times about my marriage and my husband. I can say that had I been free and not taken the vows of a sanyasin, it would have been me and not any of the other women whose names have been linked with him (Lady Mountbatten, Padmaja Naidu, Mrinalini Sarabhai) that he would have wanted to marry. But it never came to it. I told him quite firmly that I was a sanyasin and that he, as a Brahmin, was expected to honour Hindu traditions." Shraddha, of course, denied that the relationship had ever gone beyond the platonic, but Khushwant was not convinced. "It was quite clear from all that she said that they did have an affair," he told Outlook.
In 1976, Justice Debi Singh Tewatia received a letter from Dr Wade asking for an appointment. They met. Wade, in his 80s then, produced the one letter that Nehru had let him keep.It was an innocuous two lines, but the story that Wade told Tewatia about what seemed to be Nehru's illegitimate child was startling.
The irony of fate was that Tewatia had known Shraddha Mata since 1952, when he and the sanyasin were residing at the same boarding house on 48, Parliament Street in London, and knew about Nehru's relationship with her. "She was an orthodox Hindu and a very good orator," says Tewatia. Her face was rather plain but her voice, Tewatia recalls, was bewitching, especially when she sang Meera's bhajans. The young law student and the sanyasin met frequently and engaged in animated discussions on theological matters on which she was very well informed, devouring books in Hindi and English that lay in piles all over her room.
Tewatia learnt that Shraddha was born in Sultanpur, given in adoption to her paternal aunt, the queen of a small principality near Ayodhya. Married at 14 to a distant cousin, an advocate from Agra, she sought refuge within two weeks of her marriage in Gandhi's ashram. She later fled to the Himalayas, emerging as a full-fledged sanyasin at 26, sought out as a powerful orator and a living goddess. Shraddha did not make a secret of her political connections, especially with Nehru. Tewatia was himself an admirer of Nehru and it was to disabuse him about his idol that Shraddha told him of her intimacy with him. "I was arguing with her about the irrationality of palmistry when she suddenly said, 'You think Panditji is a rationalist? He used to extend his palm for me to read like a child'," he recalls.
Shraddha seemed to know the then vice-president, Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan as well. When she was ready to return to India a couple of years later, she asked Tewatia to call Radhakrishnan. The number she gave him was of a hotel in London, and Radhakrishnan came on the line immediately when he learnt that the call was from Shraddha. It was the vice-president, says Tewatia, who arranged for her flight back home within a week of her calling him.
Tewatia met her again almost a year later in August 1955 in Faridabad, Haryana. Her cottage was fenced in with a barbed wire guarded by several fierce dogs. One of her disciples let him in. They were both travelling to Delhi that afternoon and Shraddha offered him a lift in her new Packard car. The driver was a handsome Frenchman, Tewatia recalls. Her distaste for foreigners seemed to have vanished by then. "She even asked me if I had found a foreign wife for myself and when I reminded her that she was against Indians marrying foreigners, she said: 'Indians are very bad. Foreigners are much better'."
Tewatia's next encounter with the sanyasin was in 1966. "She was staying in Rajasthan House and I went to see her. She was quite changed. She had lost a lot of weight and her views were more progressive. She had become a leftist. She said something about Indira Gandhi I didn't understand then. She told me, 'Woh chudail mere peeche padi hui hai (that witch is after my blood).' Tewatia did not ask her why. Ten years later, when he met Wade, he understood.
Tewatia met Shraddha once again in 1985. He had arrived in Jaipur as one of a baraat party for the wedding of a nephew, and heard the night before his departure to Delhi that Shraddha was living right behind his hotel in an abandoned fort gifted to her by a devotee. She had changed almost beyond recognition, having become diabetic. But she was as friendly and hospitable as on their first meeting in London. It was the last time they met.
Shraddha Mata, quite possibly the mother of India's first prime minister's still-born child, passed away in 1987.
The would-be mother spent a month in Bangalore reading and re-reading from a packet of letters she carried with her at all times, keeping them under her pillow when she slept.
|
She forgot, however, to carry her precious letters back with her. They were intimate letters written to her by the Prime Minister of India, Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru. She was Shraddha Mata, a young attractive sanyasin whom Nehru appeared to be besotted with.
A retired chief justice of the Punjab and Calcutta high courts, Debi Singh Tewatia, a friend of the sanyasin, revealed to Outlook the full story of the Nehru-Shraddha Mata relationship. This is how it goes:
The Ezekiels never heard from Shraddha Mata again. When even the letter they sent her at the address she had given—c/o Asutosh Lahiri, gshms, New Delhi, was returned unopened, Dr Ezekiel's husband turned to Dr Karamchand Wade, a Hindi scholar and a friend, for help.
|
Wade needed only one glimpse of the first letter, sent from Government House, Lucknow, on March 2, 1948, to recognise the handwriting of Pandit Nehru. The other letters were also from Nehru, addressed to Shraddha, and "of an intimate nature". Wade, an ardent admirer of the prime minister, was alarmed about the consequences to Nehru's reputation.
He paid Ezekiel the Rs 600 that Shraddha had borrowed and kept the letters. Wanting to deliver the letters personally to Nehru, he wrote to Nehru's private secretary A. Vithal Pai, whom he knew. But Pai's reply was not encouraging. Neither he nor the prime minister, Pai wrote, thought Wade should put himself to the trouble and expense of coming to Delhi to deliver the letters. He suggested that Wade send them by registered insured cover to Pai's residence instead. Pai airily dismissed Wade's claims of holding incriminating letters that would damage Nehru's reputation. "It is of course possible that misleading and plausible interpretations might be put on one or two chits that you may have seen," wrote Pai, "but the Prime Minister himself is not worried about improper or malicious use being made of them. I shall however wait to see the letters when you send them to me."
Wade wrote to Pai again, quoting from one of the letters in which Nehru says he may be able to see Shraddha Mata late at night after 10 pm.
|
But the tenacious Wade decided to travel to Delhi and deliver the papers to Nehru in person.Nehru met him and gave him one of the more innocuous letters from the packet as a keepsake. It was for identifying himself in case Wade ever needed to see him again. Nehru also gave him an exclusive phone number where he could get in touch with him and offered him some assignments. But Wade turned down the offer, saying that he had taken the trouble to get hold of the letters and deliver them to him out of a patriotic spirit and regard for the prime minister's reputation.
Shraddha Mata was first introduced to Nehru in 1948 in what could have been a Hindu Mahasabha plot to subvert Nehru's secular plans for India! Hindu Mahasabha chief Shyama Prasad Mookerjee, who first saw Shraddha Mata in Calcutta, mesmerising large assemblies with her lectures on the Vedas, invited her to Delhi. She had an equally impressive debut in Delhi where she addressed several meetings on her vision of a Hindu India.
|
By March 1949, Hindu Mahasabha leaders were celebrating the success of their ploy. Outlook's research reveals that the Intelligence Bureau (IB) intercepted and forwarded a letter from the Mahasabha's Ashutosh Lahiri to V.D. Savarkar, to home minister Vallabhbhai Patel. Lahiri was crowing about Shraddha's "active contact" with Nehru. "I believe that higher powers are guiding the destiny of India. Who knows that this new contact, if it effectuates, might lead to quite new developments," he wrote.
On March 4, 1949, Patel forwarded the letter to Nehru, asking him for an explanation. Nehru replied the same day, dismissing the whole affair lightly: "...it is perfectly true that the lady in question has met me several times in Delhi and Lucknow.... (We) usually discussed two subjects—the Hindu Code Bill and the question of language, that is, Hindi. She tried to influence me in regard to these two matters and I tried to influence her the other way.
|
Shraddha was more candid. In an interview with Khushwant Singh 15 years after Nehru's death, she said: "At the very first meeting that took place in the house on Aurangzeb Road, we established a rapport which seemed to indicate that we had known each other in our previous lives. I could see Panditji was attracted to me. He was impressed with what I had to say. And I do not deny that he was attracted towards this (pointing to her face and features). I met him many times and for many hours at a stretch. I sensed his growing attachment to me. He asked me many times about my marriage and my husband. I can say that had I been free and not taken the vows of a sanyasin, it would have been me and not any of the other women whose names have been linked with him (Lady Mountbatten, Padmaja Naidu, Mrinalini Sarabhai) that he would have wanted to marry. But it never came to it. I told him quite firmly that I was a sanyasin and that he, as a Brahmin, was expected to honour Hindu traditions." Shraddha, of course, denied that the relationship had ever gone beyond the platonic, but Khushwant was not convinced. "It was quite clear from all that she said that they did have an affair," he told Outlook.
In 1976, Justice Debi Singh Tewatia received a letter from Dr Wade asking for an appointment. They met. Wade, in his 80s then, produced the one letter that Nehru had let him keep.It was an innocuous two lines, but the story that Wade told Tewatia about what seemed to be Nehru's illegitimate child was startling.
The irony of fate was that Tewatia had known Shraddha Mata since 1952, when he and the sanyasin were residing at the same boarding house on 48, Parliament Street in London, and knew about Nehru's relationship with her. "She was an orthodox Hindu and a very good orator," says Tewatia. Her face was rather plain but her voice, Tewatia recalls, was bewitching, especially when she sang Meera's bhajans. The young law student and the sanyasin met frequently and engaged in animated discussions on theological matters on which she was very well informed, devouring books in Hindi and English that lay in piles all over her room.
Tewatia learnt that Shraddha was born in Sultanpur, given in adoption to her paternal aunt, the queen of a small principality near Ayodhya. Married at 14 to a distant cousin, an advocate from Agra, she sought refuge within two weeks of her marriage in Gandhi's ashram. She later fled to the Himalayas, emerging as a full-fledged sanyasin at 26, sought out as a powerful orator and a living goddess. Shraddha did not make a secret of her political connections, especially with Nehru. Tewatia was himself an admirer of Nehru and it was to disabuse him about his idol that Shraddha told him of her intimacy with him. "I was arguing with her about the irrationality of palmistry when she suddenly said, 'You think Panditji is a rationalist? He used to extend his palm for me to read like a child'," he recalls.
Shraddha seemed to know the then vice-president, Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan as well. When she was ready to return to India a couple of years later, she asked Tewatia to call Radhakrishnan. The number she gave him was of a hotel in London, and Radhakrishnan came on the line immediately when he learnt that the call was from Shraddha. It was the vice-president, says Tewatia, who arranged for her flight back home within a week of her calling him.
Tewatia met her again almost a year later in August 1955 in Faridabad, Haryana. Her cottage was fenced in with a barbed wire guarded by several fierce dogs. One of her disciples let him in. They were both travelling to Delhi that afternoon and Shraddha offered him a lift in her new Packard car. The driver was a handsome Frenchman, Tewatia recalls. Her distaste for foreigners seemed to have vanished by then. "She even asked me if I had found a foreign wife for myself and when I reminded her that she was against Indians marrying foreigners, she said: 'Indians are very bad. Foreigners are much better'."
Tewatia's next encounter with the sanyasin was in 1966. "She was staying in Rajasthan House and I went to see her. She was quite changed. She had lost a lot of weight and her views were more progressive. She had become a leftist. She said something about Indira Gandhi I didn't understand then. She told me, 'Woh chudail mere peeche padi hui hai (that witch is after my blood).' Tewatia did not ask her why. Ten years later, when he met Wade, he understood.
Tewatia met Shraddha once again in 1985. He had arrived in Jaipur as one of a baraat party for the wedding of a nephew, and heard the night before his departure to Delhi that Shraddha was living right behind his hotel in an abandoned fort gifted to her by a devotee. She had changed almost beyond recognition, having become diabetic. But she was as friendly and hospitable as on their first meeting in London. It was the last time they met.
Shraddha Mata, quite possibly the mother of India's first prime minister's still-born child, passed away in 1987.
Source: http://www.outlookindia.com/article.aspx?223036
US secretly created ‘Cuban Twitter’ to stir unrest
AP
|
Apr 3, 2014, 05.36 PM IST
WASHINGTON: In July 2010, Joe McSpedon, a US government official, flew to Barcelona to put the final touches on a secret plan to build a social media project aimed at undermining Cuba's communist government.
McSpedon and his team of high-tech contractors had come in from Costa Rica and Nicaragua, Washington and Denver. Their mission — to launch a messaging network that could reach hundreds of thousands of Cubans. To hide the network from the Cuban government, they would set up a byzantine system of front companies using a Cayman Islands bank account, and recruit unsuspecting executives who would not be told of the company's ties to the US government.
McSpedon didn't work for the CIA. This was a programme paid for and run by the US Agency for International Development, best known for overseeing billions of dollars in US humanitarian aid.
According to documents obtained by Associated Press and multiple interviews with people involved in the project, the plan was to develop a bare-bones "Cuban Twitter,'' using cellphone text messaging to evade Cuba's strict control of information and its stranglehold restrictions over the Internet. In a play on Twitter, it was called ZunZuneo — slang for a Cuban hummingbird's tweet.
Documents show the US government planned to build a subscriber base through "non-controversial content''— news messages on soccer, music, and hurricane updates. Later when the network reached a critical mass of subscribers, perhaps hundreds of thousands, operators would introduce political content aimed at inspiring Cubans to organize "smart mobs'' — mass gatherings called at a moment's notice that might trigger a Cuban Spring, or, as one USAID document put it, "renegotiate the balance of power between the state and society.''
At its peak, the project drew in more than 40,000 Cubans to share news and exchange opinions. But its subscribers were never aware it was created by the US government, or that American contractors were gathering their private data in the hope that it might be used for political purposes.
"There will be absolutely no mention of United States government involvement,'' according to a 2010 memo from Mobile Accord, one of the project's contractors. "This is absolutely crucial for the long-term success of the service and to ensure the success of the mission.''
The programme's legality is unclear — US law requires that any covert action by a federal agency must have a presidential authorization. Officials at USAID would not say who had approved the programme or whether the White House was aware of it. McSpedon, the most senior official named in the documents obtained by the AP, is a mid-level manager who declined to comment.
USAID spokesman Matt Herrick said the agency is proud of its Cuba programmes and noted that congressional investigators reviewed them last year and found them to be consistent with US law.
"USAID is a development agency, not an intelligence agency, and we work all over the world to help people exercise their fundamental rights and freedoms, and give them access to tools to improve their lives and connect with the outside world,'' he said.
"In the implementation,'' he added, "has the government taken steps to be discreet in non-permissive environments? Of course. That's how you protect the practitioners and the public. In hostile environments, we often take steps to protect the partners we're working with on the ground. This is not unique to Cuba.''
But the ZunZuneo programme muddies those claims, a sensitive issue for its mission to promote democracy and deliver aid to the world's poor and vulnerable — which requires the trust of foreign governments.
"On the face of it there are several aspects about this that are troubling,'' said Sen Patrick Leahy, D-Vt. and chairman of the Appropriations Committee's State Department and foreign operations subcommittee.
"There is the risk to young, unsuspecting Cuban cellphone users who had no idea this was a US government-funded activity. There is the clandestine nature of the programme that was not disclosed to the appropriations subcommittee with oversight responsibility. And there is the disturbing fact that it apparently activated shortly after Alan Gross, a USAID subcontractor who was sent to Cuba to help provide citizens access to the Internet, was arrested.''
Associated Press obtained more than 1,000 pages of documents about the project's development. The AP independently verified the project's scope and details in the documents — such as federal contract numbers and names of job candidates — through publicly available databases, government sources and interviews with those directly involved in ZunZuneo.
Taken together, they tell the story of how agents of the US government, working in deep secrecy, became tech entrepreneurs — in Cuba. And it all began with a half a million cellphone numbers obtained from a communist government.
ZunZuneo would seem to be a throwback from the Cold War, and the decades-long struggle between the United States and Cuba. It came at a time when the historically sour relationship between the countries had improved, at least marginally, and Cuba had made tentative steps toward a more market-based economy.
It is unclear whether the plan got its start with USAID or Creative Associates International, a Washington, DC, for-profit company that has earned hundreds of millions of dollars in US contracts. But a "key contact'' at Cubacel, the state-owned cellphone provider, slipped the phone numbers to a Cuban engineer living in Spain. The engineer provided the numbers to USAID and Creative Associates "free of charge,'' documents show.
In mid-2009, Noy Villalobos, a manager with Creative Associates who had worked with USAID in the 1990s on a programme to eradicate drug crops, started an IM chat with her little brother in Nicaragua, according to a Creative Associates email that captured the conversation. Mario Bernheim, in his mid-20s, was an up-and-coming techie who had made a name for himself as a computer whiz.
"This is very confidential of course,'' Villalobos cautioned her brother. But what could you do if you had all the cellphone numbers of a particular country? Could you send bulk text messages without the government knowing?
"Can you encrypt it or something?'' she texted.
She was looking for a direct line to regular Cubans through text messaging. Most had precious little access to news from the outside world. The government viewed the Internet as an Achilles' heel and controlled it accordingly. A communications minister had even referred to it as a "wild colt'' that "should be tamed.''
Yet in the years since Fidel Castro handed over power to his brother Raul, Cuba had sought to jumpstart the long stagnant economy. Raul Castro began encouraging cellphone use, and hundreds of thousands of people were suddenly using mobile phones for the first time, though smartphones with access to the Internet remained restricted.
Cubans could text message, though at a high cost in a country where the average wage was a mere $20 a month.
Bernheim told his sister that he could figure out a way to send instant texts to hundreds of thousands of Cubans — for cheap. It could not be encrypted though, because that would be too complicated. They wouldn't be able to hide the messages from the Cuban government, which owned Cubacel. But they could disguise who was sending the texts by constantly switching the countries the messages came from.
"We could rotate it from different countries?'' Villalobos asked. "Say one message from Nica, another from Spain, another from Mexico''?
Bernheim could do that. "But I would need mirrors set up around the world, mirrors, meaning the same computer, running with the same platform, with the same phone.''
"No hay problema,'' he signed off. No problem.
After the chat, Creative hired Bernheim as a subcontractor, reporting to his sister. (Villalobos and Bernheim would later confirm their involvement with the ZunZuneo project to AP, but decline further comment.) Bernheim, in turn, signed up the Cuban engineer who had gotten the phone list. The team figured out how to message the masses without detection, but their ambitions were bigger.
Creative Associates envisioned using the list to create a social networking system that would be called "Proyecto ZZ,'' or "Project ZZ.'' The service would start cautiously and be marketed chiefly to young Cubans, who USAID saw as the most open to political change.
"We should gradually increase the risk,'' USAID proposed in a document. It advocated using "smart mobs'' only in "critical/opportunistic situations and not at the detriment of our core platform-based network.''
USAID's team of contractors and subcontractors built a companion website to its text service so Cubans could subscribe, give feedback and send their own text messages for free. They talked about how to make the website look like a real business. "Mock ad banners will give it the appearance of a commercial enterprise,'' a proposal suggested.
In multiple documents, USAID staff pointed out that text messaging had mobilized smart mobs and political uprisings in Moldova and the Philippines, among others. In Iran, the USAID noted social media's role following the disputed election of then President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in June 2009 — and saw it as an important foreign policy tool.
USAID documents say their strategic objective in Cuba was to "push it out of a stalemate through tactical and temporary initiatives, and get the transition process going again towards democratic change.'' Democratic change in authoritarian Cuba meant breaking the Castros' grip on power.
USAID divided Cuban society into five segments depending on loyalty to the government. On one side sat the "democratic movement,'' called "still (largely) irrelevant,'' and at the other end were the "hard-core system supporters,'' dubbed "Talibanes'' in a derogatory comparison to Afghan and Pakistani extremists.
A key question was how to move more people toward the democratic activist camp without detection. Bernheim assured the team that wouldn't be a problem.
"The Cuban government, like other regimes committed to information control, currently lacks the capacity to effectively monitor and control such a service,'' Bernheim wrote in a proposal for USAID marked "Sensitive Information.''
ZunZuneo would use the list of phone numbers to break Cuba's Internet embargo and not only deliver information to Cubans but also let them interact with each other in a way the government could not control. Eventually it would build a system that would let Cubans send messages anonymously among themselves.
At a strategy meeting, the company discussed building "user volume as a cover ... for organization,'' according to meeting notes. It also suggested that the "Landscape needs to be large enough to hide full opposition members who may sign up for service.''
In a play on the telecommunication minister's quote, the team dubbed their network the "untamed colt.''
At first, the ZunZuneo team operated out of Central America. Bernheim, the techie brother, worked from Nicaragua's capital, Managua, while McSpedon supervised Creative's work on ZunZuneo from an office in San Jose, Costa Rica, though separate from the US embassy. It was an unusual arrangement that raised eyebrows in Washington, according to US officials.
McSpedon worked for USAID's Office of Transition Initiatives (OTI), a division that was created after the fall of the Soviet Union to promote US interests in quickly changing political environments — without the usual red tape.
In 2009, a report by congressional researchers warned that OTI's work "often lends itself to political entanglements that may have diplomatic implications.'' Staffers on oversight committees complained that USAID was running secret programmes and would not provide details.
"We were told we couldn't even be told in broad terms what was happening because 'people will die,''' said Fulton Armstrong, who worked for the Senate Foreign Relations committee. Before that, he was the US intelligence community's most senior analyst on Latin America, advising the Clinton White House.
The money that Creative Associates spent on ZunZuneo was publicly earmarked for an unspecified project in Pakistan, government data show. But there is no indication of where the funds were actually spent.
Tensions with Congress spiked just as the ZunZuneo project was gearing up in December 2009, when another USAID programme ended in the arrest of the US contractor, Alan Gross. Gross had traveled repeatedly to Cuba on a secret mission to expand Internet access using sensitive technology typically available only to governments, a mission first revealed in February 2012 by AP.
At some point, Armstrong says, the foreign relations committee became aware of OTI's secret operations in Costa Rica. US government officials acknowledged them privately to Armstrong, but USAID refused to provide operational details.
At an event in Washington, Armstrong says he confronted McSpedon, asking him if he was aware that by operating secret programmes from a third country, it might appear like he worked for an intelligence agency.
McSpedon, through USAID, said the story is not true. He declined to comment otherwise.
On September 20, 2009, thousands of Cubans gathered at Revolution Plaza in Havana for Colombian rocker Juanes' "Peace without Borders'' concert. It was the largest public gathering in Cuba since the visit of Pope John Paul II in 1998. Under the watchful gaze of a giant sculpture of revolutionary icon Ernesto "Che'' Guevara, the Miami-based Juanes promised music aimed at "turning hate into love.''
But for the ZunZuneo team, the concert was a perfect opportunity to test the political power of their budding social network. In the weeks before, Bernheim's firm, using the phone list, sent out a half a million text messages in what it called "blasts,'' to test what the Cuban government would do.
The team hired Alen Lauzan Falcon, a Havana-born satirical artist based in Chile, to write Cuban-style messages. Some were mildly political and comical, others more pointed. One asked respondents whether they thought two popular local music acts out of favor with the government should join the stage with Juanes. Some 100,000 people responded — not realizing the poll was used to gather critical intelligence.
Paula Cambronero, a researcher for Mobile Accord, began building a vast database about the Cuban subscribers, including gender, age, "receptiveness'' and "political tendencies.'' USAID believed the demographics on dissent could help it target its other Cuba programmes and "maximize our possibilities to extend our reach.''
Cambronero concluded that the team had to be careful. "Messages with a humorous connotation should not contain a strong political tendency, so as not to create animosity in the recipients,'' she wrote in a report.
Falcon, in an interview, said he was never told that he was composing messages for a US government programme, but he had no regrets about his involvement.
"They didn't tell me anything, and if they had, I would have done it anyway,'' he said. "In Cuba they don't have freedom. While a government forces me to pay in order to visit my country, makes me ask permission, and limits my communications, I will be against it, whether it's Fidel Castro, (Cuban exile leader) Jorge Mas Canosa or Gloria Estefan,'' the Cuban American singer.
Carlos Sanchez Almeida, a lawyer specializing in European data protection law, said it appeared that the US programme violated Spanish privacy laws because the ZunZuneo team had illegally gathered personal data from the phone list and sent unsolicited emails using a Spanish platform. "The illegal release of information is a crime, and using information to create a list of people by political affiliation is totally prohibited by Spanish law,'' Almeida said. It would violate a US-European data protection agreement, he said.
USAID saw evidence from server records that Havana had tried to trace the texts, to break into ZunZuneo's servers, and had occasionally blocked messages. But USAID called the response "timid'' and concluded that ZunZuneo would be viable — if its origins stayed secret.
Even though Cuba has one of the most sophisticated counter-intelligence operations in the world, the ZunZuneo team thought that as long as the message service looked benign, Cubacel would leave it alone.
Once the network had critical mass, Creative and USAID documents argued, it would be harder for the Cuban government to shut it down, both because of popular demand and because Cubacel would be addicted to the revenues from the text messages.
In February 2010, the company introduced Cubans to ZunZuneo and began marketing. Within six months, it had almost 25,000 subscribers, growing faster and drawing more attention than the USAID team could control.
Saimi Reyes Carmona was a journalism student at the University of Havana when she stumbled onto ZunZuneo. She was intrigued by the service's novelty, and the price. The advertisement said "free messages'' so she signed up using her nickname, Saimita.
At first, ZunZuneo was a very tiny platform, Reyes said during a recent interview in Havana, but one day she went to its website and saw its services had expanded.
"I began sending one message every day,'' she said, the maximum allowed at the start. "I didn't have practically any followers.'' She was thrilled every time she got a new one.
And then ZunZuneo exploded in popularity.
"The whole world wanted in, and in a question of months I had 2,000 followers who I have no idea who they are, nor where they came from.''
She let her followers know the day of her birthday, and was surprised when she got some 15 personal messages. "This is the coolest thing I've ever seen!'' she told her boyfriend, Ernesto Guerra Valdes, also a journalism student.
Before long, Reyes learned she had the second highest number of followers on the island, after a user called UCI, which the students figured was Havana's University of Computer Sciences. Her boyfriend had 1,000. The two were amazed at the reach it gave them.
"It was such a marvelous thing,'' Guerra said. "So noble.'' He and Reyes tried to figure out who was behind ZunZuneo, since the technology to run it had to be expensive, but they found nothing. They were grateful though.
"We always found it strange, that generosity and kindness,'' he said. ZunZuneo was "the fairy godmother of cellphones.''
By early 2010, Creative decided that ZunZuneo was so popular Bernheim's company wasn't sophisticated enough to build, in effect, "a scaled down version of Twitter.''
It turned to another young techie, James Eberhard, CEO of Denver-based Mobile Accord Inc. Eberhard had pioneered the use of text messaging for donations during disasters and had raised tens of millions of dollars after the January 2010 earthquake in Haiti.
Eberhard earned millions in his mid-20s when he sold a company that developed cellphone ring tones and games. His company's website describes him as "a visionary within the global mobile community.''
In July, he flew to Barcelona to join McSpedon, Bernheim, and others to work out what they called a "below the radar strategy.''
"If it is discovered that the platform is, or ever was, backed by the United States government, not only do we risk the channel being shut down by Cubacel, but we risk the credibility of the platform as a source of reliable information, education, and empowerment in the eyes of the Cuban people,'' Mobile Accord noted in a memo.
To cover their tracks, they decided to have a company based in the United Kingdom set up a corporation in Spain to run ZunZuneo. A separate company called MovilChat was created in the Cayman Islands, a well-known offshore tax haven, with an account at the island's Bank of N.T. Butterfield & Son Ltd. to pay the bills.
A memo of the meeting in Barcelona says that the front companies would distance ZunZuneo from any US ownership so that the "money trail will not trace back to America.''
But it wasn't just the money they were worried about. They had to hide the origins of the texts, according to documents and interviews with team members.
Brad Blanken, the former chief operating officer of Mobile Accord, left the project early on, but noted that there were two main criteria for success.
"The biggest challenge with creating something like this is getting the phone numbers,'' Blanken said. "And then the ability to spoof the network.''
The team of contractors set up servers in Spain and Ireland to process texts, contracting an independent Spanish company called Lleida.net to send the text messages back to Cuba, while stripping off identifying data.
Mobile Accord also sought intelligence from engineers at the Spanish telecommunications company Telefonica, which organizers said would "have knowledge of Cubacel's network.''
"Understanding the security and monitoring protocols of Cubacel will be an invaluable asset to avoid unnecessary detection by the carrier,'' one Mobile Accord memo read.
Officials at USAID realized however, that they could not conceal their involvement forever — unless they left the stage. The predicament was summarized bluntly when Eberhard was in Washington for a strategy session in early February 2011, where his company noted the "inherent contradiction'' of giving Cubans a platform for communications uninfluenced by their government that was in fact financed by the US government and influenced by its agenda.
They turned to Jack Dorsey, a co-founder of Twitter, to seek funding for the project. Documents show Dorsey met with Suzanne Hall, a state department officer who worked on social media projects, and others. Dorsey declined to comment.
The state department under then-secretary Hillary Rodham Clinton thought social media was an important tool in diplomacy. At a 2011 speech at George Washington University, Clinton said the US helped people in "oppressive Internet environments get around filters.'' In Tunisia, she said people used technology to "organize and share grievances, which, as we know, helped fuel a movement that led to revolutionary change.''
Ultimately, the solution was new management that could separate ZunZuneo from its US origins and raise enough revenue for it to go "independent,'' even as it kept its long-term strategy to bring about "democratic change.''
Eberhard led the recruitment efforts, a sensitive operation because he intended to keep the management of the Spanish company in the dark.
"The ZZ management team will have no knowledge of the true origin of the operation; as far as they know, the platform was established by Mobile Accord,'' the memo said. "There should be zero doubt in management's mind and no insecurities or concerns about United States Government involvement.''
The memo went on to say that the CEO's clean conscience would be ``particularly critical when dealing with Cubacel.'' Sensitive to the high cost of text messages for average Cubans, ZunZuneo negotiated a bulk rate for texts at 4 cents a pop through a Spanish intermediary. Documents show there was hope that an earnest, clueless CEO might be able to persuade Cubacel to back the project.
Mobile Accord considered a dozen candidates from five countries to head the Spanish front company. One of them was Francoise de Valera, a CEO who was vacationing in Dubai when she was approached for an interview. She flew to Barcelona. At the luxury Mandarin Oriental Hotel, she met with Nim Patel, who at the time was Mobile Accord's president. Eberhard had also flown in for the interviews. But she said she couldn't get a straight answer about what they were looking for.
"They talked to me about instant messaging but nothing about Cuba, or the United States,'' she told the AP in an interview from London.
"If I had been offered and accepted the role, I believe that sooner or later it would have become apparent to me that something wasn't right,'' she said.
By early 2011, Creative Associates grew exasperated with Mobile Accord's failure to make ZunZuneo self-sustaining and independent of the US government. The operation had run into an unsolvable problem. USAID was paying tens of thousands of dollars in text messaging fees to Cuba's communist telecommunications monopoly routed through a secret bank account and front companies. It was not a situation that it could either afford or justify — and if exposed it would be embarrassing, or worse.
In a searing evaluation, Creative Associates said Mobile Accord had ignored sustainability because "it has felt comfortable receiving USG financing to move the venture forward.''
Out of 60 points awarded for performance, Mobile Accord scored 34 points. Creative Associates complained that Mobile Accord's understanding of the social mission of the project was weak, and gave it 3 out of 10 points for "commitment to our Programme goals.''
Mobile Accord declined to comment on the programme.
In increasingly impatient tones, Creative Associates pressed Mobile Accord to find new revenue that would pay the bills. Mobile Accord suggested selling targeted advertisements in Cuba, but even with projections of up to a million ZunZuneo subscribers, advertising in a state-run economy would amount to a pittance.
By March 2011, ZunZuneo had about 40,000 subscribers. To keep a lower profile, it abandoned previous hopes of reaching 200,000 and instead capped the number of subscribers at a lower number. It limited ZunZuneo's text messages to less than one percent of the total in Cuba, so as to avoid the notice of Cuban authorities. Though one former ZunZuneo worker — who spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to speak publicly about his work — said the Cubans were catching on and had tried to block the site.
Toward the middle of 2012, Cuban users began to complain that the service worked only sporadically. Then not at all.
ZunZuneo vanished as mysteriously as it appeared.
By June 2012, users who had access to Facebook and Twitter were wondering what had happened.
"Where can you pick up messages from ZunZuneo?'' one woman asked on Facebook in November 2012. "Why aren't I receiving them anymore?''
Users who went to ZunZuneo's website were sent to a children's website with a similar name.
Reyner Aguero, a 25-year-old blogger, said he and fellow students at Havana's University of Computer Sciences tried to track it down. Someone had rerouted the website through DNS blocking, a censorship technique initially developed back in the 1990s. Intelligence officers later told the students that ZunZuneo was blacklisted, he said.
"ZunZuneo, like everything else they did not control, was a threat,'' Aguero said. "Period.''
In incorrect Spanish, ZunZuneo posted a note on its Facebook page saying it was aware of problems accessing the website and that it was trying to resolve them.
" iQue viva el ZunZuneo!'' the message said. Long live ZunZuneo!
In February, when Saimi Reyes, and her boyfriend, Ernesto Guerra, learned the origins of ZunZuneo, they were stunned.
"How was I supposed to realize that?'' Guerra asked. "It's not like there was a sign saying 'Welcome to ZunZuneo, brought to you by USAID.''
"Besides, there was nothing wrong. If I had started getting subversive messages or death threats or 'Everyone into the streets,''' he laughed, "I would have said, 'OK,' there's something fishy about this. But nothing like that happened.''
USAID says the programme ended when the money ran out. The Cuban government declined to comment.
The former web domain is now a placeholder, for sale for $299. The registration for MovilChat, the Cayman Islands front company, was set to expire on March 31.
In Cuba, nothing has come close to replacing it. Internet service still is restricted.
"The moment when ZunZuneo disappeared was like a vacuum,'' Guerra said. "People texted my phone, 'What is happening with ZunZuneo?'
"In the end, we never learned what happened,'' he said. "We never learned where it came from.''
Source: http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/us/US-secretly-created-Cuban-Twitter-to-stirunrest/articleshow/33170236.cms
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)